thinking of buying a front mount
#16
the amount of volume you add with piping, increased intercooler volume etc is what leads to more lag. the smallish stock turbo has a hard time coping with moving the large volumes of air that an aftermarket turbo can do in spades. nothing to do with boost pressures or ball bearings, just simple fluid dynamics.
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ewa Beach Hawaii
Posts: 1,049
Car Info: 2015 CWP STI
That's why i suggested for the hot side piping ID to be much smaller than pre-made kits, if not, matching the compressor outlet of the turbo to increase the air velocity. The pre-made kits are designed for more head room to allow turbo upgrades.
#18
the lag is a myth.... my fmic is an ebay cxracing kit starts at 2in fron the turbo up to 2.75". the core is 24x12x3.. throttle response is slower but no lag.. sheit i have logs of me hitting boost cut (which is 18.4psi) at 2800 stock td04
#19
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: your bfs car
Posts: 1,459
Car Info: grandmas car
Written by Reid:
The real problem is the MAF lag, especially for those with fast spooling turbos and larger injectors. You get a pig RICH condition that’s difficult to tune out because it’s a timing issue with the injectors reacting too quickly. I’ve seen it done, but the problem is usually reduced but not eliminated. There’s a latency in the system to allow for the stock inlet and stock TMIC. When you change the volume or timing from when the MAF registers the air and when the air enters the chamber, you get a timing/latency problem.
Tuners often see the car go from 14.7 to 10.0-1 or even richer to 9.8-1. And it’s that rich condition that feels like lag. The car goes dead for a brief second and then when it leans out as the timing is correct, the car feels okay again. It’s more apparent with stock turbos running larger injectors. But like I said, it's possible to minimize if the tuner spends time in the car and plays with it, but it requires a lot of logging and street driving in different gears. You won't get that from a dyno tune.
On large turbos, it’s not a problem because they spool more slowly anyway, allowing the timing to not have a big differential. But a lot of the feeling is there. That’s why you can measure very little lag, but you feel the response suck it big time.
You can simulate the condition if you step on it, let it hit full boost and watch your wideband and then let off and do it again.
You'll see a rich spike
Just FYI
The real problem is the MAF lag, especially for those with fast spooling turbos and larger injectors. You get a pig RICH condition that’s difficult to tune out because it’s a timing issue with the injectors reacting too quickly. I’ve seen it done, but the problem is usually reduced but not eliminated. There’s a latency in the system to allow for the stock inlet and stock TMIC. When you change the volume or timing from when the MAF registers the air and when the air enters the chamber, you get a timing/latency problem.
Tuners often see the car go from 14.7 to 10.0-1 or even richer to 9.8-1. And it’s that rich condition that feels like lag. The car goes dead for a brief second and then when it leans out as the timing is correct, the car feels okay again. It’s more apparent with stock turbos running larger injectors. But like I said, it's possible to minimize if the tuner spends time in the car and plays with it, but it requires a lot of logging and street driving in different gears. You won't get that from a dyno tune.
On large turbos, it’s not a problem because they spool more slowly anyway, allowing the timing to not have a big differential. But a lot of the feeling is there. That’s why you can measure very little lag, but you feel the response suck it big time.
You can simulate the condition if you step on it, let it hit full boost and watch your wideband and then let off and do it again.
You'll see a rich spike
Just FYI
Last edited by dysfunctnl doll; 09-10-2009 at 02:22 PM.
#21
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ewa Beach Hawaii
Posts: 1,049
Car Info: 2015 CWP STI
howzdawagon, don't be afraid of the ebay FMICs, they're not as bad as you think. They have good build quality next to the big names, no one that I know who has them had a problem with it. Most of the good ones are bar and plate design. Tube and fin type ebay FMICs arent that great. And most of all, they're affordable.
#22
Registered User
Thread Starter
howzdawagon, don't be afraid of the ebay FMICs, they're not as bad as you think. They have good build quality next to the big names, no one that I know who has them had a problem with it. Most of the good ones are bar and plate design. Tube and fin type ebay FMICs arent that great. And most of all, they're affordable.
#24
#25
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ewa Beach Hawaii
Posts: 1,049
Car Info: 2015 CWP STI
I've been playing with my tune since last October and finally caught on a couple months ago. I had to lean my fuel corrections alot in that area to raise the AFR's a bit. Reid is right how it can't be eliminated, but reduced. I learned alot from my dyno runs at MunkyWurks.
Last edited by joejoe69; 09-11-2009 at 02:02 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
datwrx
Wheel & Tire
9
02-23-2004 05:24 PM