Smog results on E85...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2011 | 03:01 PM
  #16  
Double Phister's Avatar
Father Time
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,699
From: You're doing it wrong!
Car Info: This aint a bag. It's a shipment.
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
Currently working on setting up an AEM EMS in this manner using an ethanol sensor

-- Ed
I like the idea of NOT using the sensor.

You don't need to find a home for it.
You won't have to worry about it being a flow restriction (it goes on the return line, if you're making big power with a big pump that's not setup for less than 100% while idleing you'll need to get a ton of bypassed fuel through the sensor).
You won't need to buy a pulse width converter to get a 0-5V signal.

But I do realize its way easier to get working if you use it.
Old 07-22-2011 | 03:18 PM
  #17  
FLYSTI05's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 527
From: Oakland
Car Info: White 05 STI and Silver 05 FXT
very nice
Old 07-22-2011 | 05:21 PM
  #18  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by Double Phister
I like the idea of NOT using the sensor.

You don't need to find a home for it.
You won't have to worry about it being a flow restriction (it goes on the return line, if you're making big power with a big pump that's not setup for less than 100% while idleing you'll need to get a ton of bypassed fuel through the sensor).
You won't need to buy a pulse width converter to get a 0-5V signal.

But I do realize its way easier to get working if you use it.
I agree, it would be nice to be able to do it without the sensor, but there will also be some issues with basing the mapping purely on fuel trims. Mainly, fuel trims may change with varying conditions independent of ethanol content. Secondly, fuel trims will not always be too consistent with very large setups due to injector and airflow inconsistencies. This could pose a big problem if you're really trying to optimize timing and boost for the ethanol.

I also thought about the problem of having to push a lot of fuel through the sensor on the return line. The simplest solution I came up with is to set up the sensor in parallel with the main return line. This way the majority of fuel can flow unrestricted through the main line while the sensor gets enough to sample accurately.

Thanks
-- Ed
Old 07-23-2011 | 03:14 PM
  #19  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
The OEMs have opted to lose the fuel quality sensor as they're unreliable, costly, and not necessary.
But the OEMs have the $$$$ to spend on very sophisticated ECMs and the required algorithms.
Old 07-23-2011 | 04:38 PM
  #20  
SeaOfGreen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 972
From: Sonoma County
Car Info: 2004 WW Evo RS
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
Currently working on setting up an AEM EMS in this manner using an ethanol sensor

-- Ed
Ed, what brand sensor did you choose to use?
Old 07-25-2011 | 09:59 AM
  #21  
Double Phister's Avatar
Father Time
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,699
From: You're doing it wrong!
Car Info: This aint a bag. It's a shipment.
Originally Posted by Paul@dbtuned
The OEMs have opted to lose the fuel quality sensor as they're unreliable, costly, and not necessary.
But the OEMs have the $$$$ to spend on very sophisticated ECMs and the required algorithms.
Some of the cars that originally had the sensor are getting reflashed at the dealer with the new code to go sensorless. Both Ford and GM are doing this.

The first step is to get the maps for both extremes setup and blending via a memory location storing the current ethanol percentage.

This location can then be updated via an actual sensor or some complex fuel trim code I explained above or via a static table that gets flashed after manually measuring the content or even a **** that you turn and monitor via a logger.


The OEMs were using a Siemens sensor. Zeitronix sells it along with a display that outputs a 0-5V signal. The siemens sensor outputs a pulse width signal that represents both fuel temperature and ethanol content. I looked into using an Arduino board to do the conversion but didn't have much luck finding one that supports a pulse input. The Megasquirt ECU can do it. Until I can find an aftermarket ECU that supports OBDII functions (or I stop driving on public roads) I'll be sticking with the OEM ECU.
Zeitronix ECA : SEMA Award Winning Ethanol Content Analyzer and Flex Fuel Sensor for E-85 and E-85/gasoline Blends


Can we get a mod to split this out from the E85 Smog results thread? I don't want to take away the info in both topics by hijacking.
Old 08-06-2011 | 08:08 AM
  #22  
Double Phister's Avatar
Father Time
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,699
From: You're doing it wrong!
Car Info: This aint a bag. It's a shipment.
Originally Posted by Bouncer
Went and got smogged on e85.

