Subaru General Anything about Subaru related that would not be more appropriate in another existing i-Club forum.

Considering WRX need info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2003 | 10:16 PM
  #16  
Steppin Razor's Avatar
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
Originally posted by Boneamania
yeah if its a WRX not an Sti then definitely without a doubt get the Evo, there is no way you can make a w handle, perform and last and long as an evo for less money, BUT if you are talking about Evo vs STi well that is the question everyone asks...and that is up to you, they are both so close. if it was me i would go to the dealers of each in the area and see how you are treated cause that is my deciding factor. i would get an Evo just cause the Subaru dealers around me are a$$holes. if its opposite for you then get the STi. as far as comparable they are as even as you can get. you can argue either car equally.
remember, he said for a daily driver. for anyone other than a teenager or steel-kidneyed person, the suspension on the EVO is just going to be too much. get the wrx, use some of the extra cash for mods and be done with it. also, the STi is an all around better car than the EVO hands down. there can be no questioning that.
Old 05-27-2003 | 10:32 PM
  #18  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally posted by BNR34
I know this is a Subaru forum but, try to be a little more honest and un-biased with his question. The Evo and Sti are so close in performance and handling that it just comes down to price and aesthetics in making a final decision really.

But if your comparing a WRX to an Evo than I think it's more like comparing between night and day. The handling of a stock WRX is no where near the handling of a stock Evo. Sure the Evo is $4-6K more than the WRX but the parts that come with the Evo stock more then make up for the price difference. ie.

Aluminum body-panels
over 150 spot welds to stiffen the chasis
44 more horses
aluminum control arms
huge brembos
inverted struts
recaros
13:1 steering ratio etc...

So if your looking for a comparo between the Evo and the WRX, spend the extra bucks and definitely go for the Evo you won't regret it. But if you want an Sti, then it just pretty much comes down to looks.
Even the STi and Evo, while direct competitiors, aren't really totally similar. The Evo, off the showrom floor, is more prepared for the track, while the STi is the better (relatively speaking) daily driever type vehicle. They are both VERY quick though, so it's almost a matter of which car suits your driving style rather than the car's limits.

Aside from the performance aspect though, every aspect of the cars is in the STi's favor. Better build quality, much better manufacturer rep, nicer interior materials... the whole bag. The Evo shines on the track, the STi on the street. And that, my friend is unbiased.

As for Evo vs. WRX, yeah. no contest. If they were priced the same, it would be different, but it's about 5k more for an Evo. And the things that the STi has in its favor are even more apparent in the standard WRX. It's far more refined.
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:26 PM
  #20  
downshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,013
From: california, LOS ANGELES
Car Info: dream car Subaru STi
hey.. did you guys see the newest issue of sports compact car? evoVIII vs. STi .. guess which car wins... SCC chooses the EVO over the STi. i was suprised. cause i think the STi should of won. anyways... they say the STi wins off the line. but the EVO out handles the STi... sometimes magazine dont make sense t o me... how much better can and EVO handle... and how much worse does the STi handle compared to the EVO..

i mean.. for god sakes the STi's handling can't be so much worse that it lost to the EVO. i still dont understand the magazine..

EVO: 0-60mph is 5.3 seconds. 1/4 13.4 secs

STi: 0-60mph is 4.9 seconds. 1/4 13.1

700ft.slalom speed for evo: 73.1 mph

700ft.slalom speed for STi: 70.7 mph

lap time for evo: 1:37.87
lap time for sti: 1:37.72

ok. yes these two cars are extremely close.. but at the end i see that the STi still wins in lap time and in speed. i would have chosen the STi. "it dont matter if you win by an inch or a mile, winnings winning." hehe that is a great quote to support my thesis statement. STi won by the inch and yet they chose the EVO... wtf..
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:27 PM
  #21  
downshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,013
From: california, LOS ANGELES
Car Info: dream car Subaru STi
Talking

im still buying and STi over the EVO. im going with my instincts
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:33 PM
  #22  
downshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,013
From: california, LOS ANGELES
Car Info: dream car Subaru STi
i think the reason the evo out handles the sti by an "atom" " particle" "inch" "barely much" is because the STi has way more HP and larger engine. STi really should have been number 1 in sport compact car from the way i see it. now ima read sport compact car with less enthusiasm.

handling is very important. but i mean the STi has already passed that test. that line. it handles super. all you need is speed, and thats where the STi dominates.. dumb sports compact car magazine.. they really screwed up this time. bottom line.. the eVO handling isnt much better than the sti... its a tiny tiny inzy bitzy teeny weeny better and i dont see how they chose the EVO! stupid SCC!!! hehe jk not that stupid but stupid on this issue
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:35 PM
  #23  
downshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,013
From: california, LOS ANGELES
Car Info: dream car Subaru STi
yes because the EVO has a teeny weeny intsy bitsy better handling. less hp, slower lap time. slower quarter mile. they choose the EVO!!! hell has frozen over!! hehe jk
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:36 PM
  #24  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
On a smooth, high-speed racetrack, the Evo will post faster times. Based on that, SCC should choose the Evo. Besides, they DID do like 7 installments on project WRX... when was the last time you saw a Mitsu in that mag that wasn't from Japan?
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:44 PM
  #25  
downshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,013
From: california, LOS ANGELES
Car Info: dream car Subaru STi
yes.. but in the magazine.. the Sti posted higher lap time.. also......... yes project WRX was in SCC a lot but im saying they didnt need to finalize.. that the EVO was better than the STi. ... ban suvs.. what are u for? STi or EVO?
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:48 PM
  #26  
downshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,013
From: california, LOS ANGELES
Car Info: dream car Subaru STi
just for that. ima smoke some EVO's with the STi. muahahahahahahahahaha!!!
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:55 PM
  #27  
downshift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,013
From: california, LOS ANGELES
Car Info: dream car Subaru STi
hehehe now to think of it.... muahah...im glad in a way SCC chose the EVO.. that way more people will buy the EVO... muahahahahahahahahahahaha yes buy it buy it!!! hahahahahahaahhaahahahahaaa ... hehehe... muahahahahahahahahaha....buy your EVO people!!



hehehehehehehehehehahahahamuahahahahahaaaaaaa...
Old 05-28-2003 | 12:24 AM
  #28  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally posted by downshift
yes.. but in the magazine.. the Sti posted higher lap time.. also......... yes project WRX was in SCC a lot but im saying they didnt need to finalize.. that the EVO was better than the STi. ... ban suvs.. what are u for? STi or EVO?
STi. I'm not in a position to spend enough time at a racetrack to get my money's worth out of an Evo. And if I were, I'd probably start with a Miata or MR2 Spyder and drop 6,000 into it and smoke both.
Old 05-28-2003 | 08:56 PM
  #30  
Steppin Razor's Avatar
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
Re: Re: Considering WRX need info

Originally posted by Subhuman
Ive driven both, as far as refined the Subaru is hands down the more refined of the two. Thats not slagging on the Evo, it was a blast.
Oh come on!! You have driven both and that's ALL you have to contribute? The Subie's more refined but they're both fun?!?!?! Geez, I could have told you that and I've never sat in either car. Come on, spill the beans.


Quick Reply: Considering WRX need info



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 AM.