not to mention the fact that the pentagons air defense system can shoot a mortar out of the sky but it somehow missed a 757? thats the only thing that bothers me about the whole deal. how could an aircraft or projectile pass through the automated defense systems on the pentagon without having an IFF transponder. either hijackers had one from a downed US plane (possible) or it was a friendly military plane or missile

 

the brotherhood of the armed services believing they were being attacked as well as civilians that day.

that would go a long way when you get deployed to a foreign country and why you are there.

 

this is the only statement that i find wrong in your post. the pentagon was designed and upgraded to withstand bombing, missile attack, and whole gauntlet of other things... so how did a compercial plane manage to punch wholes through 3 rungs?

some job of renovating they did.

 

it is a little odd that the plane managed to hit the side they JUST finished remodeling...

 

Because an attack on our soil that killed 3,000+ civilians and took out a major landmark in the rpocess would not be enough but fairly minor damage and a few additional casualties to/in a building they will probably never set foot in makes all the difference? Seriously do you understand how stupid your post sounds?

How many tons at 350+ MPH worth of impact? I think the Pentagon held up quite well under that amount ot stress...

 

The REAL problem is that if some kind of conspiracy were planned there would be HUNDREDS if not THOUSANDS of people that would know... theres no way that many people would agree to something like this.

 

So well infact the windows a few feet from inpact stayed intact

 

please have a basic understanding of physics and / or engineering before analyzing the ammount of damage an airplane should or should not do to a building. also, the WTC and the pentagon are completely different buildings with different types of structure, so it is very logical that they would suffer different fates from similar attacks.

 

Actually service members are much, much more irate over 'cowardice' like attacking the WTC than they are over military targets gettign attacked. From a motivational standpoint, nuking Manhattan is about the only thing they could have done better than the plane thing.

 

What kind of material eats entire planes whole? I suck at teh physics to know

 

Actually, the REAL problem is what they do with the tens and hundrds of thousands of people who say "no thanks."

 

Fire.

 

where did the fire go on these planes?




and I'm glad that the engine in the plane that hit the pentagon wheren't even heat resistant enough to take the heat from the fuel that is used to make the plane run... since they couldn't find the engines to that plane either...

 

I don't see any pentagons in those pictures.


ZOMG YOU FOUND THE MISSING PENTAGON PLANE!!!!!!!

 

WTC held up better on impact than the pentagon did..... and the fact remains that it should not have been hit at all, but somehow an object the size of a football feild got past and punched 6 equal sized holes on each wall of each rung?