If you could fail for emissions being too clean I suspect I would have.. The two smog techs working on it kept saying "Soooo clean???"..

AFR was about as dead nuts stoich as I could make it for the two idle speeds..

Catless up-pipe.. Exhaust was from an 03 with unknown mileage..

E85 ftw again....

For comparison this just happend on E10 and PE850s on an 05 STi. Stock DP.

Code:
            | %CO2  |  %O2  |      HC (PPM)       |       CO(%)        |   
Test | RPM  | MEAS  | MEAS  | MAX  | AVE  | MEAS  | MAX  | AVE  | MEAS |  RESULTS
=================================================================================
Idle   762   13.68     0.9    100     17       4   1.00   0.00    0.01    PASS
2500  2500   14.20     0.0    130     12      12   1.00   0.10    0.18    PASS
Old 08-06-2011 | 09:45 AM
  #23  
alien_refugee's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 473
From: Sacramento CA
Car Info: 02 wrx love-wagon
Originally Posted by Double Phister
For comparison this just happend on E10 and PE850s on an 05 STi. Stock DP.

Code:
            | %CO2  |  %O2  |      HC (PPM)       |       CO(%)        |   
Test | RPM  | MEAS  | MEAS  | MAX  | AVE  | MEAS  | MAX  | AVE  | MEAS |  RESULTS
=================================================================================
Idle   762   13.68     0.9    100     17       4   1.00   0.00    0.01    PASS
2500  2500   14.20     0.0    130     12      12   1.00   0.10    0.18    PASS
nice; I'm going for smog on tuesday, just gotta put stock DP on and give it a tune; also PE850's, E85.
can't wait to see the numbers and compare to my stock numbers from a few years ago
Old 08-06-2011 | 10:12 AM
  #24  
dozenutts's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 520
From: Suisun
Car Info: 2005 STI (sold), 2013 STI, 2014 BURRZ
FWIW here are my results from april of this year. AEM cai, catless up, stock dp, apexi catback, PE 850's on E85.
Attached Thumbnails Smog results on E85...-smog-results.jpg  
Old 08-25-2011 | 04:46 PM
  #25  
XxSti05xX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,633
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 2015 Ford F-150 XLT FX4 Sports Package,SOLD-05 STi
Just went and got smogged today. Passed running E85 and a Helix Catted 3" DP. Also had a Air/Oil Separator on there. Tech never said anything about my DP or the AOS lol
Name:  13053002.jpg
Views: 1081
Size:  71.3 KB

Last edited by XxSti05xX; 08-25-2011 at 05:15 PM.
Old 08-25-2011 | 05:02 PM
  #26  
04caliwrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,581
From: on the way to lake tahoe to shread! turbo beast
Car Info: 2016 WRX, 2014 lifter forester XT, 2005 JDM207 WGN
Nice work Steve!! Clean suby haha
Old 08-25-2011 | 05:05 PM
  #27  
XxSti05xX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,633
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 2015 Ford F-150 XLT FX4 Sports Package,SOLD-05 STi
Originally Posted by 04caliwrx
Nice work Steve!! Clean suby haha
Haha yes it is. I didnt even have to swap out my DP and put on the stock one lol

Last edited by XxSti05xX; 08-26-2011 at 08:51 AM.
Old 08-26-2011 | 07:52 AM
  #28  
Double Phister's Avatar
Father Time
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,699
From: You're doing it wrong!
Car Info: This aint a bag. It's a shipment.
I forgot to look at what the max allowable idle speed was (for a 2.5L). Anybody notice? That's why I had my idle so low.
Old 10-03-2011 | 03:15 PM
  #29  
06blackwrxtr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 191
From: Roseville
Car Info: 06 black wrx
Hey guys-

I'm gonna have to smog my 06 Wrx in June or so, was wondering if people have been passing with a CAT'd aftermarket downpipe. I've got a TurboXS turbo back with their huge CAT in it.

Anyway have any trouble passing with a different TMIC?

Thanks

Jeremy
Old 11-27-2011 | 06:26 PM
  #30  
calitmax's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 417
From: Concord, CA
Car Info: Flared 2007 STI, EQ built and tuned
holy sh*t dude, that's hella good. E85 here I come


Quick Reply: Smog results on E85...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:30 AM.