Been thinking of my intermittent leaness problem...
#1
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,133
From: Lastweek Lane - Watertown, NY
Car Info: 02WRXpseudoSTiWannabeWagon
Been thinking of my intermittent leaness problem...
http://www.ravensblade-impreza.com/m.../fuelrail.html
Haven't actually read it yet, but it sounds exciting.
Haven't actually read it yet, but it sounds exciting.
#2
Big Baller
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,821
From: Washington
Car Info: 93 BG5, 00&01 GM6, 06LGT, 07STi
I have part of a ludespeed kit. You just need to bore out the hole a little bit to fit the fpr and get one fitting and you'll be set.
It's easier than pulling off your manifold and cheaper.
It's easier than pulling off your manifold and cheaper.
#3
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...hreadid=422495
Cliff's Notes: No need, Cuz!
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Cliff's Notes: No need, Cuz!
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#5
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
Right. But the point of the mod is that there is "uneven fuel distribution" correct? Well it's provent that the stock rail without mods is good for some serious horsepower.
I'm not debating one mod vs. the other (aftermarket rails vs. stock rail mod) but rather the necessity of any fuel rail mod.
Going parallel shouldn't hurt, but doing a lot of stuff that shouldn't hurt for dubious benefit is work wasted in my book.
I'm more wary of the cooling design than I am the fueling. I'm dropping in a bottle of Water Wetter next chance I get that's for sure!
I still want somebody to flow all the ports on a GDA EJ20 manifold to see if there's equitable flow.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
I'm not debating one mod vs. the other (aftermarket rails vs. stock rail mod) but rather the necessity of any fuel rail mod.
Going parallel shouldn't hurt, but doing a lot of stuff that shouldn't hurt for dubious benefit is work wasted in my book.
I'm more wary of the cooling design than I am the fueling. I'm dropping in a bottle of Water Wetter next chance I get that's for sure!
I still want somebody to flow all the ports on a GDA EJ20 manifold to see if there's equitable flow.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#6
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
Relevant info:
I think converting the fuel rail feed to parallel is a good idea. But is it worth the hassle? Well, not for me at least... For someone looking to add another project to their "to do list" it's probably a worthwhile endeavor.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Even on 400+ whp setups I never change them. Usually they make things worse and uneven mixture is not caused by the fuel rails anyway but rather from the intake manifold and head design. Save your money.
there is absolutely no need to larger than stock fuel rails. period. The leaning out problem is not due to insufficient flow of the factory rails. The diameter of the factory rail is about the same as the fuel line on a V8 carb that would feed an entire 8 cyl engine making over 800 HP. And you think your wrx making 400hp needs more fuel than that for 2 cyls??? Get off the crack.
Larger fuel rails cause more tuning headaches than they fix. They are so much larger than what you actually need that they now create even MORE uneven flow to each injector.
The factory rails flow more than enough fuel, dont waste your money
Larger fuel rails cause more tuning headaches than they fix. They are so much larger than what you actually need that they now create even MORE uneven flow to each injector.
The factory rails flow more than enough fuel, dont waste your money
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#8
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,133
From: Lastweek Lane - Watertown, NY
Car Info: 02WRXpseudoSTiWannabeWagon
To me, it's an issue of troubleshooting. There are so many potentials that I seriously need to be careful in which direction to go in fixing it. It might just be an issue of the current tune being deficient.
To be honest, where I have been leaning is in tackling the long term fuel trim. I haven't even researched how to do it, but I've found some very good resources to read.
To be honest, where I have been leaning is in tackling the long term fuel trim. I haven't even researched how to do it, but I've found some very good resources to read.
#9
Big Baller
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,821
From: Washington
Car Info: 93 BG5, 00&01 GM6, 06LGT, 07STi
Looking at the Easy Street car in PA over the weekend they are using factory fuel rails with a modified fuel lines delivering fuel to them
Aftermarket fuel rails=NOT NEEDED (we agree)
Parallel fuel lines to the rails= needed.
The modified lines they are talking about on the easystreet wrx IS/ARE the Parallel modification because it's important to get equal fuel pressure and flow to all the injectors.
#10
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
You're right. We ARE talking about different things.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Toiletbrush
Suby Shopping & Maintenance/Warranty
1
04-01-2007 11:19 PM
strontium
Drivetrain
0
06-05-2003 10:36 AM