Yakima or Thule?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: 650
Posts: 1,824
Car Info: '14 Odyssey & '13 Prius
Yakima or Thule?
This is probably like asking Coke or Pepsi. But i'm a noob when it comes to racks (YES!). I've done a bit of research but not completely sold on either brand.
Any pros/cons to either brand? I'm looking for Snowboard/ski rack for my 05 wagon, possibly the Yakima freshsesh. I'm about to get the OEM crossbars soon. Does anyone know if the yakima/thule fairings attach easily to these bars?
Any pros/cons to either brand? I'm looking for Snowboard/ski rack for my 05 wagon, possibly the Yakima freshsesh. I'm about to get the OEM crossbars soon. Does anyone know if the yakima/thule fairings attach easily to these bars?
#2
No problems with either of my Yakima racks. I had one for my old wagon and one for my STi - both worked great. Never used Thule. Check the classifieds, I may have seen one recently.
#6
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area/SB
Posts: 1,161
Car Info: 02 WRX
Yakima makes more of their units in the US than thule, also, round bars are easier to work with in many cases.
One major advantage of the round bars is the ability to rotate the ski attachments 90° to increase aerodynamics and decrease whistling. A lot of people will leave the ski attachment on all winter and it's SO nice to be able to cut down on the wind noise during the week.
Having made countless calls to both companies' customer service lines to hunt down misc. parts, I can confidently say that Yakima's support is easier to work with. Both companies were nearly even in terms of success rate.
I also feel that the yakima styling is more up to date and sleek, but that's just my opinion.
One major advantage of the round bars is the ability to rotate the ski attachments 90° to increase aerodynamics and decrease whistling. A lot of people will leave the ski attachment on all winter and it's SO nice to be able to cut down on the wind noise during the week.
Having made countless calls to both companies' customer service lines to hunt down misc. parts, I can confidently say that Yakima's support is easier to work with. Both companies were nearly even in terms of success rate.
I also feel that the yakima styling is more up to date and sleek, but that's just my opinion.
#7
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area/SB
Posts: 1,161
Car Info: 02 WRX
Side note: If you don't already have crossbars, I would suggest going with aftermarket ones. Any time you want to add an attachment you're going to have to worry about adaptors if you go with factory, plus you can't use the rack-rotation technique on bladed aero bars.
Last edited by akdmx; 01-26-2010 at 11:03 AM. Reason: typo
#11
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
To say that round bars are stronger than square, I gotta call you on that. It's going to depend on the application. Round tubing would perform better under a tortional load. A flagpole... A square tube simply by design is designed to support more load across it's length when suspended between points. Take a frame rail for instance. The biggest factor is the tubing thickness. Square is generally thicker and heavier.
#12
Warm Fuzzy Admin
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 13,799
Car Info: 97 LOB, 05 FXT, 03 Tundra
I've always been a Yakima guy. Go with real crossbars, not OEM ones. Not only are they more functional, they're designed to go on and off repeatedly. I can't count how many stripped fasteners I've seen on the OEM crossbars after repeated use..
#14
yakima is the way to go for me.. maybe thats just because i got a very good deal on the complete set.. and also it sounds cooler saying you have yakima instead of a thule ;p.. wouldnt mind trying the thule set up though just to compare