Clinton slams Bush on Katrina, war, budget
09-19-2005 | 10:22 AM
#3
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
From: location location
Car Info: 98 Impreza Outback Sport
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Is this any surprise?
So, is Clinton out of line or is Bush really F'ing things up? Don't make me mention the approval rating again....
On a side note- How about some subsatnce from one of you Bush supporters for a change... Your posts have all been rather short lately - what's wrong?
09-19-2005 | 10:40 AM
#4
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,256
From: Blue-faced in a red state
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
Actually Dumb, it is a bit of a surprise. Clinton has been working with Bush Sr. extensively to rebuild the areas hit by natural disasters (SE Asia and the gulf regions of US).
For Clinton to bring this up at this time, he must either feel that it is compelling to do so or he has a political agenda. I would say that both are probably true.
George W is really starting to show how much of a lame-duck president he will be for the remainder of his term.
For Clinton to bring this up at this time, he must either feel that it is compelling to do so or he has a political agenda. I would say that both are probably true.
George W is really starting to show how much of a lame-duck president he will be for the remainder of his term.
09-19-2005 | 10:43 AM
#5
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
From: location location
Car Info: 98 Impreza Outback Sport
Originally Posted by dub2w
George W is really starting to show how much of a lame-duck president he will be for the remainder of his term.
09-19-2005 | 12:15 PM
#6
Originally Posted by dub2w
Actually Dumb, it is a bit of a surprise. Clinton has been working with Bush Sr. extensively to rebuild the areas hit by natural disasters (SE Asia and the gulf regions of US).
For Clinton to bring this up at this time, he must either feel that it is compelling to do so or he has a political agenda. I would say that both are probably true.
George W is really starting to show how much of a lame-duck president he will be for the remainder of his term.
For Clinton to bring this up at this time, he must either feel that it is compelling to do so or he has a political agenda. I would say that both are probably true.
George W is really starting to show how much of a lame-duck president he will be for the remainder of his term.
09-19-2005 | 12:27 PM
#7
The Iraq war diverted US attention from the war on terrorism "and undermined the support that we might have had," Bush said in an interview with an ABC's "This Week" programme.
:rotfl:
I think he's just riding the poll numbers and setting things up for him and his wife. Most every criticizim in that article can be easily disputed by the other side.
Last edited by VIBEELEVEN; 09-19-2005 at 12:31 PM.
09-19-2005 | 12:38 PM
#8
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,198
From: I gotta have more cow bell!!!!
Car Info: 05 STi
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
:rotfl:
I think he's just riding the poll numbers and setting things up for him and his wife. Most every criticizim in that article can be easily disputed by the other side.
I think it's definetly all worth considering. He makes valid points but I'm suspecting some external motives. Not to say he isn't right but he anyone can point out wrong doing and Bush could easily criticize Clinton's time in office.
09-19-2005 | 12:43 PM
#9
Originally Posted by 1reguL8NSTi
I think it's definetly all worth considering.
09-19-2005 | 01:03 PM
#10
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,198
From: I gotta have more cow bell!!!!
Car Info: 05 STi
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
I do too, I thought that specific quote was funny because I really don't think Bush would have admitted that.
HAHA Must have been a typo.
09-19-2005 | 01:12 PM
#11
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by dub2w
Actually Dumb, it is a bit of a surprise. Clinton has been working with Bush Sr. extensively to rebuild the areas hit by natural disasters (SE Asia and the gulf regions of US).
For Clinton to bring this up at this time, he must either feel that it is compelling to do so or he has a political agenda. I would say that both are probably true.
George W is really starting to show how much of a lame-duck president he will be for the remainder of his term.
For Clinton to bring this up at this time, he must either feel that it is compelling to do so or he has a political agenda. I would say that both are probably true.
George W is really starting to show how much of a lame-duck president he will be for the remainder of his term.
Last edited by Salty; 09-19-2005 at 01:15 PM.
09-19-2005 | 02:38 PM
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,461
From: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
:rotfl:
I think he's just riding the poll numbers and setting things up for him and his wife. Most every criticizim in that article can be easily disputed by the other side.
09-19-2005 | 06:30 PM
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,650
From: Mountains
Car Info: 2007 Nissan Frontier
Though there is most likely a political agenda too, I do not believe that this is purely political. This is a big deal to break the unsaid "be nice to your sucessor" rule, and I don't think he would do that just for a political agenda (maybe he would, but IMO no).
Plus, he brings up good points that are obviously thought out as he has had a long time to put them together so I say +1 for Clinton.
Plus, he brings up good points that are obviously thought out as he has had a long time to put them together so I say +1 for Clinton.
09-19-2005 | 07:59 PM
#15
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
So, if Clinton sez that no WMDs existed, why did he make comments to the contrary & bomb Iraq?
During Clinton's reign, no poor people existed in New Orleans?
"If we really wanted to do it right, we would have had lots of buses lined up to take them out," Clinton.
:rotfl: Hasn't that asshat seen The Picture?
BTW, the % of people at/below poverty level is less today than when Herr Klinton was ruling.
During Clinton's reign, no poor people existed in New Orleans?
"If we really wanted to do it right, we would have had lots of buses lined up to take them out," Clinton.
:rotfl: Hasn't that asshat seen The Picture?
BTW, the % of people at/below poverty level is less today than when Herr Klinton was ruling.
Last edited by FW Motorsports; 09-19-2005 at 08:03 PM.