Yeah? Well at least we're smart enough to link to images that work.

 

But what if the ***** touch?

 

Then you have a short dick or T-Will has a deep ***.

 

Yes, it's working, and never does it say that the building is DEFINETELY collapsing. It says "building 7 on fire, MAY collapse." He does say It is or maybe collapsing, then says no more about it is....

For being in the service, you're pretty dumb when it comes to airplanes. You, along with the other service members and aeronatical enthusiats, should know how fragile an airplane's wings are and how easily they could come off. Especially when hitting a building at over 200+mph. I have seen the footage from the Pentagon, and you can CLEARLY see a small airplane (roughly a 50 person jet plane) flying from right to left. Also, you make claims of Halliburton's stock going up, as if it had never gone up before, or that it was never used. Bill Clinton used Haliburton MORE than Bush/Cheney did in the Afghan war (not Iraq). Also, Bush, after a quick google search, does not have any substantial stake in Halliburton, any links to legitimate news sources are welcome (becuase I didn't find anything).

 

most of the video footage was edited based on frametime, hiding the actualy impact (the toll booth cam) and the video from the hilton and the traffic cameras have all been seized and anyone who saw them has been gagged.
military personel on scene reported the disctinct smell of exposives, id trust them over you.

it was reported early in the day and played on the major networks but it was taken off the air sometime around noon EST. and once again the gag orders. tell what you saw and its treason basicaly

its not the missle the makes the hole its the shape charges of the warhead. depending on the size, shape, and type of exposive used blast for can be directed in any fasion you could image. conically, in a cylinder, a ring, at an angle.


im not saying a missle hit it, im just saying that its possible. occums razer says that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. a plane is the easy explantion. the questions arise when you bring up hwo it passed through the defences untouched, and why video of it hasnt been released.

25-50 years from now when all this **** gets declassified we might find out something. personally i beleive what blew a hole in the pentagon was a clone of Rush Limbah or Anne Coulter on rocketskates... all that hot air pushing in one direction could easily blast through a building

 

oh and anyone that quotes Loose Change as fact needs to be beaten to death with berkenstocks or an imac

 

Along with Fahrenheit 9/11, and An Inconvienient Truth...


And it's well over due, but:

 

its chris jones

 

at least Fahrenheit 911 and Inconvienient Truth were made by professionals and intend to sway people to a way of thinking. they have high production value and al gore makes a good argument for his point of veiw correct or not (moore just montages banned from TV clips).

Loose Change just asks a bunch of questions with easy answers and leaves you with the sense that your 45 minutes could have been better spent beating your head on a wall. not to mention the narration blows, if i ever met those guys in person i punch them out and sign them up for a speech class at a JC while they are unconcious.

i couldnt finish watching it, not because it was so factually weak, but that guys voice made me want to punch a puppy