Grand Prix @ K1 Speed San Francisco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2013 | 07:43 PM
  #106  
pho_shizzle's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,542
From: SLZ
Car Info: MY00 GC6 BRP
Originally Posted by DSav408
Who told you that SA was fire proof? It's not. Who told you that SA was better for impacts?

SA uses a higher density foam next to your head, causing more damage in low impact incidents. Like you would get from hitting your head against a window glass and or a roll cage. SA which is Snell Approval, is better for higher speed impacts (80mph~ and above).
Watch out we got a certified safety inspector right here.
Old 01-05-2013 | 07:49 PM
  #107  
DSav408's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,051
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 07 UGM FXT
Originally Posted by pho_shizzle

Watch out we got a certified safety inspector right here.
Never said I was a safety inspector. Why do you cry about anything I post?
Old 01-05-2013 | 07:53 PM
  #108  
PROcede's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,057
From: San Mateo, CA
Car Info: 2015 FXT Stage II
I can do the 27th
Old 01-05-2013 | 10:23 PM
  #109  
Fendyman's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 984
From: South San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2011 Impreza 2.5i Dark Gray Metallic
Originally Posted by JourdanWithaU
So far, the following people are in for the 27th;

1. JourdanWithaU
2. WRaholicX
3. SubbieMedic
4. LxJLthr
5. Shayhan27
6. w0ng3r
7. G_Ride
8. queeg9k
9.
10.
11.
12.
My name isn't on the list.
Old 01-05-2013 | 10:47 PM
  #110  
JZ oo7's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,351
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 1.8L FWD
Originally Posted by DSav408
Who told you that SA was fire proof? It's not. Who told you that SA was better for impacts?

SA uses a higher density foam next to your head, causing more damage in low impact incidents. Like you would get from hitting your head against a window glass and or a roll cage. SA which is Snell Approval, is better for higher speed impacts (80mph~ and above).
So, who told you all that? I never said Snell SA ratings meant fire proof. Nothing is fire proof. Even Nomex isn't fire proof. All these safety equipment will only help keep the temperature at the skin remain low in the case of a fire and only for a X amount of time. Which means it will increase your survivability in the case of being trap in a fire.

If what you said is true about how Snell SA rated helmet causes more damage at low impact incidents, I will continue using them. I would much prefer more damage at low speed impacts than more damage at high speeds. SA rated helmets can protect your head from multiple impacts (ex. a car rolling causing the helmet to have multiple impacts) while M rated helmets will protect your head from one massive impact (ex. falling off a motorcycle and having contact with pavement and then sliding).

If I was to pay the same amount for a M rated and a SA rated helmet, I would rather have a SA rated helmet since I have no plans to ride a motorcycle. Besides, it all comes down to what you feel is right to protect your head. If I'm in high risk situations (rally, road race, open wheel, etc.), you can bet I would be spending the money and use a FIA 8860 homologated helmet.
Old 01-05-2013 | 10:49 PM
  #111  
JZ oo7's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,351
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 1.8L FWD
Originally Posted by Fendyman
My name isn't on the list.
neither am i. Jourdan, don't worry, 14 laps is pretty hard to lap someone.
Old 01-05-2013 | 10:57 PM
  #112  
DSav408's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,051
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 07 UGM FXT
Originally Posted by JZ oo7

So, who told you all that? I never said Snell SA ratings meant fire proof. Nothing is fire proof. Even Nomex isn't fire proof. All these safety equipment will only help keep the temperature at the skin remain low in the case of a fire and only for a X amount of time. Which means it will increase your survivability in the case of being trap in a fire.

If what you said is true about how Snell SA rated helmet causes more damage at low impact incidents, I will continue using them. I would much prefer more damage at low speed impacts than more damage at high speeds. SA rated helmets can protect your head from multiple impacts (ex. a car rolling causing the helmet to have multiple impacts) while M rated helmets will protect your head from one massive impact (ex. falling off a motorcycle and having contact with pavement and then sliding).

If I was to pay the same amount for a M rated and a SA rated helmet, I would rather have a SA rated helmet since I have no plans to ride a motorcycle. Besides, it all comes down to what you feel is right to protect your head. If I'm in high risk situations (rally, road race, open wheel, etc.), you can bet I would be spending the money and use a FIA 8860 homologated helmet.
Agreed with the fire proof comment!

Yes, but you will never have an impact at the same speed twice. It's not possible. But I see your point.

Whatever people feel most comfortable with! At least you do your research. Most people assume all helmet technologies are the same. But you'd know about in-molding vs shell and foam being separate!

At least you're staying safe.
Old 01-06-2013 | 02:51 AM
  #113  
pho_shizzle's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,542
From: SLZ
Car Info: MY00 GC6 BRP
Originally Posted by DSav408
Never said I was a safety inspector. Why do you cry about anything I post?
You call that crying. LOL!!!!!!!!
Old 01-06-2013 | 03:01 PM
  #114  
DSav408's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,051
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 07 UGM FXT
Originally Posted by pho_shizzle
You call that crying. LOL!!!!!!!!
: wavey:
Old 01-07-2013 | 11:56 AM
  #115  
JourdanWithaU's Avatar
Thread Starter
It's QQ thankyouverymuch
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 19,721
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2011 SWP WRX Hatch
Ok, I just got off the phone with K1 (sorry for the lag) We have January 27th at 5:00 pm. They ask that we arrive 15 minutes prior to get everyone checked in. Also, everyone can pay for themselves as they arrive. I booked the Regular Grand Prix which is $60. I told them that we have at least 8, but no more than 12.

People on the list:

1. JourdanWithaU
2. WRaholicX
3. SubbieMedic
4. LxJLthr
5. w0ng3r
6. G_Ride
7. queeg9k
8. JZ oo7
9. PROcede
10. Fendyman
11.
12.
Old 01-07-2013 | 12:24 PM
  #116  
PROcede's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,057
From: San Mateo, CA
Car Info: 2015 FXT Stage II
Didn't realize it was going to be so late . I'm out I have a birthday dinner to attend at 5pm.
Old 01-07-2013 | 03:35 PM
  #117  
SubbieMedic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 315
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 2012 WRB WRX
Way to be a lamer! Tell them the party doesn't start until you say it starts... At 7!
Old 01-07-2013 | 04:53 PM
  #118  
w0ng3r's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,856
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 2011 WRX Sedan
Originally Posted by PROcede
Didn't realize it was going to be so late . I'm out I have a birthday dinner to attend at 5pm.
Yeah... Who's birthday is it? Iclub gets you decide if you have to go or not

Sent from my Nexus 4 using i-Club
Old 01-07-2013 | 05:26 PM
  #119  
PROcede's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,057
From: San Mateo, CA
Car Info: 2015 FXT Stage II
Make it earlier

Last edited by PROcede; 01-07-2013 at 05:59 PM.
Old 01-07-2013 | 05:49 PM
  #120  
JourdanWithaU's Avatar
Thread Starter
It's QQ thankyouverymuch
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 19,721
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2011 SWP WRX Hatch
Have ever been so far as do more want like?


Quick Reply: Grand Prix @ K1 Speed San Francisco



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:36 AM.