SRT4 spanks WRX
02-07-2003 | 08:15 PM
#121
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: SRT4 spanks WRX
Originally posted by samurai
Sorry to reintroduce the thread again, but I had to respond to this one.
I look at the SRT4 and only see a FWD car with a turbocharged 2.4l engine with sports sus. Seems like a meat and potatoes car in terms of technology with nothing out of the ordinary IMHO. Also, I would think that with a turbo powering the front wheels, that it pushes a lot going into corners. But, the price is good (~20k right?)for a car that powerful. I think it will take a chunk out of the Subaru WRX, Sentra SE-R, Integra Type-R and Ford Focus SVT market.
But, for me, I'd rather save up and get the Sti. The car that Dodge's SRT came up with is no comparison to the car that Subaru's STi came up with.
Tim
Sorry to reintroduce the thread again, but I had to respond to this one.
I look at the SRT4 and only see a FWD car with a turbocharged 2.4l engine with sports sus. Seems like a meat and potatoes car in terms of technology with nothing out of the ordinary IMHO. Also, I would think that with a turbo powering the front wheels, that it pushes a lot going into corners. But, the price is good (~20k right?)for a car that powerful. I think it will take a chunk out of the Subaru WRX, Sentra SE-R, Integra Type-R and Ford Focus SVT market.
But, for me, I'd rather save up and get the Sti. The car that Dodge's SRT came up with is no comparison to the car that Subaru's STi came up with.
Tim
you do know I was being sarcastic...right
02-07-2003 | 10:03 PM
#122
Guest
Posts: n/a
My last car was a 99 Neon R/T, and my car before that was a 95 Neon. I knew full well about the upcoming SRT-4 when I decided to step up to the WRX.
Having owned two of them, I can say that Neons are decent for what they are... extremely inexpensive transportation. They will get you where you need to go, but that's about it. They are noisy, harsh, squeaky, and generally feel pretty "cheap".
I could not be happier with my WRX (Now, if only I can learn to drive it up to its potential). No offense to Dodge, but I will never go back. The SRT-4 may sound like a good idea, but it's still a Neon.
So what if it's a tenth of a second faster or slower, it can only be driven like that 6 months out of the year where I live. Have an SRT owner try sprinting to 60 in the rain or snow. Not gonna' happen...
The WRX is year-round fun !!
Having owned two of them, I can say that Neons are decent for what they are... extremely inexpensive transportation. They will get you where you need to go, but that's about it. They are noisy, harsh, squeaky, and generally feel pretty "cheap".
I could not be happier with my WRX (Now, if only I can learn to drive it up to its potential). No offense to Dodge, but I will never go back. The SRT-4 may sound like a good idea, but it's still a Neon.
So what if it's a tenth of a second faster or slower, it can only be driven like that 6 months out of the year where I live. Have an SRT owner try sprinting to 60 in the rain or snow. Not gonna' happen...
The WRX is year-round fun !!
02-07-2003 | 10:16 PM
#123
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,051
From: In Dad's garage.
Car Info: MY02 GD WAGON, MY87 AW11
I think to bottom line is the dollar to fun ratio that the Neon has to the WRX. The same as the dollar to fun ratio the WRX would have to something like an Audi S4 for example.
Hey each to his own, buy a Neon if you want, the cash is yours. Im not one to judge. Now imagine if this thread started with buying a Honda over a WRX.............
-scu
Hey each to his own, buy a Neon if you want, the cash is yours. Im not one to judge. Now imagine if this thread started with buying a Honda over a WRX.............
-scu
02-07-2003 | 10:55 PM
#124
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,682
From: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
Re: Re: Re: SRT4 spanks WRX
Originally posted by WRXSTIle
Tim,
you do know I was being sarcastic...right
Tim,
you do know I was being sarcastic...right
.. Then I saw the serious posters post later on in the thread and thought it would be appropriate to post my 0.02. Tim
02-08-2003 | 07:18 AM
#125
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Scubaru
Now imagine if this thread started with buying a Honda over a WRX.............
Now imagine if this thread started with buying a Honda over a WRX.............
Last edited by Cabal; 02-08-2003 at 07:21 AM.
