Car Lounge General automotive talk not specific to Subaru.

California license plate law

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2005 | 10:37 AM
  #16  
mbquarts's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,180
From: An ALMS race near you
Car Info: 03 MBP WRX
Originally Posted by norcalridin
* Blue and yellow headlights. Headlights must be white - blue and yellow are illegal (24011 VC). Look for the DOT symbol on the bulb and package.
hmm thats weird considering that the older mercedes headlights are straight blue, theres no white in them.. and whut about yellow fog lights... i was thinking about getting some hyper yellow headlight bulbs but i guess not anymore!!
Yellow fog lights are legal. Some cars come with yellow fogs stock...i.e. Lexus IS300.
Old 07-21-2005 | 11:08 AM
  #17  
BlingBlingBlue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
Originally Posted by Wingless Wonder
To my knowledge, DMV currently issues two plates for every model car. Don't know about Porsche, specifically. Could be a case where the owners just don't want like the looks of having a front plate mounted, just like many of us. From the factory, there are no holes drilled in our front bumper cover. I wouldn't use it either, but I just don't have the time to be pulled over on my way to work.
DMV issues single plates to motorcycles. FWIW Carlsen drilled holes in my bumper to attach the front plates.
Old 07-21-2005 | 01:06 PM
  #18  
RussB's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,351
From: pompous douchebag
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
Originally Posted by doughboy
This is INCORRECT.



Front License Plate Bracket

11713.17. (a) Following the retail sale or lease of a motor vehicle for which the department issues two license plates, a dealer may not deliver the motor vehicle unless either of the following occurs:

(1) The motor vehicle is equipped with a bracket or other means of securing a front license plate.

(2) The dealer obtains a signed written acknowledgment from the person taking delivery of the motor vehicle acknowledging both of the following:

(A) The person expressly refused installation of a bracket or other means of securing the front license plate.

(B) The person understands that California law requires a license plate to be displayed from and securely fastened to the front of the motor vehicle and that the hardware necessary to securely fasten the front plate is available from the dealer.

(b) A manufacturer or distributor may not sell or distribute in this state a new motor vehicle for which the department issues two license plates, unless that motor vehicle is equipped or provided with a bracket or other means of securing the license plates.
Added Sec. 1, Ch. 365, Stats. 2004. Effective January 1, 2005.

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d05/vc11713_17.htm

this is how it is. i didn't want to drill holes in the front of my g35, looks like *** with a plate up there, so the dealer gave me the bracket, all hardware, instructions, and the above mentioned form.

after getting a fix it ticket, i installed the front plate.
Old 07-21-2005 | 03:15 PM
  #19  
newyorkreload's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,781
From: 500mi North of Montana. Enjoying free health care.
Car Info: Bugeyed Autowagon
you could always keep your front plate under the seat. hand it to the cop when they ask about it. see what happens.
Old 07-22-2005 | 02:44 AM
  #20  
1fastGC's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,804
From: Oakland/El Cerrito, CA
Car Info: Evolution VIII
Originally Posted by newyorkreload
you could always keep your front plate under the seat. hand it to the cop when they ask about it. see what happens.
yup, thats what i did..

"hey officer, i was just about to put these on when i get home!" lol
Old 07-22-2005 | 03:12 PM
  #21  
TygerStile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
From: SoCal
Car Info: 02 Subaru WRX
Not having the front plate on is an invitation to be pulled over. That's why I have mine on in the front, even if its not in the stock plate location. Mine covers the right foglight area...
Old 07-23-2005 | 01:01 AM
  #22  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
I guess I'll just keep the plate on, even though I dont like how it looks. As far as the no mounting bracket thing on certain cars, I think almost all cars have a spot, it might just be covered. Take a look at corvettes, they have that little thing in the front where it says "corvette" I've seen one with that removed and a plate put on...it ruins the look of vettes though
Old 07-24-2005 | 01:10 AM
  #23  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Originally Posted by TygerStile
Not having the front plate on is an invitation to be pulled over. That's why I have mine on in the front, even if its not in the stock plate location. Mine covers the right foglight area...
Indeed. If you have mods that would get you sent to the Smog Ref, I would find a way to deal with running a front plate. Dumb reason to get pulled over and sent through that hassle...
Old 07-24-2005 | 09:21 PM
  #24  
DomozitoLK's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,019
From: Northern California
Car Info: 2018 Forester XT Touring (Dark Gray Metallic)
Originally Posted by norcalridin
* Blue and yellow headlights. Headlights must be white - blue and yellow are illegal (24011 VC). Look for the DOT symbol on the bulb and package.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc24011.htm

