Thunder_STI**Final Dyno Results**As of Today**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2007, 06:46 AM
  #16  
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
thunder_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Thanks; I'm currently on pump gas map...425...and I finally had a chance to throw all 6 gears...

Behind my house I have an abandon airport...

I have launched the beast and holy **** that thing pulled like a bull....Good feeling....

Later this week, I will conducting my 1st burn-out ever in an AWD car. Hopefully it works out, will take video..lol
thunder_sti is offline  
Old 05-13-2007, 08:59 AM
  #17  
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
.:: 808 STi ::.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: on da compz...readin' yo blogz
Posts: 4,990
Car Info: "the loud one"
good job jose!
.:: 808 STi ::. is offline  
Old 05-13-2007, 12:40 PM
  #18  
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
thunder_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Thanks Randy!!!!

Cant wait to put on them Nitto555r Tires and take it down the 1/4mile...
thunder_sti is offline  
Old 05-13-2007, 09:19 PM
  #19  
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
 
IS2Scooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land of Rocks
Posts: 26,618
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
Wow.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
IS2Scooby is offline  
Old 05-14-2007, 12:37 PM
  #20  
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
thunder_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
^^^ Thanks Much ^^^ So far so good; Cant wait to go down the 1/4..
thunder_sti is offline  
Old 05-14-2007, 08:44 PM
  #21  
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
oldmansan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
Those whp numbers don't suprise me given your tuner and 2.5 displacement, but wondering about the torque numbers. I would have guessed they'd be higher. Anything I'm missing? My torque numbers on a 2.0 are higher than my whp numbers. Running similar boost on pump and less boost on 50/50 C16/pump. I'm a full 500+ lbs lighter and actually feel torque steer under hard acceleration. I don't drag, so I can't compare apples to oranges. Nice numbers and be sure to hook me up with any cute cousins (didn't want to insult any of your sisters). J/K, don't send out a hitman. Drop me a line or pm me for more detailed discussions. I think with your anticipated new parts you'll be making big power, but more importantly revving higher and accelerating more quickly. Revving higher on the 2.5 is more important in my opinion. The 2.5 runs out of breath around 5K or so, unless you have a monster turbo (like you have). Very smooth curve, your tuner deserves maximum credit. I could ramble on, but there are beers in the refrigerator and I outprocess the Air Force tomorrow. Time to get paid!

San
oldmansan is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 01:45 AM
  #22  
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
thunder_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Originally Posted by oldmansan
Those whp numbers don't suprise me given your tuner and 2.5 displacement, but wondering about the torque numbers. I would have guessed they'd be higher. Anything I'm missing? My torque numbers on a 2.0 are higher than my whp numbers. Running similar boost on pump and less boost on 50/50 C16/pump. I'm a full 500+ lbs lighter and actually feel torque steer under hard acceleration. I don't drag, so I can't compare apples to oranges. Nice numbers and be sure to hook me up with any cute cousins (didn't want to insult any of your sisters). J/K, don't send out a hitman. Drop me a line or pm me for more detailed discussions. I think with your anticipated new parts you'll be making big power, but more importantly revving higher and accelerating more quickly. Revving higher on the 2.5 is more important in my opinion. The 2.5 runs out of breath around 5K or so, unless you have a monster turbo (like you have). Very smooth curve, your tuner deserves maximum credit. I could ramble on, but there are beers in the refrigerator and I outprocess the Air Force tomorrow. Time to get paid!

San


As for stock internals that is the most we can get out of, Keep in mind the injectors were at 85%. Giving a gap of 15% error margin for safety.


But next month we will be installing:

Pistons, Rods, springs, valves, cams and heads. We will be over 600awhp.


I dont know whay your comment but thanks anyways.


Thats a 10sec. car. No doubt about it. Gadiel is the best tuner always thinking safety at all times. Thats why he did not maxed oput the injectors.


