Attn Scubaru
12-15-2008 | 04:58 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 536
From: Taking your MIND!
Car Info: MkIII MR2, s14, 94 mx5, 99 mx5. The beauty of rwd.
Attn Scubaru
Yo vern! I tried checking your gear ratios to tire size calcs...
redline 8400
final drive 4.13
kumho v710's
1st gear 35mph
2nd gear 68mph
3rd gear 99 mph
4th gear 134mph
5th gear 158mph
Nutz...
redline 8400
final drive 4.13
kumho v710's
1st gear 35mph
2nd gear 68mph
3rd gear 99 mph
4th gear 134mph
5th gear 158mph
Nutz...
12-16-2008 | 10:44 AM
#5
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 536
From: Taking your MIND!
Car Info: MkIII MR2, s14, 94 mx5, 99 mx5. The beauty of rwd.
I was thinking, Celica 6 spd, spyder stock 4.312 rear end, hoosier 255/40 r13's and hoosier 255/40 r13's would work pretty well.
Redline would be at about 38mph in 1st, and when redline shifting into 2nd, you'd be just about at the 5500 rpm VTAK, cross over point. If you wanted something non-streetable, then I'd go with the same setup, but with the same setup, but with the c-one 4.8 rear end... 1st would fly by at 34mph, and 2nd would top out at 53mph, which is about as fast as most courses are going to get.... I'd prefer this setup, as 2nd is easier to modulate, but on the street it would suck.
Correction, with this setup, it may still be about stock... I forgot it'd be a 6spd rather than a 5 spd, and that on street tires, the rolling diameter would increase by about an inch.... 60mph would come in at about 3100-3200 which is lower than stock
Redline would be at about 38mph in 1st, and when redline shifting into 2nd, you'd be just about at the 5500 rpm VTAK, cross over point. If you wanted something non-streetable, then I'd go with the same setup, but with the same setup, but with the c-one 4.8 rear end... 1st would fly by at 34mph, and 2nd would top out at 53mph, which is about as fast as most courses are going to get.... I'd prefer this setup, as 2nd is easier to modulate, but on the street it would suck.
Correction, with this setup, it may still be about stock... I forgot it'd be a 6spd rather than a 5 spd, and that on street tires, the rolling diameter would increase by about an inch.... 60mph would come in at about 3100-3200 which is lower than stock
Last edited by Shin RS; 12-16-2008 at 10:47 AM.
12-16-2008 | 11:58 PM
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,051
From: In Dad's garage.
Car Info: MY02 GD WAGON, MY87 AW11
I was thinking, Celica 6 spd, spyder stock 4.312 rear end, hoosier 255/40 r13's and hoosier 255/40 r13's would work pretty well.
Redline would be at about 38mph in 1st, and when redline shifting into 2nd, you'd be just about at the 5500 rpm VTAK, cross over point. If you wanted something non-streetable, then I'd go with the same setup, but with the same setup, but with the c-one 4.8 rear end... 1st would fly by at 34mph, and 2nd would top out at 53mph, which is about as fast as most courses are going to get.... I'd prefer this setup, as 2nd is easier to modulate, but on the street it would suck.
Correction, with this setup, it may still be about stock... I forgot it'd be a 6spd rather than a 5 spd, and that on street tires, the rolling diameter would increase by about an inch.... 60mph would come in at about 3100-3200 which is lower than stock
Redline would be at about 38mph in 1st, and when redline shifting into 2nd, you'd be just about at the 5500 rpm VTAK, cross over point. If you wanted something non-streetable, then I'd go with the same setup, but with the same setup, but with the c-one 4.8 rear end... 1st would fly by at 34mph, and 2nd would top out at 53mph, which is about as fast as most courses are going to get.... I'd prefer this setup, as 2nd is easier to modulate, but on the street it would suck.
Correction, with this setup, it may still be about stock... I forgot it'd be a 6spd rather than a 5 spd, and that on street tires, the rolling diameter would increase by about an inch.... 60mph would come in at about 3100-3200 which is lower than stock
12-17-2008 | 11:44 AM
#8
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 536
From: Taking your MIND!
Car Info: MkIII MR2, s14, 94 mx5, 99 mx5. The beauty of rwd.
^^^
MEGASquirt!!!!!!
Haha, p.north.... j/k
We're talking about some nerdage about gear ratios for auto-x ( and also for daily driving ). We don't exactly have much power to brag about, so mechanical gear advantages or high revving ( in verns case ) helps to even the field. His car revs to 8400 rpm Mine revs to 6750 boo 
Eventually I'm planning on doing a motor swap and raising the rev limit to 8400 too, so this is some planning I'm doing for the future. Normally I don't get this involved, but I'd like to take Curtis down again one day...
MEGASquirt!!!!!!
Haha, p.north.... j/k
We're talking about some nerdage about gear ratios for auto-x ( and also for daily driving ). We don't exactly have much power to brag about, so mechanical gear advantages or high revving ( in verns case ) helps to even the field. His car revs to 8400 rpm
Mine revs to 6750 boo Eventually I'm planning on doing a motor swap and raising the rev limit to 8400 too, so this is some planning I'm doing for the future. Normally I don't get this involved, but I'd like to take Curtis down again one day...
12-17-2008 | 12:23 PM
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,892
From: not in your rear view!!
Car Info: 04 sti now pulling hard but super greasy!!
is he still maintaining good power and torque through the whole band all the way to redline??? if so uhmmmmmm wow!! must be screaming!
12-17-2008 | 01:34 PM
#10
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 536
From: Taking your MIND!
Car Info: MkIII MR2, s14, 94 mx5, 99 mx5. The beauty of rwd.
Well, for our cars, "good" power and torque is a relative term... I think my car makes about as much power at both rear wheels as francis's car does at just one 
12-17-2008 | 02:49 PM
#12
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 536
From: Taking your MIND!
Car Info: MkIII MR2, s14, 94 mx5, 99 mx5. The beauty of rwd.
I don't have some new finangled program to graph hp/torque to rpm/gear selection, but as far as graphs are concerned, I concocted this one yesterday...
The dynos are from SCC.
The dynos are from SCC.