Pig-blood dipped bullets
03-12-2006 | 06:27 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
Pig-blood dipped bullets
http://www.nonislam.com/Page.html
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Kills The Body
And The Soul
Made from Real Pig's Blood!
And The Soul
Made from Real Pig's Blood!
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
03-12-2006 | 06:29 PM
#2
Thread Starter
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
Just before World War I, there were several terrorist attacks on the United States Forces in the Philippines. Islamic extremists were aggressively on the move. General Jack Pershing rounded-up 50 terrorists, and had them tied to posts for execution. He had his is men slaughter two pigs, in front of the horrified terrorists.
Muslims detest pork, because they believe pigs are filthy animals. Some of them simply refuse to eat it, while others won't even touch a pig. Call them crazy, but they believe that if their body is not clean, especially if they have some pork under their skin, that they are not going to meet Allah, and they won't be getting the usual 72 virgins.
The soldiers then soaked their bullets in the pig's blood, and proceeded to execute 49 of the terrorists by a proper firing squad. The soldiers dug a big hole, dumped in the terrorist's bodies, and proceeded to pile on the pig entrails. His men then feasted upon the pork and let the last terrorist go. The world then lived in harmony without a peep from Radical Islam for forty years.
"If we were fighting warewolves, we would be using silver bullets. It's Militant Islam, so we use pig shot.
Muslims detest pork, because they believe pigs are filthy animals. Some of them simply refuse to eat it, while others won't even touch a pig. Call them crazy, but they believe that if their body is not clean, especially if they have some pork under their skin, that they are not going to meet Allah, and they won't be getting the usual 72 virgins.
The soldiers then soaked their bullets in the pig's blood, and proceeded to execute 49 of the terrorists by a proper firing squad. The soldiers dug a big hole, dumped in the terrorist's bodies, and proceeded to pile on the pig entrails. His men then feasted upon the pork and let the last terrorist go. The world then lived in harmony without a peep from Radical Islam for forty years.
"If we were fighting warewolves, we would be using silver bullets. It's Militant Islam, so we use pig shot.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
03-12-2006 | 06:46 PM
#3
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
I don't believe this story was ever verified. I do think it's a great psyops tactic. I'm not 100% sure how far Muslims/Radical Muslims in the Middle East view pork in every sense?
I do know that a lot of unorthodox Muslims (especially in America and other Western countries) don't worry about pork if it's an unknown factor. So if a dish has a splash of pig fat through preparation or by accident, then they typically won't care or feel there will be any repercussions. They obviously won't go out of their way to buy something with pork in the ingredients or on the menu. I'm sure there are those that are more strict and are willing to ask a chef or dial the 800 number on the ingredient labels, etc.
http://urbanlegends.about.com/librar...k_pershing.htm
I do know that a lot of unorthodox Muslims (especially in America and other Western countries) don't worry about pork if it's an unknown factor. So if a dish has a splash of pig fat through preparation or by accident, then they typically won't care or feel there will be any repercussions. They obviously won't go out of their way to buy something with pork in the ingredients or on the menu. I'm sure there are those that are more strict and are willing to ask a chef or dial the 800 number on the ingredient labels, etc.
http://urbanlegends.about.com/librar...k_pershing.htm
Last edited by Salty; 03-12-2006 at 06:54 PM.
03-15-2006 | 12:51 PM
#5
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,133
From: Lastweek Lane - Watertown, NY
Car Info: 02WRXpseudoSTiWannabeWagon
This is no different that if someone had taken 50 Americans as prisoners and then rubbed bullets in feces before they executed them.
I'm not going to judge Black Jack because I'm unable to. I wasn't around and don't feel that by reading that story, I know all of the details. It was a different time and America was a vastly different culture. However, if he were around today, this act would have obviously had far-reaching repercussions.
You know, this is the problem. Americans as a whole have a hard time understanding the soldiers' ethos. We're not about humiliating, reciprocating, demeaning, or torturing for torturing sake. Those are NOT American values and they certainly aren't Army values.