Thanks Much

Jose
thunder_sti is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 01:48 AM
  #23  
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
thunder_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
519awhp @ 29.xx lbs of boost

425awhp @ 20lbs of boost


I think thats awesome w/ stock internals. Y

You can even check out the fellas of nasioc, Thay have those numbers but the are running meth, shortblock, etc, etc...
thunder_sti is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 01:50 AM
  #24  
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
thunder_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Originally Posted by oldmansan
Those whp numbers don't suprise me given your tuner and 2.5 displacement, but wondering about the torque numbers. I would have guessed they'd be higher. Anything I'm missing? My torque numbers on a 2.0 are higher than my whp numbers. Running similar boost on pump and less boost on 50/50 C16/pump. I'm a full 500+ lbs lighter and actually feel torque steer under hard acceleration. I don't drag, so I can't compare apples to oranges. Nice numbers and be sure to hook me up with any cute cousins (didn't want to insult any of your sisters). J/K, don't send out a hitman. Drop me a line or pm me for more detailed discussions. I think with your anticipated new parts you'll be making big power, but more importantly revving higher and accelerating more quickly. Revving higher on the 2.5 is more important in my opinion. The 2.5 runs out of breath around 5K or so, unless you have a monster turbo (like you have). Very smooth curve, your tuner deserves maximum credit. I could ramble on, but there are beers in the refrigerator and I outprocess the Air Force tomorrow. Time to get paid!

San


Also; Bring your car over here and we can line up at the tracks, so we can do a friendly run. I'll show you whats the real power.

Theres always a hater, someone under estimating but it's all good. Thats life of a beauty.

lol

Jose
thunder_sti is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 07:18 PM
  #25  
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
oldmansan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
No hating here, I was just curious about the torque numbers. My torque is higher than my whp on either map, just wondering why your whp was considerably higher than your torque. Also, are you going to upgrade the injectors given they're nearly maxed? If I could afford to come over there I'd have your tuner give my car the once over, but I need to find a new job and look for a house right now. Again, not sure what brought out the "hater" comment, but that wasn't my intent. Very smooth dyno plot and again props to your tuner.

San
oldmansan is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 07:42 PM
  #26  
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
oldmansan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
I was looking at various dyno charts and couldn't find any where the whp was higher than torque. Just wondering if it was calibrated differently on the dyno you're on or what. Just curious. Damn smooth whp and torque graphs. Looks like very meticulous tuning..

San
oldmansan is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 07:53 PM
  #27  
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
luktang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the mat
Posts: 5,544
Car Info: 04 PSM WRX
Good stuff Jose, those are some sick numbers! Make us proud mang!
luktang is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 09:10 PM
  #28  
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
thunder_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by oldmansan
I was looking at various dyno charts and couldn't find any where the whp was higher than torque. Just wondering if it was calibrated differently on the dyno you're on or what. Just curious. Damn smooth whp and torque graphs. Looks like very meticulous tuning..

San

Wasssup San;

It's all good bro!!!

I dont kn0ow what Gadiel did but atleast in my eyes he did a superb excelent work.

Pump gas: 425whp I ran last week 11.9@112 w/my ****ty federal tires

VP(C16) 520whp: Thursday will be my 1st run on vp, Hoping for great results.

Jose
thunder_sti is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 09:11 PM
  #29  
Troll
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
thunder_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ***10 SEC CLUB*** 10.8@128mph w/clutch issues
Posts: 3,526
Car Info: 04 STI--- 435awhp@Pump Gas **520awhp @ C16 Vp
Originally Posted by luktang
Good stuff Jose, those are some sick numbers! Make us proud mang!
Thanks bro!!! How you been ??/
thunder_sti is offline  
Old 05-15-2007, 10:16 PM
  #30  
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
oldmansan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
Like I said, the curves look very smooth. Maybe he's purposely keeping the torque lower to save the transmission. Perhaps you could get him to chime in. I'm not looking to line up next to a big turbo with a 2.5L motor for a drag race, but an open track session with corners would probably suprise you. I would definately like a ride in your beast, but geographical distances would probably preclude that. Keep us updated on mods and times. Adios.

San
oldmansan is offline  


Quick Reply: Thunder_STI**Final Dyno Results**As of Today**



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:11 PM.