whats more efficient (mpg wise)
#16
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,801
From: my home is Portland but I'm @ School in Seattle
Car Info: 1998 Subaru Legacy L 5-speed
Originally posted by gordy
say I'm going to cruise on the fwy at about 85~90
say I'm going to cruise on the fwy at about 85~90
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by andyhidley
I probally should have said that I get bewteen 27-29MPG mostly highway..
And also with the windows closed and the air conditioner on I get ONE MPG BETTER than with the air conditioner off and the windows open
I probally should have said that I get bewteen 27-29MPG mostly highway..
And also with the windows closed and the air conditioner on I get ONE MPG BETTER than with the air conditioner off and the windows open
#18
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,016
From: Oakland, CA
Car Info: 2009 wrx & 2000 4runner
Originally posted by wrex04
Just in case anyone is interested the speed at which you lose out on gas mileage from having your window open is around 40-45 mph. It depends on the frontal area of the car and how much drag will be created. Just incase anyone wanted some useless engineering facts. We did it in class a yr ago so just thought I would share some knowledge with the rest of you guys.
Just in case anyone is interested the speed at which you lose out on gas mileage from having your window open is around 40-45 mph. It depends on the frontal area of the car and how much drag will be created. Just incase anyone wanted some useless engineering facts. We did it in class a yr ago so just thought I would share some knowledge with the rest of you guys.
#20
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 352
From: LA, 91355
Car Info: '03 WRX WRB
Originally posted by whitelegacy98
who cares about mpg, thats ticket territory, kind of outweighs the cost of gas
who cares about mpg, thats ticket territory, kind of outweighs the cost of gas
#21
Well that's what I meant because the original question was what gives better fuel mileage, i.e. efficiency. Not constant speeds in differant gears. I think the bottom line is just use common sense.
Be easy on the throttle and try to run "under vacuume" not boost. Just because your running "under vacuume does not mean that the turbo isnt working. At 3000 RPMs you can cruise at 75 in 5th and go down a hill or on the level and have vacuume. But once you start going up a hill then you may move into the boost area.
Be easy on the throttle and try to run "under vacuume" not boost. Just because your running "under vacuume does not mean that the turbo isnt working. At 3000 RPMs you can cruise at 75 in 5th and go down a hill or on the level and have vacuume. But once you start going up a hill then you may move into the boost area.
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
I'm a graduating civil engineering major, however, in our fluids class we did lots of these calculations with cars. Since our prof was a guy who liked cars we spent a week on how to find real stats of these sorts of things. Like if a golf ball has dimples to improve the reynold's number and such would it benefit you to take a hammer to your car and make dimples? Anyhow, based on the drag equation it came out that on an average day that 40-45 mph is where having the windows down creates significant drag. These calculations were based on a volkswagon bug (the new one) b/c that's the shape and area he had. But i'm sure it's pretty comparable since they are both sub compacts.
Oh and w/ the dimples, your car is already designed to have a high reynold's number so no bashing up your car w/ some hail damage or ding's will not increase your speed. Only reason I say this is b/c a poll was taken in our class and half the class said yes it would help, but ppl don't do it b/c then our cars would look like crap. At least they were half right.
Oh and w/ the dimples, your car is already designed to have a high reynold's number so no bashing up your car w/ some hail damage or ding's will not increase your speed. Only reason I say this is b/c a poll was taken in our class and half the class said yes it would help, but ppl don't do it b/c then our cars would look like crap. At least they were half right.
#23
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,016
From: Oakland, CA
Car Info: 2009 wrx & 2000 4runner
Originally posted by wrex04
I'm a graduating civil engineering major,
I'm a graduating civil engineering major,
<--- has degree in mechanical engineering but works as a civil design engineer. go figure
i was originally wanting to know what equations and stuff you used to figure it out. but once you said your fluids class i figured out how you went about it.
#24
Originally posted by andyhidley
theworx...
Subaru told me 3000RPM gives the best efficancy. Thus 4th gear @ 3,000 yields LESS AIR DRAG than 5th gear @3,000 due to speed differances
theworx...
Subaru told me 3000RPM gives the best efficancy. Thus 4th gear @ 3,000 yields LESS AIR DRAG than 5th gear @3,000 due to speed differances
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2point5AWD
Car Lounge
21
07-01-2006 07:19 PM
gordy
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
12
02-16-2004 01:20 AM
Steppin Razor
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
10
01-28-2003 09:00 AM