We are trying to stop terrorism. Fruitless? Maybe. But that is our intent. We don't want to kill nor injure terrorists unless they have taken up the gun against us directly or in the past. As evidenced by Moussoi (sp), if for whatever reason, we are able to capture a terrorist then he is not summarily executed. He is put on trial.
In the course of direct combat, though, it is not always possible to 'try' and take prisoners. The enemy would have to drop their weapons and give up. We can't control that.
Now, with regards to torture in general and Abu Ghiraib. Torturing is obviously something that is an effective tool. Personally, I'd hate to be the tortured or the torturer, but it is a means to an end and though I am admittedly not very knowledgeable about the laws governing it, it is obviously a regulated method. I do know that the intent is that it is a tool towards gaining intelligence, however sometimes the one executing the torture may not be fully aware or inculcated as to the purpose which makes it easy for them to justify their application of it for retribution or just to get their jollies. It has been shown that this behavior will not be tolerated, but unfortunately, if torture has been applied as a tool inappropriately but not brought to light, it is obviously goes on as an unpunished crime.
To be honest, going back to the Black Jack Pershing story; my instinct is that while America and the Army may have been very distinct culturally from what it is today, the values were really no different. My feeling is that story is either somehow embellished or there are some facts that have been omitted.
I'm not going to judge Black Jack because I'm unable to. I wasn't around and don't feel that by reading that story, I know all of the details. It was a different time and America was a vastly different culture. However, if he were around today, this act would have obviously had far-reaching repercussions.
You know, this is the problem. Americans as a whole have a hard time understanding the soldiers' ethos. We're not about humiliating, reciprocating, demeaning, or torturing for torturing sake. Those are NOT American values and they certainly aren't Army values.
We are trying to stop terrorism. Fruitless? Maybe. But that is our intent. We don't want to kill nor injure terrorists unless they have taken up the gun against us directly or in the past. As evidenced by Moussoi (sp), if for whatever reason, we are able to capture a terrorist then he is not summarily executed. He is put on trial.
In the course of direct combat, though, it is not always possible to 'try' and take prisoners. The enemy would have to drop their weapons and give up. We can't control that.
Now, with regards to torture in general and Abu Ghiraib. Torturing is obviously something that is an effective tool. Personally, I'd hate to be the tortured or the torturer, but it is a means to an end and though I am admittedly not very knowledgeable about the laws governing it, it is obviously a regulated method. I do know that the intent is that it is a tool towards gaining intelligence, however sometimes the one executing the torture may not be fully aware or inculcated as to the purpose which makes it easy for them to justify their application of it for retribution or just to get their jollies. It has been shown that this behavior will not be tolerated, but unfortunately, if torture has been applied as a tool inappropriately but not brought to light, it is obviously goes on as an unpunished crime.
To be honest, going back to the Black Jack Pershing story; my instinct is that while America and the Army may have been very distinct culturally from what it is today, the values were really no different. My feeling is that story is either somehow embellished or there are some facts that have been omitted.
03-15-2006 | 02:47 PM
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,461
From: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
I heard that they were hanging bags of pig-fat on Israeli busses to stop bombers and that it was working to some effect.... hmmmmmmmm
03-15-2006 | 05:39 PM
#11
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by dr3d1zzl3
So much for death before dishonor.
glad to see the .mil is big on that still...
glad to see the .mil is big on that still...
03-15-2006 | 09:09 PM
#14
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by MonkeyAB
f*** that and anyone that approves of it. So sad.
I know you're a liberal person, Monkey... you may or may not fall under the same category of liberals that continuously belittles and bashes religion (especially Christianity), even though you're tolerant of the 1st amendment. These liberals point the finger in disgust on how anyone could have evangelic or other religious views. Sometimes they may even go a step further depending on the circumstances. They might get into a physical confrontation or make it their life goal to rid of "God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. Whatever...
But when it comes to something as superficial and baseless as dipping a piece of lead in pigs blood prior to launching it down a blistering hot barrel at mile per second, all bets are off?!
According to these liberals everything mentioned in the Bible , Quran, and other religious texts makes it no more significant than toilet paper... But hey, the radical Muslims may be on to something here so shame on us...
Last edited by Salty; 03-15-2006 at 09:55 PM.
