Why didn't they implement another hotel tax?
#1
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Why didn't they implement another hotel tax?
It's a known fact that cities will implement a hotel tax so travelers foot the bill for city toys and necessities. Here you have widely traveled part of the United States and everyone would much rather have their priorities *** backwards as usual.
Read this Article from one of NO's newspaper outlets I dug-up. I got to thinking about taxes and knew there had to be something on this. Make sure you read it. Then when you realize they yielded $30million in one year you might reconsider who's more at fault here.
This is exactly why Sacramento is having a hard time bending backwards for the Kings and the Maloofs. It's because Sacramento isn't a traveling hot spot. Most traveling done to Sacramento is done by state and federal officials from the Hyatt. So when we're asked to **** a new multi-million dollar state-of-the-art stadium it's a major blow to us. It's also a big reason why cities like San Francisco are self-reliant. It's a year around hot spot for weekend and business travelers. The only other thing they had to implement was the recent toll on the Bay Bridge IIRC. But still, a slightly higher toll isn't so bad when having to build a $billion+ bridge. At least a lot of local travelers pay the toll as well on the weekends. Hell, those that cross the bridge and stay in a hotel really drive your economy, don't they? I probably paid for a bucket full of those rivets.
My point is if they started in 1965 or even as late as 1980, they wouldn't be in half this mess. They could have a funded the most intricate levee system ever created. One that could withhold an atom bomb. Seriously. But instead, they pissed it all away on the Superdome and other sports & recreation venues. It's just carelessness at the umpteen level.
Read this Article from one of NO's newspaper outlets I dug-up. I got to thinking about taxes and knew there had to be something on this. Make sure you read it. Then when you realize they yielded $30million in one year you might reconsider who's more at fault here.
This is exactly why Sacramento is having a hard time bending backwards for the Kings and the Maloofs. It's because Sacramento isn't a traveling hot spot. Most traveling done to Sacramento is done by state and federal officials from the Hyatt. So when we're asked to **** a new multi-million dollar state-of-the-art stadium it's a major blow to us. It's also a big reason why cities like San Francisco are self-reliant. It's a year around hot spot for weekend and business travelers. The only other thing they had to implement was the recent toll on the Bay Bridge IIRC. But still, a slightly higher toll isn't so bad when having to build a $billion+ bridge. At least a lot of local travelers pay the toll as well on the weekends. Hell, those that cross the bridge and stay in a hotel really drive your economy, don't they? I probably paid for a bucket full of those rivets.
My point is if they started in 1965 or even as late as 1980, they wouldn't be in half this mess. They could have a funded the most intricate levee system ever created. One that could withhold an atom bomb. Seriously. But instead, they pissed it all away on the Superdome and other sports & recreation venues. It's just carelessness at the umpteen level.
Last edited by Salty; 09-05-2005 at 11:55 AM.
#2
Originally Posted by Salty
It's a know fact that cities will implement a hotel tax so travelers foot the bill for city toys and necessities. Here you have widely traveled part of the United States and everyone would much rather have their priorities *** backwards as usual.
Read this Article from one of NO's newspaper outlets I dug-up. I got to thinking about taxes and knew there had to be something on this. Make sure you read it. Then when you realize they yielded $30million in one year you might reconsider who's more at fault here.
This is exactly why Sacramento is having a hard time bending backwards for the Kings and the Maloofs. It's because Sacramento isn't a traveling hot spot. Most traveling done to Sacramento is done by state and federal officials from the Hyatt. So when we're asked to **** a new multi-million dollar state-of-the-art stadium it's a major blow to us. It's also a big reason why cities like San Francisco are self-reliant. It's a year around hot spot for weekend and business travelers. The only other thing they had to implement was the recent toll on the Bay Bridge IIRC. But still, a slightly higher toll isn't so bad when having to build a $billion+ bridge. At least a lot of local travelers pay the toll as well on the weekends. Hell, those that cross the bridge and stay in a hotel really drive your economy, don't they? I probably paid for a bucket full of those rivets.
My point is if they started in 1965 or even as late as 1980, they wouldn't be in half this mess. They could have a funded the most intricate levee system ever created. One that could withhold an atom bomb. Seriously. But instead, they pissed it all away on the Superdome and other sports & recreation venues. It's just carelessness at the umpteen level.
Read this Article from one of NO's newspaper outlets I dug-up. I got to thinking about taxes and knew there had to be something on this. Make sure you read it. Then when you realize they yielded $30million in one year you might reconsider who's more at fault here.
