TGV Deletes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2008, 12:44 AM
  #16  
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
oldmansan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
Originally Posted by simontempler
sorry.. 'chibby'?
Chibby Goku, GOKU 4, (Chris).

San
oldmansan is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 12:45 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
simontempler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 310
Car Info: 05 LGT
Originally Posted by oldmansan
Chibby Goku, GOKU 4, (Chris).

San
thanks! Will send him a PM.
simontempler is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 12:50 AM
  #18  
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
islandboy78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: EWA BOUND!!!!
Posts: 565
Car Info: 05 SUBARU WRX
Originally Posted by islandboy78
very nice got the same ones and installed them is very easy, I also got my intake manifold p-n-p from grimm and everything matches...
I totally agree everything i mean everything matches up, totally freaked me out when I was installing mines. are you going to install yours, if so I can hook you up with pointers if you like...
islandboy78 is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 12:56 AM
  #19  
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
oldmansan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
Originally Posted by simontempler
thanks! Will send him a PM.
No problem. My insomnia is your advantage (I'm in CA).

San
oldmansan is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 12:58 AM
  #20  
banned
iTrader: (1)
 
reid-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: .
Posts: 347
Car Info: .
I feel that the TGV are a restriction, and so I don't really see it as adding power per se...as a larger turbo would add power; you're removing a restriction that should have never been there in the first place.

The TGV inlet is a restriction and isn't there on the jdm manifolds, and their stuff always flows better than ours.

I would say that, other than going with a bigger turbo, this is really the only thing left you can do.
reid-o is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 02:25 AM
  #21  
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
ReleaseDaKraken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ハワイ諸島
Posts: 518
Car Info: kitanai kuroi kuruma
Originally Posted by simontempler
Any benefits or a waste of money? Are the power gains worth the moola?

Just readin' up on it and looking at Grimmspeed.

Chris (Substitude), I see you got one.. pending installation. What do you know about it?

Does anyone have theirs installed and what are your comments.

TIA!
Did them, don't know if they make a difference or not. I would think that they only really come into play on bigger sized turbos like a gt35r. I dunno, my car is slow .

Originally Posted by reid-o
The driveability issues that people have are from doing them without a remap; in other words, it's nothing Jarrad can't handle.
My car stutters alot on cold starts until the engine warms up, then it drives normal after that. I dunno if Jarrad can tune out the the cold start stuttering. I was tuned by him twice, but then again I never asked him about it.
ReleaseDaKraken is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 09:44 AM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
simontempler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 310
Car Info: 05 LGT
Overall, the consensus here appears to be quite favorable towards the TGV deletes.

Seems it works very well at the top end. How does it affect the bottom - torque?
simontempler is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 10:16 AM
  #23  
banned
iTrader: (1)
 
reid-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: .
Posts: 347
Car Info: .
I'm not sure what the effect would be. I'd assume there would be some loss down low, as it's going to affect velocity. Just remember that the effect won't be the same as a new header or a new turbo.
I think that the power gain would be within 8-12whp or so. I'd favor the 8 more than the 12 though. Some people would say money wise that it's not a worthwhile gain. My point is that there probably will be a gain, because you're eliminating a known choke point, but it's just relative to what you think is worth it.

Last edited by reid-o; 11-26-2008 at 10:20 AM.
reid-o is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 10:35 AM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
simontempler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 310
Car Info: 05 LGT
Just spoke with Grimmspeed.

There will be a slight loss at the low end but 'significant' gains up top.

Reid-o, too bad factory turbos don't come this good.
If they were, It will put Subaru on the map.

I'm starting to think it is worth it.
simontempler is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 10:51 AM
  #25  
banned
iTrader: (1)
 
reid-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: .
Posts: 347
Car Info: .
Originally Posted by simontempler
Just spoke with Grimmspeed.

There will be a slight loss at the low end but 'significant' gains up top.

Reid-o, too bad factory turbos don't come this good.
If they were, It will put Subaru on the map.

I'm starting to think it is worth it.

We used to complain about the factory turbo selection from the factory for Evos and DSMs. It's a simple fact that the American consumer likes low end torque, or why else would there be tons of threads on the word "spool?"


Engineers always base their selections on driving taste and polls because if you look at the JDM selections, their curves are much peakier than ours and they generally put up with less torque and response for better top end.

One of the best street turbos for 2.0l subarus and for older 4g63 is the EVO3, which is a stock JDM part. The USDMs DSMs got the crappy 14b and the Subarus got the td04 from the factory. lol

Last edited by reid-o; 11-26-2008 at 10:54 AM.
reid-o is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 11:05 AM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
simontempler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 310
Car Info: 05 LGT
I hear ya.

I suppose with the new TGV installed... A tune is a definite must?
simontempler is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 11:12 AM
  #27  
banned
iTrader: (1)
 
reid-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: .
Posts: 347
Car Info: .
You can probably run fine without them.
Just makes sure they do a final boost leak test after they pull the manifold off and put it back.
You may also want to think about the phenolic spacers.
I honestly don't know if the spacers are worth it, but it seems logical since they'll doing work in there anyway.


Requesting the boost leak test after the manifold is off is important. It's easy to get injector seal leaks. Jimi's pretty much an expert at tracking leaks I think, so he'll know what to do

Last edited by reid-o; 11-26-2008 at 12:30 PM.
reid-o is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 01:28 PM
  #28  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
simontempler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 310
Car Info: 05 LGT
Roger that, Reid-o!
simontempler is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 08:29 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
zer0shift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 139
Car Info: 2007 STi GTX3076R
I also have the grimmspeed TGV Deletes. I can't compare them on my car to not on my car. But I do think they help on the top end for us big turbo guys. Grimmspeed makes nice products and you can send in your core. I paid the full then send in my core and they gave me back the core fee. It was like 140bucks. I don't regret buying them.
zer0shift is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 10:42 PM
  #30  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
simontempler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 310
Car Info: 05 LGT
I'm convinced that the good outweighs the 'bad.'

I'm going for it, and I'm going custom.. shouldn't be too hard, ya?

Thanks Folks, for all the input to help me make my decision. Can't see any reason not to, really...
simontempler is offline  


Quick Reply: TGV Deletes



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:49 PM.