View Poll Results: Yay or nay?
yay!
55
74.32%
nay!
19
25.68%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll
Gemballa Porsche Cayenne Turbo - yay or nay ?
07-20-2004 | 12:22 PM
#31
I hate Cayannes so much it hurts... this one is so riced out, it makes me physically ill. Still... I like it better than a regular Cayanne...
I wouldn't kick it out of bed. I'd hit that ish.
I wouldn't kick it out of bed. I'd hit that ish.
07-20-2004 | 12:29 PM
#32
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 211
From: New York
Car Info: 2003 WRX (Black)
Originally Posted by dcfc03
yah!
but I'll be in line for a 911 turbo way way way before I spend my money on that.
of course if I had that money I would'nt care.
but I'll be in line for a 911 turbo way way way before I spend my money on that.
of course if I had that money I would'nt care.
You should see the programs that they have for the turbo... and the GT2.
Awesome...... simply breathless.
http://www.gemballa.com
-K
07-20-2004 | 02:45 PM
#33
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,783
From: rightBehindYou, HI
Car Info: 1973 Huevo Ranchero
Originally Posted by ldivinag
i remember that SOA had some tv ads where they called the forester an "suv"...i just want what 3rd world countries have been getting. a no-nonsense vehicle that i wont cringe everytime i take it OFF ROAD...
[rant OFF]
[rant OFF]
i think there are enough suv's that really aren't.
i used to sell jeeps- gotta say, there is no other vehicle quite like a wrangler-
aloha from the summit of Mauna Kea
07-20-2004 | 03:17 PM
#34
that front end looks menacing and sexy at the same time! however, if i were to spend that much money on a "sports car," i'd rather get a real sports car instead of an AWD station wagon.
can this version go offroading? if not, it seems displaced to me. it's like fixing up a ferrari to go off roading. it can do it, but if i was to spend that much $, i'd get a machine designed with that in mind.
can this version go offroading? if not, it seems displaced to me. it's like fixing up a ferrari to go off roading. it can do it, but if i was to spend that much $, i'd get a machine designed with that in mind.
Last edited by doughboy; 07-20-2004 at 03:19 PM.
07-20-2004 | 10:03 PM
#35
VIP Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,023
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car Info: Subaru Impreza WRX 2002
Very much NAY. Why? Because the whole point behind the SUV in the first place is to allow it at some time in its life to act as a Sport Utility, and that requires something that this riced-out Porsche doesn't have....
...AXLE CLEARANCE.
Lowering trucks or SUVs is about as pointless rice as you can get.
...AXLE CLEARANCE.
Lowering trucks or SUVs is about as pointless rice as you can get.
Last edited by meilers; 07-20-2004 at 10:05 PM.
08-08-2004 | 11:17 PM
#38
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 688
From: My Happy Place
Can't stand them. Porsche should stick to making cars its what they're good at. So what if everyone else is making SUV's that doesn't mean you have to. If everyone else went and jumped off a bridge does that mean you're going to do it too.
!
08-13-2004 | 02:52 PM
#44
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
that's one of the most amazing things I have seen in some time. Might be old news but I've never seen it. Freakin amazing. I'd be all over it if I was LOADED.
But then again if I was loaded I'd have a lot of options so who knows.
But then again if I was loaded I'd have a lot of options so who knows.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