This is exactly why Sacramento is having a hard time bending backwards for the Kings and the Maloofs. It's because Sacramento isn't a traveling hot spot. Most traveling done to Sacramento is done by state and federal officials from the Hyatt. So when we're asked to **** a new multi-million dollar state-of-the-art stadium it's a major blow to us. It's also a big reason why cities like San Francisco are self-reliant. It's a year around hot spot for weekend and business travelers. The only other thing they had to implement was the recent toll on the Bay Bridge IIRC. But still, a slightly higher toll isn't so bad when having to build a $billion+ bridge. At least a lot of local travelers pay the toll as well on the weekends. Hell, those that cross the bridge and stay in a hotel really drive your economy, don't they? I probably paid for a bucket full of those rivets.
My point is if they started in 1965 or even as late as 1980, they wouldn't be in half this mess. They could have a funded the most intricate levee system ever created. One that could withhold an atom bomb. Seriously. But instead, they pissed it all away on the Superdome and other sports & recreation venues. It's just carelessness at the umpteen level.
#4
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
I posted this at Nasioc without any response there: http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=840274
I posted it there because every thread on Katrina is incredibly against Bush when it really shouldn't be.
I posted it there because every thread on Katrina is incredibly against Bush when it really shouldn't be.
#5
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,650
From: Mountains
Car Info: 2007 Nissan Frontier
Very good post 1reguL8nSTi! Thanks for the info.
All of the blame for this shouldn't be on one person, or city. New Orleans screwed up. FEMA screwed up. Bush screwed up by not coming down sooner (if not to help, just to help his reputation). Its just a big mess.
All of the blame for this shouldn't be on one person, or city. New Orleans screwed up. FEMA screwed up. Bush screwed up by not coming down sooner (if not to help, just to help his reputation). Its just a big mess.
#6
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by Imprezastifan88
FEMA screwed up. Bush screwed up by not coming down sooner (if not to help, just to help his reputation). Its just a big mess.
I guess what really pisses me off is that **** somehow rolls uphill in the civilian world as opposed to downhill in the military. Maybe that's why the military is efficient, more conservative and incapable of error without a huge dog and pony show? I really miss that part of the service. If the civilian world caught wind that a fat solider failed his PT test then they'd be happy to bestow more blame on the Division commander for not making PT twice a day mandatory. The fact he was stuffing his face with tacobell at the PX and beer on the weekends without doing remedial PT on his own would fly right out the damn window. I guess a lot of the animosity comes from the fact most of these people never liked Bush since 2000. Obviously...
#7
Originally Posted by Salty
I agree. I wasn't trying to pass the buck off of Bush and FEMA and specifically mention the logistical rat****. They screwed-up without a doubt. But the more I hear about New Orleans incompetence the more I’m inclined to bestow more and more responsibility and blame on their shoulders.
I guess what really pisses me off is that **** somehow rolls uphill in the civilian world as opposed to downhill in the military. Maybe that's why the military is efficient, more conservative and incapable of error without a huge dog and pony show? I really miss that part of the service. If the civilian world caught wind that a fat solider failed his PT test then they'd be happy to bestow more blame on the Division commander for not making PT twice a day mandatory. The fact he was stuffing his face with tacobell at the PX and beer on the weekends without doing remedial PT on his own would fly right out the damn window. I guess a lot of the animosity comes from the fact most of these people never liked Bush since 2000. Obviously...
I guess what really pisses me off is that **** somehow rolls uphill in the civilian world as opposed to downhill in the military. Maybe that's why the military is efficient, more conservative and incapable of error without a huge dog and pony show? I really miss that part of the service. If the civilian world caught wind that a fat solider failed his PT test then they'd be happy to bestow more blame on the Division commander for not making PT twice a day mandatory. The fact he was stuffing his face with tacobell at the PX and beer on the weekends without doing remedial PT on his own would fly right out the damn window. I guess a lot of the animosity comes from the fact most of these people never liked Bush since 2000. Obviously...
#8
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,256
From: Blue-faced in a red state
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
I would have to agree. I think that the war has stretched us thin, but I think that the problems in NO and MS go way beyond that thinness.
One question though: where is the love for Mississippi? They got hammered but noone seems to care. Im thinking about driving down there from GA and load my pick-up with some gear.
One question though: where is the love for Mississippi? They got hammered but noone seems to care. Im thinking about driving down there from GA and load my pick-up with some gear.
#9
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by dub2w
I would have to agree. I think that the war has stretched us thin, but I think that the problems in NO and MS go way beyond that thinness.
One question though: where is the love for Mississippi? They got hammered but noone seems to care. Im thinking about driving down there from GA and load my pick-up with some gear.
One question though: where is the love for Mississippi? They got hammered but noone seems to care. Im thinking about driving down there from GA and load my pick-up with some gear.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
subie OCD
Site Suggestions and Feedback
11
06-29-2007 02:35 PM
Salty
Teh Politics Forum
1
01-03-2005 10:10 AM