02-08-2003 | 12:49 PM
#126
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 242
From: Good ol oregon
Car Info: 02' WRX
SRT-4 and WRX arent really the same car. If you just buy one of these for straight up street racing (which is a pretty dumb investment if you ask me) then I suppose you can start comparing them but otherwise not really. The WRX is a rally inspired AWD sports sedan deisgned to appeal too rally fans and overall a more "mature audienence", therefore it also has more emphasis on handling. The SRT-4 is aimed at one group of people, teens. Dodge isnt interested in AWD or particulary good handling because the kiddies just want a cheap pocket rocket that can go fast in a straight line and beat their other friends pocket rockets. SRT-4 = power for cheap, less amenitities, far more rice rocket orientated. WRX = power/handling/AWD, far more rally crowd oreinentated.
02-08-2003 | 11:02 PM
#128
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,568
From: Rockland County...NY
Car Info: want a WRX
Originally posted by Br1t1shguy
SRT-4 and WRX arent really the same car. If you just buy one of these for straight up street racing (which is a pretty dumb investment if you ask me) then I suppose you can start comparing them but otherwise not really. The WRX is a rally inspired AWD sports sedan deisgned to appeal too rally fans and overall a more "mature audienence", therefore it also has more emphasis on handling. The SRT-4 is aimed at one group of people, teens. Dodge isnt interested in AWD or particulary good handling because the kiddies just want a cheap pocket rocket that can go fast in a straight line and beat their other friends pocket rockets. SRT-4 = power for cheap, less amenitities, far more rice rocket orientated. WRX = power/handling/AWD, far more rally crowd oreinentated.
SRT-4 and WRX arent really the same car. If you just buy one of these for straight up street racing (which is a pretty dumb investment if you ask me) then I suppose you can start comparing them but otherwise not really. The WRX is a rally inspired AWD sports sedan deisgned to appeal too rally fans and overall a more "mature audienence", therefore it also has more emphasis on handling. The SRT-4 is aimed at one group of people, teens. Dodge isnt interested in AWD or particulary good handling because the kiddies just want a cheap pocket rocket that can go fast in a straight line and beat their other friends pocket rockets. SRT-4 = power for cheap, less amenitities, far more rice rocket orientated. WRX = power/handling/AWD, far more rally crowd oreinentated.
02-08-2003 | 11:38 PM
#129
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18
From: Seattle
Car Info: stock USDM '02 WRX, no options, silver metallic
an objective argument
Originally posted by Scubaru
Not to back up Dodge or Subaru, but could I pose a question, Id like to hear opinions on this.
If you were given $26,000 that is the price for the WRX (retail, mind you....) and were told to buy a SRT-4, you just saved $6000 right? Ok, let move on.... with the $6000 you have left over buying a WRX, you could .... blah, blah, blah, yada, yada, yada. If you could you make the Neon out handle, accelerate, and out brake a subaru, would you? ...is the AWD the only factor?
My main reason for asking is WHY you would do it, IF you did. Just like to know what you guys think. Or better yet HOW you guys think.
-scu
Not to back up Dodge or Subaru, but could I pose a question, Id like to hear opinions on this.
If you were given $26,000 that is the price for the WRX (retail, mind you....) and were told to buy a SRT-4, you just saved $6000 right? Ok, let move on.... with the $6000 you have left over buying a WRX, you could .... blah, blah, blah, yada, yada, yada. If you could you make the Neon out handle, accelerate, and out brake a subaru, would you? ...is the AWD the only factor?
My main reason for asking is WHY you would do it, IF you did. Just like to know what you guys think. Or better yet HOW you guys think.
-scu
Subaru has proven that it is a better quality car than Dodge. Here are some facts on both cars...
>Consumer Reports' annual reliability survey (March 13, 2002)...
Subaru and Toyota brands lead the industry in fewest reported problems, each scoring 12 problems per 100 cars.
The Chrysler Group of DaimlerChrysler AG, though leading in domestic rankings, had a distant 22 problems per 100 cars.
>Consumer Repots' "Best & Worst Vehicles" (Nov. 2002)...
In addtition to receiving CR's "Recommended" rating, the Subaru Impreza is also listed under what they call the "best of the best", or "CR Good Bets" list.
In the same article, CR states the Dodge Neon is an "especially risky buy", earning it a place in their "Reliablity Risk" list.
>US IIHS frontal offset crash tests for small cars
The Impreza, like ALL its Subaru siblings, has achieved the highest rating (good) across the board in the IIHS' most recent series of frontal offset crashtests. The Impreza also earned the institute's coveted "Best Pick" designation.
The only cars to manage a score below the Neon's in the same small car crash tests were two Korean cars.
