Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

Picture of Islamic woman about to be stoned to death

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2004 | 12:44 PM
  #1  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Unhappy Picture of Islamic woman about to be stoned to death

Islam in the Arab world can't be defended; it can only be given excuses IMHO.

With that I give you a picture of a woman about to be stoned to death for an act of freewill (adultery--unless you're under UCMJ) as far as America is concerned...


Name:  islam.bmp
Views: 9
Size:  167.5 KB



Anyone of you anti-status quo, anti-evangelical people on this forum care to support this photo?

Seriously... I don't think most leftists here care if anyone sees that as barbaric and sadistic, because they know enough people simply won't care. Just look at how many people still ignore Hussein's atrocities. Human Rights groups are more concerned over the treatment of terrorists holed up in Guantanamo Bay and in the back of a pick-up truck (recent SEAL photos) than they are of women and children in war-torn Somalia and women being buried to their breasts for lust. People just don't give a damn anymore because they’re too concerned about recording Friends on their purty tivo’s. Ignorance is bliss, and any attempts to stop it is automatically deemed racist and anyone who tries to stop it is an evil conqueror.
Old 12-27-2004 | 12:48 PM
  #2  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Here's the bigger photo so you can see the fear on her face.
Attached Thumbnails Picture of Islamic woman about to be stoned to death-stoned.bmp  
Old 12-27-2004 | 01:11 PM
  #3  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
I dare one of you mother ****ing Socialists...anyone of you pukes that pissed & moaned about "attrocities" our troops commited...to defend what is about to happen to this woman.

You make me want to invent a time machine just so I can travel back in time to give your mom an abortion.

Happy New Year.
Old 12-27-2004 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
OK so its all just fine what our troops did- and are still doing, she'd be much better off buried in a pile of rubble that used to be her house, or at the bottom of a naked human pyramid with electrodes on her genitals- even if she hadn't broken the islamic laws.

You two and your black-and-white, good-vs-evil, utter idiotic world-views are perfect examples of everything that's wrong with america these days.

Why can't you right wing nut jobs see like everyone else does that bad things are being done on both sides?

Fundamentalists evangelical "chrsitian"/zionist neo-cons = Fundamentalist radical islamists

They both think they deserve to rule the world and have neither have regard whatsoever for the humanity of anyone who has a contrary opinion.

both sides of this argument -as posited by the above posts are simply wrong.
Old 12-27-2004 | 02:18 PM
  #5  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by psoper
Fundamentalists evangelical "chrsitian"/zionist neo-cons = Fundamentalist radical islamists
I agree with most everything you've mentioned. The problem is that the equation above is false because these "Fundamentalists evangelical "Christian"/Zionist neo-cons" aren't sentencing a person to death based on their unpopular religious faith/practices, you see? You won't get sentenced to death when you practice Islam on "Evangelical soil." As a matter of fact we'll encourage your practices as part of the 1st amendment.

Other than that, the actions you mentioned are not part of U.S. doctrine. If an innocent bystander gets killed by a laser guided bomb intended for an insurgent stronghold then it's a shame. Likewise, if a few idiot soldiers play pin the electrode to the *****. The difference is we don't encourage either nor practice it as standard.

Last edited by Salty; 12-27-2004 at 02:20 PM.
Old 12-27-2004 | 02:30 PM
  #6  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Just as I expected from you.
According to you:

Lopping off heads < taking pictures of naked terrorists.
Stoning an adulteress < stepping on the neck of a terrorist.
Flying planes into buildings <<< having a dog bite terrorists.

"Fundamentalists evangelical "chrsitian"/zionist neo-cons = Fundamentalist radical islamists".

Brilliant!
Now provide evidence that supports this claim.
Perhaps a video showing a Muslim woman begging for her life just before "Christian" terrorists cut her head off.

"Why can't you right wing nut jobs see like everyone else does that bad things are being done on both sides?"

So Salty & I are the only two people on the planet that have this viewpoint?
Of course both sides are doing things that they shouldn't, but the difference is that the terrorists are purposely targeting women & children.

