Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

South Korean Main Battle Tank Experimental [vid]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2007, 05:21 PM
  #16  
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
You're suggestignthe US can fight a conventional ground war and invade a foreign country without armor units? SF, Infantry and the Air Force are all that's needed to defeat, suppress and occupy an enemy force?
Kevin M is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:23 PM
  #17  
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
after the edit

Originally Posted by 1reguL8NSTi
How long has it been since the U.S. has seriously considered a new tank?
How long has it been since we needed a better MBT? The improvements in capability of the M1A2 over the initial fielding of the M1 is greater than that of the original M1 to the M-60. It IS a new tank, and it came online around 1990. How many militaries that aren't inexorably allied with us have developed an MBT since 1980, that can come close to outclassing an M1A2?
Kevin M is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:30 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
spedmunki's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Zoomass: Riot Capital of New England
Posts: 909
Car Info: '97 Legacy
the posture control and defence mechs were b*tching!
spedmunki is offline  
Old 04-11-2007, 08:08 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
1reguL8NSTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: I gotta have more cow bell!!!!
Posts: 9,198
Car Info: 05 STi
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
You're suggestignthe US can fight a conventional ground war and invade a foreign country without armor units? SF, Infantry and the Air Force are all that's needed to defeat, suppress and occupy an enemy force?

Considering the fact that prior to any assault air power would absolutely decimate all static defenses and any MBT or APC in the open it could happen. The Army's transitioning the BCTs that have little armor support if any. The cordination between air power/artillery and ground forces now is near flawless. It would be a feasible option but would it happen........not likely in the foreseeable future.
1reguL8NSTi is offline  
Old 04-26-2007, 09:12 PM
  #20  
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
AJBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Jose
Posts: 750
Car Info: C32 AMG, Lincoln Navigator, LS1 Trans Am, E36 Bmw
That three wheel was Gangsta!

:wos_armee_070:

Tanks do serve a serious role on todays battle field. They offer tremendous mobile support and offer psychological superiority. The 120mm cannon doesn't hurt!
AJBoost is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jagan323
Videos
0
07-29-2011 05:03 PM
suby_dude
Bay Area
25
04-30-2008 10:06 PM



Quick Reply: South Korean Main Battle Tank Experimental [vid]



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:21 PM.