Thunder_STI**Final Dyno Results**As of Today**
#16
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Thanks; I'm currently on pump gas map...425...and I finally had a chance to throw all 6 gears...
Behind my house I have an abandon airport...
I have launched the beast and holy **** that thing pulled like a bull....Good feeling....
Later this week, I will conducting my 1st burn-out ever in an AWD car. Hopefully it works out, will take video..lol
Behind my house I have an abandon airport...
I have launched the beast and holy **** that thing pulled like a bull....Good feeling....
Later this week, I will conducting my 1st burn-out ever in an AWD car. Hopefully it works out, will take video..lol
#21
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
Those whp numbers don't suprise me given your tuner and 2.5 displacement, but wondering about the torque numbers. I would have guessed they'd be higher. Anything I'm missing? My torque numbers on a 2.0 are higher than my whp numbers. Running similar boost on pump and less boost on 50/50 C16/pump. I'm a full 500+ lbs lighter and actually feel torque steer under hard acceleration. I don't drag, so I can't compare apples to oranges. Nice numbers and be sure to hook me up with any cute cousins (didn't want to insult any of your sisters). J/K, don't send out a hitman. Drop me a line or pm me for more detailed discussions. I think with your anticipated new parts you'll be making big power, but more importantly revving higher and accelerating more quickly. Revving higher on the 2.5 is more important in my opinion. The 2.5 runs out of breath around 5K or so, unless you have a monster turbo (like you have). Very smooth curve, your tuner deserves maximum credit. I could ramble on, but there are beers in the refrigerator and I outprocess the Air Force tomorrow. Time to get paid!
San
San
#22
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Those whp numbers don't suprise me given your tuner and 2.5 displacement, but wondering about the torque numbers. I would have guessed they'd be higher. Anything I'm missing? My torque numbers on a 2.0 are higher than my whp numbers. Running similar boost on pump and less boost on 50/50 C16/pump. I'm a full 500+ lbs lighter and actually feel torque steer under hard acceleration. I don't drag, so I can't compare apples to oranges. Nice numbers and be sure to hook me up with any cute cousins (didn't want to insult any of your sisters). J/K, don't send out a hitman. Drop me a line or pm me for more detailed discussions. I think with your anticipated new parts you'll be making big power, but more importantly revving higher and accelerating more quickly. Revving higher on the 2.5 is more important in my opinion. The 2.5 runs out of breath around 5K or so, unless you have a monster turbo (like you have). Very smooth curve, your tuner deserves maximum credit. I could ramble on, but there are beers in the refrigerator and I outprocess the Air Force tomorrow. Time to get paid!
San
San
As for stock internals that is the most we can get out of, Keep in mind the injectors were at 85%. Giving a gap of 15% error margin for safety.
But next month we will be installing:
Pistons, Rods, springs, valves, cams and heads. We will be over 600awhp.
I dont know whay your comment but thanks anyways.
Thats a 10sec. car. No doubt about it. Gadiel is the best tuner always thinking safety at all times. Thats why he did not maxed oput the injectors.
Thanks Much
Jose
#23
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
519awhp @ 29.xx lbs of boost
425awhp @ 20lbs of boost
I think thats awesome w/ stock internals. Y
You can even check out the fellas of nasioc, Thay have those numbers but the are running meth, shortblock, etc, etc...
425awhp @ 20lbs of boost
I think thats awesome w/ stock internals. Y
You can even check out the fellas of nasioc, Thay have those numbers but the are running meth, shortblock, etc, etc...
#24
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Those whp numbers don't suprise me given your tuner and 2.5 displacement, but wondering about the torque numbers. I would have guessed they'd be higher. Anything I'm missing? My torque numbers on a 2.0 are higher than my whp numbers. Running similar boost on pump and less boost on 50/50 C16/pump. I'm a full 500+ lbs lighter and actually feel torque steer under hard acceleration. I don't drag, so I can't compare apples to oranges. Nice numbers and be sure to hook me up with any cute cousins (didn't want to insult any of your sisters). J/K, don't send out a hitman. Drop me a line or pm me for more detailed discussions. I think with your anticipated new parts you'll be making big power, but more importantly revving higher and accelerating more quickly. Revving higher on the 2.5 is more important in my opinion. The 2.5 runs out of breath around 5K or so, unless you have a monster turbo (like you have). Very smooth curve, your tuner deserves maximum credit. I could ramble on, but there are beers in the refrigerator and I outprocess the Air Force tomorrow. Time to get paid!
San
San
Also; Bring your car over here and we can line up at the tracks, so we can do a friendly run. I'll show you whats the real power.
Theres always a hater, someone under estimating but it's all good. Thats life of a beauty.
lol
Jose
#25
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
No hating here, I was just curious about the torque numbers. My torque is higher than my whp on either map, just wondering why your whp was considerably higher than your torque. Also, are you going to upgrade the injectors given they're nearly maxed? If I could afford to come over there I'd have your tuner give my car the once over, but I need to find a new job and look for a house right now. Again, not sure what brought out the "hater" comment, but that wasn't my intent. Very smooth dyno plot and again props to your tuner.
San
San
#26
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
I was looking at various dyno charts and couldn't find any where the whp was higher than torque. Just wondering if it was calibrated differently on the dyno you're on or what. Just curious. Damn smooth whp and torque graphs. Looks like very meticulous tuning..
San
San
#28
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Wasssup San;
It's all good bro!!!
I dont kn0ow what Gadiel did but atleast in my eyes he did a superb excelent work.
Pump gas: 425whp I ran last week 11.9@112 w/my ****ty federal tires
VP(C16) 520whp: Thursday will be my 1st run on vp, Hoping for great results.
Jose
#30
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
Like I said, the curves look very smooth. Maybe he's purposely keeping the torque lower to save the transmission. Perhaps you could get him to chime in. I'm not looking to line up next to a big turbo with a 2.5L motor for a drag race, but an open track session with corners would probably suprise you. I would definately like a ride in your beast, but geographical distances would probably preclude that. Keep us updated on mods and times. Adios.
San
San