Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM) There is replacement for displacement, it is forced induction - OEM 2.0 liter turbo engines in the USDM WRX. 90-94 Legacy Turbo EJ22 turbo engines can also be discussed here.

Low end power????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2003 | 09:32 PM
  #1  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
Question Low end power????

What's a good way to get more low end (0-60 MPH) power out of a 02-03 WRX??

The car only has a up & down-pipe for mods. I'm asking this for someone else.

Any ideas?
Old 08-21-2003 | 09:46 PM
  #2  
Shin RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 536
From: Taking your MIND!
Car Info: MkIII MR2, s14, 94 mx5, 99 mx5. The beauty of rwd.
With nAwSs Bizzzzatch!
Old 08-21-2003 | 09:53 PM
  #3  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII




Old 08-21-2003 | 10:15 PM
  #4  
BoOm's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,462
From: Honolulu, HI
Car Info: 2008 MB C350S Chip/Exhaust 268whp
Exhaust will make a difference.
I always believed that a small diameter exhaust such as a Scoobysport with a 2.5" diameter piping was better for low end compared to bigger diameter ones.

boost controller will help a bit, especially in the midrange.

3/16th's mod.

IC hoses

UTEC or any aftermarket ecu with tuning esp Ecutek and Cobb reflashes.

And then if you're that daring,
Go for those GT series turbos or any low spooling ballbearing turbos.
Cams and other internals.
Displacement
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:31 PM
  #5  
Nolimit's Avatar
Where is my beer?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,677
From: San Diego
Car Info: NSX, G35
i wouldn't waste my money on the s/s exhaust.
the cheapest and easiest way to gain quicker 0-60 times is a mbc. I think we've beat that dead horse plenty of times.
You will never see 'full' boost in 1st and 2nd gear (0-60mph, right??) without some kind of boost control, ... so if you want a significant gain ....
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:32 PM
  #6  
IS2Scooby's Avatar
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
MBC - no question.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:41 PM
  #7  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
That's what I told the guy!
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:45 PM
  #8  
BoOm's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,462
From: Honolulu, HI
Car Info: 2008 MB C350S Chip/Exhaust 268whp
If the person has a up/dp already on why not get a catback thats aimed for low end? Exhaust and boost controller is one of the best bang for the buck in low end.
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:48 PM
  #9  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
Exhaust is for top-end I thought?
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:52 PM
  #10  
IS2Scooby's Avatar
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
I maintain that if you have the UP/DP combo - the cat back affects your power output very insignificantly.

Going from the Prodrive to UNCORKED wasn't worth much at the track...
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:53 PM
  #11  
BoOm's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,462
From: Honolulu, HI
Car Info: 2008 MB C350S Chip/Exhaust 268whp
I don't quite think so because its all dependent on what you get.

Look at it this way, alot of power, even at low end, is lost through the stock exhaust system's huge restrictive bends and resonators. Thinner diameter, more backpressure.

What I don't get though is for the STI and how many people lose low end torque from it. But I do realize they're using huge *** top end 3.0" diameter systems.
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:54 PM
  #12  
BoOm's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,462
From: Honolulu, HI
Car Info: 2008 MB C350S Chip/Exhaust 268whp
Originally posted by IS2Scooby
I maintain that if you have the UP/DP combo - the cat back affects your power output very insignificantly.

Going from the Prodrive to UNCORKED wasn't worth much at the track...
But you did have the TXS stealth back. It replaces the stock mid pipe. And you also do have a Prodrive axleback, which is less restrictive compared to the stocker.
Old 08-21-2003 | 10:59 PM
  #13  
Mach5WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
Yeah but was that top or low end power? I think it would be top end right?

This is just a really nice older guy that doesn't want too much attention, he reads this board everyday, but wants to stay lowkey. He has no-plans to ever race his car, he just wants a little more power from stoplight to stoplight.
Old 08-21-2003 | 11:03 PM
  #14  
BoOm's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,462
From: Honolulu, HI
Car Info: 2008 MB C350S Chip/Exhaust 268whp
Well I don't really get your question also Dan.

Low end is 0-3000rpm while you ask 0-60ft. While I'm standing by that a good exhaust system aimed for low end will make more power from 0-3000rpm, the results would be ungodly at 0-60ft.

Theres alot of ppl with exhaust systems that got faster in the 0-60ft time compared to the stocker.
Old 08-21-2003 | 11:04 PM
  #15  
IS2Scooby's Avatar
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
I think he was talkin' bout 0-60MPH and not feet...
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote


Quick Reply: Low end power????



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 AM.