evo mr vs. sti comparision
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hawaii, Mililani
Posts: 542
Car Info: 2006 STI, Grey
evo mr vs. sti comparision
http://magazine-directory.com/Road-Track.htm
Well just been doing some read up on it.
Thought you guys wanted to see this.
Well just been doing some read up on it.
Thought you guys wanted to see this.
#7
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 12,522
Car Info: 1997 Acura Integra GS Sedan
I mean, being realistic...
at the moment, the new MR is a better car than the current STi. They already had us suspension wise...and with this new turbo, they gettin us on the performance side...like I've said a few times before, Subaru's gotta do a major step up...
at the moment, the new MR is a better car than the current STi. They already had us suspension wise...and with this new turbo, they gettin us on the performance side...like I've said a few times before, Subaru's gotta do a major step up...
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Da North Shore
Posts: 1,897
Car Info: '04 STi
The comparison between the EVO IX and the current model STI is like splitting hairs. Although Road & Track chose the EVO, Motor Trend chose the STI. All in all, they are two great cars in a class all by themselves.
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Da North Shore
Posts: 1,897
Car Info: '04 STi
The comparison between the EVO IX and the current STI is like splitting hairs. Although Road & Track chose the EVO, Motor Trend chose The STI as the better car, with the STI being the more rewarding car to drive. All in all, they are just two great cars in a class all by themselves.
#11
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...q=top+gear+sti
anyone know how i can save this to my hard drive?
anyone know how i can save this to my hard drive?
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kapolei, Hawaii
Posts: 610
Car Info: 2005 WRB STi
Wow the boost lag was the funiest thing I have ever seen, clutch was bad, and the turning radius was so small. Sure the MR is fast but its only worth it under the right gear, I would stick to my STi any other day.
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
I
own a Subaru, but I'm not blind to other cars. The Evo is at least 100 pounds lighter than the STI (and that's being nice), has almost identical hp with .5 liter less displacement, and by all accounts handles better. The boxer engine puts weight lower, but is a pain to work on. The exhaust piping is long, where the Evo piping makes use of a FMIC (stock) a no-brainer. Modding an Evo is fairly cheap also. If you own an STI, it's a great car. But the fact that you own one doesn't make the Evo inferior. They're both great cars. Open your eyes and you'll see one isn't better than the other, they both have their own advantages. Watch out for that WRX in your rearview, it might be me.
San
San
#15
VIP Member
iTrader: (38)
Originally Posted by oldmansan
own a Subaru, but I'm not blind to other cars. The Evo is at least 100 pounds lighter than the STI (and that's being nice), has almost identical hp with .5 liter less displacement, and by all accounts handles better. The boxer engine puts weight lower, but is a pain to work on. The exhaust piping is long, where the Evo piping makes use of a FMIC (stock) a no-brainer. Modding an Evo is fairly cheap also. If you own an STI, it's a great car. But the fact that you own one doesn't make the Evo inferior. They're both great cars. Open your eyes and you'll see one isn't better than the other, they both have their own advantages. Watch out for that WRX in your rearview, it might be me.
San
San