Doesn't say anything about headlight color in that vehicle code. Where did you get this info? EDIT: Noticed you got it from the Street Legal CHP site. I'm not sure how they can say that as that vehicle code has nothing to do with lighting. Yellow headlights are legal under California Vehicle Code #25950

Originally Posted by CA DMV

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc25950.htm

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/wa...ction=retrieve


25950. This section applies to the color of lamps and to any
reflector exhibiting or reflecting perceptible light of 0.05 candela
or more per foot-candle of incident illumination. Unless provided
otherwise, the color of lamps and reflectors upon a vehicle shall be
as follows:
(a) The emitted light from all lamps and the reflected light from
all reflectors, visible from in front of a vehicle, shall be white or
yellow, except as follows:
(1) Rear side marker lamps required by Section 25100 may show red
to the front.
(2) The color of foglamps described in Section 24403 may be in the
color spectrum from white to yellow.
(b) The emitted light from all lamps and the reflected light from
all reflectors, visible from the rear of a vehicle, shall be red
except as follows:
(1) Stoplamps on vehicles manufactured before January 1, 1979, may
show yellow to the rear.
(2) Turn signal lamps may show yellow to the rear.
(3) Front side marker lamps required by Section 25100 may show
yellow to the rear.
(4) Backup lamps shall show white to the rear.
(5) The rearward facing portion of any front-mounted double-faced
turn signal lamp may show amber to the rear while the headlamps or
parking lamps are lighted, if the intensity of the light emitted is
not greater than the parking lamps and the turn signal function is
not impaired.
(6) Reflectors meeting the requirements of and installed in
accordance with Section 24611 shall be red or white, or both.
(c) All lamps and reflectors visible from the front, sides, or
rear of a vehicle, except headlamps, may have any unlighted color,
provided the emitted light from all lamps or reflected light from all
reflectors complies with the required color. Except for backup
lamps, the entire effective projected luminous area of lamps visible
from the rear or mounted on the sides near the rear of a vehicle
shall be covered by an inner lens of the required color when the
unlighted color differs from the required emitted light color.
Taillamps, stoplamps, and turn signal lamps that are visible to the
rear may be white when unlighted on vehicles manufactured before
January 1, 1974.

Last edited by DomozitoLK; 07-24-2005 at 09:27 PM.
Old 07-31-2005 | 08:39 PM
  #25  
4thHorse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8
One funny thing about fog lights is that, it is illegal to use them if there is no fog. Also to answer the topic yes you have to have a front plate on the front of the car. They use it for the red light photos at intersections. If you run a red they take a picture of the front and the rear.
Old 07-31-2005 | 09:50 PM
  #26  
Kevin M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
It's perfectly legal to run fog lights at any time. CA law stipulates a maximum of 4 forward facing driving lights. If you have more than that mounted on your vehicle, all but 4 must be covered.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
w0ng3r
Bay Area
23
01-12-2014 04:15 PM
jankenpon
Used Aftermarket Car Parts For Sale
1
10-05-2008 06:24 PM
jankenpon
SoCal Classifieds
1
10-05-2008 06:22 PM
Cend-Wrex
Bay Area
6
12-27-2006 10:08 PM
Kuonji
Bay Area
7
03-01-2004 08:59 PM



Quick Reply: California license plate law



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:25 AM.