California Atty General Sues Car Makers over Global Warming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2006, 11:27 AM
  #1  
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
nachomc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Funtown
Posts: 25,095
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
California Atty General Sues Car Makers over Global Warming

Our state is ****ing embarrassing .


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14924286/

SAN FRANCISCO - California filed suit against the world's largest carmakers on Wednesday, charging that greenhouse gases from their vehicles have cost the state millions of dollars.

State Attorney General Bill Lockyer said the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Northern California was the first of its kind to seek to hold manufacturers liable for the damages caused by their vehicles' emissions.

Lockyer, a Democrat, said the complaint states that under federal and state common law the automakers have created a “public nuisance” by producing “millions of vehicles that collectively emit massive quantities of carbon dioxide.”

Carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases have been linked to global warming.

Lockyer's office said that “under the law, a ‘public nuisance’ is an unreasonable interference with a public right, or an action that interferes with or causes harm to life, health or property.”

“Global warming is causing significant harm to California’s environment, economy, agriculture and public health. The impacts are already costing millions of dollars and the price tag is increasing,” Lockyer said in a statement. “Vehicle emissions are the single most rapidly growing source of the carbon emissions contributing to global warming, yet the federal government and automakers have refused to act. It is time to hold these companies responsible for their contribution to this crisis.”

The lawsuit names Ford, General Motors, Toyota and the North American units of DaimlerChrysler, Honda and Nissan.

Carmakers earlier sued to block a 2005 California law that would require them to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by 2020.

California and 11 other states are also involved in a lawsuit challenging the Bush administration's refusal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The Supreme Court is expected to hear that case during its upcoming term.
nachomc is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 11:30 AM
  #2  
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Brilliant!~
Kevin M is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 11:39 AM
  #3  
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
nachomc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Funtown
Posts: 25,095
Car Info: A limousine with a chauffer
One thing I wanted to point out is that of all the manuf. listed in the suit, Subaru isn't one of them :wiggle:
nachomc is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 11:40 AM
  #4  
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
midnitewrx02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Elk Grove
Posts: 5,064
Car Info: 2006 CGM WRX
Originally Posted by sonicsuby
One thing I wanted to point out is that of all the manuf. listed in the suit, Subaru isn't one of them :wiggle:
cool! so that means i get to go catless right?
midnitewrx02 is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 11:48 AM
  #5  
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
skimonkey30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ya, Ray Romano gets all the chicks.
Posts: 2,952
Car Info: 05 LGT Wagon MT
Originally Posted by sonicsuby
One thing I wanted to point out is that of all the manuf. listed in the suit, Subaru isn't one of them :wiggle:
But i think subaru is now an entity of GM......am i right?
skimonkey30 is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 11:55 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Sky92x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Deep in a secret lair under Denio's.
Posts: 803
Car Info: Bastard child of Saab and Subaru.
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by skimonkey30
But i think subaru is now an entity of GM......am i right?
A few years ago, GM owned 25% of subaru. This made the bastard that is the Saab 92x possible.

GM sold their share before the 2006 model year. (As a result, the 92x's last year is 2006, and doesnt get all the upgrades that the WRX did.)

So the 92x is a rare duck at 15k total production numbers.

wish that helped the resale.
Sky92x is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 11:57 AM
  #7  
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Toyota bought most of the shares that GM sold, IIRC.
Kevin M is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 12:08 PM
  #8  
Troll
iTrader: (6)
 
GT35 STI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In SoggyNoodles Low Rise Pants
Posts: 15,877
Car Info: 2008 Legacy Spec-B
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
Toyota bought most of the shares that GM sold, IIRC.

correct 20% to Toyota... 5% back to Fuji! :banana:
GT35 STI is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 12:09 PM
  #9  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Front pleated TWill pants...
Posts: 10,232
Car Info: 2004 PSM WRX
I think I see the problem.

Lockyer, a Democrat said the complaint states that under federal and state common law the automakers have created a “public nuisance” by producing “millions of vehicles that collectively emit massive quantities of carbon dioxide.”
****ing retards...can Ahnold do anything about this?
T-Will is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 12:21 PM
  #10  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Front pleated TWill pants...
Posts: 10,232
Car Info: 2004 PSM WRX
Oh yeah, and if this isn't bad enough, I'm sure you guys know about the cell phone ban...

http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/fo...040bdc2e729d54
T-Will is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 12:24 PM
  #11  
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally Posted by T-Will
I think I see the problem.



****ing retards...can Ahnold do anything about this?
As if there is a correlation between political affiliation and intelligence. Just look at Dubya...
Kevin M is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 12:25 PM
  #12  
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Kevin M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally Posted by T-Will
Oh yeah, and if this isn't bad enough, I'm sure you guys know about the cell phone ban...

http://www.smartphonethoughts.com/fo...040bdc2e729d54
The best part is that using your hands isn't what makes cell phones unsafe. The distraction of the conversation and the result of your focus being somewhere other than not killing people in your land yacht is.
Kevin M is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 12:28 PM
  #13  
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RussB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: pompous douchebag
Posts: 9,351
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
what's next, suing the motorists for contributing to the fake global warming?

besides, why go after the manufacturers? new cars are far cleaner than older cars.
RussB is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 12:29 PM
  #14  
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Egan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Peoples Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 14,221
Car Info: 05 H2 SUT, 45 GPW, 10 Murano, 13 Boss 302
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
The best part is that using your hands isn't what makes cell phones unsafe. The distraction of the conversation and the result of your focus being somewhere other than not killing people in your land yacht is.
But at least you can put both hands on the wheel now.
Egan is offline  
Old 09-20-2006, 12:30 PM
  #15  
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: pew, pew, pew!!!
Posts: 17,617
Car Info: nonplussed
Originally Posted by RussB
fake global warming?
:rotfl:
ryball is offline  


Quick Reply: California Atty General Sues Car Makers over Global Warming



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:42 PM.