Will Subaru ever bring back the coupe?
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Drover
Ask yourself if it's worth dropping your best-selling line to develop a car for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a minor competitive series. It doesn't make economic sense to me.
Ask yourself if it's worth dropping your best-selling line to develop a car for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a minor competitive series. It doesn't make economic sense to me.
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Drover
Seems competing with Mitsubishi isn't a big concern right now.
Ask yourself if it's worth dropping your best-selling line to develop a car for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a minor competitive series. It doesn't make economic sense to me.
Seems competing with Mitsubishi isn't a big concern right now.
Ask yourself if it's worth dropping your best-selling line to develop a car for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a minor competitive series. It doesn't make economic sense to me.
I dont think they would need to drop the Imprezza, they could just make a hatch version.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
I just have to give my .02 here. WRC is not a minor motor sport by any means. look at the manufacturer's competing. Citroen, Peugeot, Ford (UK), Mitsu, Toyota, and Subaru all have cars designed specifically w/ racing in mind. even Skoda is switching to a smalled lighter wrc car later in the year. thats a lot of development. like shane said, it may be minor in the us, but it's one of the leading motorsports in on every other continent. now if we could only make it the leading motorsport in the US!! just think of the cars we would have! why do you think europe has so many awesome cars?? b/c of racing development. which is also why we have tanks like the monte carlo, and taurus, eeeew.
-PJ
-PJ
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
The main selling point for the sti is..
WRC status.
If it wasnt for the WRC there would be NO WRX...
So, it makes plenty economic sense to me, they need to start designing now, to continue being competitve.
If it wasnt for the WRC there would be NO WRX...
So, it makes plenty economic sense to me, they need to start designing now, to continue being competitve.
Originally posted by Drover
Seems competing with Mitsubishi isn't a big concern right now.
Ask yourself if it's worth dropping your best-selling line to develop a car for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a minor competitive series. It doesn't make economic sense to me.
Seems competing with Mitsubishi isn't a big concern right now.
Ask yourself if it's worth dropping your best-selling line to develop a car for what is, in the grand scheme of things, a minor competitive series. It doesn't make economic sense to me.
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The main selling point for the sti is..
Originally posted by WRCPOWER
If it wasnt for the WRC there would be NO WRX...
So, it makes plenty economic sense to me, they need to start designing now, to continue being competitve.
If it wasnt for the WRC there would be NO WRX...
So, it makes plenty economic sense to me, they need to start designing now, to continue being competitve.
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by X1_SRT
I just have to give my .02 here. WRC is not a minor motor sport by any means. look at the manufacturer's competing. Citroen, Peugeot, Ford (UK), Mitsu, Toyota, and Subaru all have cars designed specifically w/ racing in mind. even Skoda is switching to a smalled lighter wrc car later in the year. thats a lot of development. like shane said, it may be minor in the us, but it's one of the leading motorsports in on every other continent. now if we could only make it the leading motorsport in the US!! just think of the cars we would have! why do you think europe has so many awesome cars?? b/c of racing development. which is also why we have tanks like the monte carlo, and taurus, eeeew.
-PJ
I just have to give my .02 here. WRC is not a minor motor sport by any means. look at the manufacturer's competing. Citroen, Peugeot, Ford (UK), Mitsu, Toyota, and Subaru all have cars designed specifically w/ racing in mind. even Skoda is switching to a smalled lighter wrc car later in the year. thats a lot of development. like shane said, it may be minor in the us, but it's one of the leading motorsports in on every other continent. now if we could only make it the leading motorsport in the US!! just think of the cars we would have! why do you think europe has so many awesome cars?? b/c of racing development. which is also why we have tanks like the monte carlo, and taurus, eeeew.
-PJ
Mitsu is dropping the lancer for the Colt. So we might see some changes in Subaru in the near future, as they are becoming the only sedan on the races.
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yeah Toyota has been out for a while. there are a few privateer teams. but if you look at the most competitive teams, they all have smaller, lighter, 2dr cars. mitsu has gone out for 03, and i would suspect to see a 2dr entry for next year. skoda is switching to a smaller 2dr. subaru will be the only left. it seems they will have to go back to a 2dr version. either that or grow wings to catch sainz, gronholm, and mcrae. we'll have to wait and see...
-PJ
Rally Of Sweden starts this week!
-PJ
Rally Of Sweden starts this week!
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mitsu said they would need more then a year to develop the Colt as a rally car. The EVO is such an institution to Mitsu that I think they will find a way to make it a winner again. Nicky Grist on Speed channel said the big secret weapon the 206 has is its torque, not thats its smaller and lighter. I will have to check but dont all the rally cars weigh the same and have a minimum length they must achieve ?
I an wayyy of topic.....hatchback ( hows that )
I an wayyy of topic.....hatchback ( hows that )
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ProjekBluBuk
Hawaii
3
07-01-2007 07:58 AM