Right back at you!
"You ... are (a) perfect example of everything that's wrong with america these days."
Old 12-27-2004 | 02:38 PM
  #7  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
I think that if the media made a big deal about this stuff than things would be a little different. When was the pic taken?
Old 12-27-2004 | 02:47 PM
  #8  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by Oaf
So Salty & I are the only two people on the planet that have this viewpoint?
Of course both sides are doing things that they shouldn't, but the difference is that the terrorists are purposely targeting women & children.
My point exactly.

If you hit a kid on bicycle then it’s yet to be determined if it was an accident or manslaughter. It's considered a crime if it was proven that said person hit the child intentionally. It's considered accident if it’s proven that the child was at the wrong place at the wrong time. The same analogy holds true for the laser guided bombs hitting an innocent victim and the bad seeds from Abu Grihab that were punished accordingly. One involved a drunk driver in which they were punished -and- the other one involves an innocent driver involved in accident.

The major difference, in which Paul and I suggest, is that premeditation + consensus + encouragement (etc) in these acts are what make them standout notoriously. That said, there’s no question that a government death sentence for practicing any unpopular faith or slobbing another man’s **** is acceptable in comparison.

Last edited by Salty; 12-27-2004 at 02:59 PM.
Old 12-27-2004 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
I wonder what they would say if jerry faldwell started telling guys that it was ok to kill your wife if she cheated on you. Some of the left has a major double standard as far as tolerance goes
Old 12-28-2004 | 02:30 AM
  #10  
IS2Scooby's Avatar
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
My candidate won.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 12-28-2004 | 08:31 AM
  #11  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
I wonder what they would say if jerry faldwell started telling guys that it was ok to kill your wife if she cheated on you. Some of the left has a major double standard as far as tolerance goes
He would be considered sadistic, murderous, abusive and insane for such thoughts. Now take it one step further to a country where the government is full of these types of thinkers and over 99% of the population is in consensus because of fear or agreement. Perfectly fine as far as the left is concerned.
Old 12-28-2004 | 11:26 AM
  #12  
HellaDumb's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,461
From: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by psoper
OK so its all just fine what our troops did- and are still doing, she'd be much better off buried in a pile of rubble that used to be her house, or at the bottom of a naked human pyramid with electrodes on her genitals- even if she hadn't broken the islamic laws.
I vote for the naked human pyramid!

Psoper, no offense, but you sure have a contorted sense of reality.
Old 12-28-2004 | 12:01 PM
  #13  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Psoper, no offense, but you sure have a contorted sense of reality.
"Hello, Pot...I'm Kettle."
Old 12-28-2004 | 12:08 PM
  #14  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Psoper, no offense, but you sure have a contorted sense of reality.
Yeah- a contorted sense of reality, that explains it!

lets see, in my sense of reality;

Nobody should be forced to do anything against their will, especially- no one should be physically or emotionally tortured in any way.

So-called "crimes" such as drug use, engaging in personal sexual or religious practices that do not impact others and therefore do not have victims- should not be punished by incarceration.

Anyone inflicting torture should be considered guilty of a crime against the victims and should be convicted and punished accordingly.

People who have commited crimes impacting victims- like theivery, rape and murder should be brought to trial and convicted of said crimes on the basis of solid evidence of their wrongdoing before being incarcerated or otherwise "brought to justice".

Soveriegn nations should not be invaded or taken over by other nations just because they can.

And when such a time comes that a foreign power must take military action, such action should only go so far as to remove the influences or situation which created the need for said action.

Plunder and occupation by foreign powers are criminal acts in themselves.



Yup, really sick, twisted, and distorted is my view of reality....

Compared to yours- where I guess the prevailing guidelines are

- anyone who might be different than us is bad and should be treated- not like animals, but rather like garbage.

- its OK for any non-americans to have their cities bombed to rubble, its fine for them be tortured, maimed or killed- without any evidence aginst them - just because they were unfortunate enough to be born to the wrong family in the wrong place at the wrong time.

- until they either confess to their sins against the USA or just die and get out of the way.


That's a much healthier view of reality isn't it?
Old 12-28-2004 | 12:13 PM
  #15  
Jejunum's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 192
Anyone of you anti-status quo, anti-evangelical people on this forum care to support this photo?
uhhh, thats something evangelical christians would like to bring back. more death penalty more killing.


Quick Reply: Picture of Islamic woman about to be stoned to death



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:32 PM.