>NHTSA tests... (out of a possible five stars)
Impreza-- Frontal impacts: 4 stars for driver safety, 5 stars for front-passenger safety. Side impacts: 4 stars for front-passenger safety.
Neon--frontal crash tests: 4 stars for driver safety, 4 stars for front-passenger safety. Side impacts: 3 stars for front-passenger saftey.
>First-year awards....
WRX: Automobile magazine "Automobile of the Year"; Car and Driver "Top 10"; Edmunds.com "Editors' Most Wanted (Sports Sedan under $30,000)".
SRT-4: Sport Compact Car "Car of the Year".
Last edited by bxm; 02-08-2003 at 11:54 PM.
02-13-2003 | 10:55 AM
#130
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75
From: summit,NJ
Car Info: 97 OBS
wow.. you know if you think about it.. isn't the srt-4 a 2.4 litre turbo?.. and the WRX is a 2.0 litre turbo?... kinda difference in torque if you ask me.... subaru had production.. but only for dodge to see the market and give them time to beef up their car.. but it took them like 3 years for them to make a production car that's only a "little" faster than a WRX... by the time subaru see's the stats... the new STI will have come out.. which will totally blow the srt4 outta the water...and have you seen the body styling of the srt4?.. it looks like a wanna-be WRX.... just change the grill and you get the same car... sheesh... i'm sure the neon's has the bug eyes first.. but damn now...WRX's make it look better.. haha...
-Jay
-Jay
02-13-2003 | 11:06 AM
#131
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75
From: summit,NJ
Car Info: 97 OBS
oh yea!... and for another thing.. would you get an srt-4 for 6,000 less?.. or get a pre-owned '01 GC8 body 2.5 rs for 30,000 miles for $13,000... and have another 13,000 lying around.. and hMm... pretty much do everything?... with better handling, stopping power, and HP+torque?... and don't tell me your gonna get a neon for cheaper.. cuz c'mon.. the older neon's were **** as well..... but i'm pretty sure you can get a good price on a neon at a junk yard...
-Jay
-Jay
02-13-2003 | 11:38 AM
#132
Guest
Posts: n/a
The "it's still a Neon" is the same thing we heard from the BMW and the IS300 guys about our "it's just a Subaru"
We do own cars that in the late 70's Subaru advertised as "cheap and built to stay that way"
I for one am excited about the whole performance car market, after a decade of small powerful cars going the way of the Dodo bird, we are having a renaisance in the performance car market with the Advent of the WRX, EVO, SRT4, 350ZX, Focus SVT and all the others I forgot to mention!
We do own cars that in the late 70's Subaru advertised as "cheap and built to stay that way"
I for one am excited about the whole performance car market, after a decade of small powerful cars going the way of the Dodo bird, we are having a renaisance in the performance car market with the Advent of the WRX, EVO, SRT4, 350ZX, Focus SVT and all the others I forgot to mention!
Last edited by Giamilton; 02-13-2003 at 11:54 AM.
02-13-2003 | 05:43 PM
#133
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18
From: Seattle
Car Info: stock USDM '02 WRX, no options, silver metallic
Originally posted by Giamilton
The "it's still a Neon" is the same thing we heard from the BMW and the IS300 guys about our "it's just a Subaru"
The "it's still a Neon" is the same thing we heard from the BMW and the IS300 guys about our "it's just a Subaru"
02-13-2003 | 06:52 PM
#134
Guest
Posts: n/a
LoL it's a Chrysler...
I owned a 94 Dodge Shadow ES NEW mind you and I only made it up to 8k miles before getting rid of it. I never in my life had soo many problems with a car than that POS. All Chrysler cares about is looks and nothing about quality. It seems that way with all American car companies which is why I will NEVER EVER own an American car.
I owned a 94 Dodge Shadow ES NEW mind you and I only made it up to 8k miles before getting rid of it. I never in my life had soo many problems with a car than that POS. All Chrysler cares about is looks and nothing about quality. It seems that way with all American car companies which is why I will NEVER EVER own an American car.
02-13-2003 | 07:09 PM
#135
Guest
Posts: n/a
welll i have to admit after wrecking my car last month thats the only car with power that iam going to be able to afford, for 19,900 , 215hp and 245trq is no bad at all.
i know its a dodge, but i think its how you treat the car, granted i think in my hands maybe a year lol. ill keep you updated when i turn to the darkside..
i know its a dodge, but i think its how you treat the car, granted i think in my hands maybe a year lol. ill keep you updated when i turn to the darkside..