View Poll Results: Who are you all voting for?
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll
who are you all voting for?
06-28-2004, 09:19 AM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 171
Car Info: 2004 Subaru WRX (Silver Sedan)
Originally Posted by mcdrama
no way in hell am I voting for Bush. I would vote for Kucinich if he was still in. =\
Oh well, if Kerry gets in he will probably be assasinated, if Bush wins then we get another 4 year term of war, greed, and pointless killing. Did I mention Bush is an oil greedy bastard? =x
LET THE FLAMES BEGIN!
Oh well, if Kerry gets in he will probably be assasinated, if Bush wins then we get another 4 year term of war, greed, and pointless killing. Did I mention Bush is an oil greedy bastard? =x
LET THE FLAMES BEGIN!
Oh, and anyone who says that killing Saddam and his regime needs to do a little history research on his reign. It is not clear whether or not Saddam was involved at all in international terrorist interests, but he was certainly the connoisseur of domestic terrorism with his own people.
06-28-2004, 09:23 AM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 171
Car Info: 2004 Subaru WRX (Silver Sedan)
Originally Posted by Roo
It's just too bad the 20 year curse didn't strike this time...
'63 Kennedy
'81 Reagan
'0x Bush Jr. ??
Mind you, Bush Jr. is just following the path of Bush Sr...
Pays no attention to the international community, start a war, and don't give a s#$t about the domestic policy. His stupidity and incompetence are only matched by his greed and lies. Of course, Cheney isn't much better...I'm sure he's still in bed with Halliburton, a company that is as crooked as the roads I like to drive...
Let's get Hillary in for another 8 year term (since we KNOW she was already in power for 8 years ...lol...lol) and maybe Barbara Boxer as Veep...
'63 Kennedy
'81 Reagan
'0x Bush Jr. ??
Mind you, Bush Jr. is just following the path of Bush Sr...
Pays no attention to the international community, start a war, and don't give a s#$t about the domestic policy. His stupidity and incompetence are only matched by his greed and lies. Of course, Cheney isn't much better...I'm sure he's still in bed with Halliburton, a company that is as crooked as the roads I like to drive...
Let's get Hillary in for another 8 year term (since we KNOW she was already in power for 8 years ...lol...lol) and maybe Barbara Boxer as Veep...
06-28-2004, 09:43 AM
#20
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Least Coast :(
Posts: 8,159
Car Info: 08 sti
Originally Posted by barrelroll_9
Oil Greedy bastard? Perhaps you didn't notice, but our country didn't take any benefit from the plethora of oil that sits in Iraq even though we could have benefited tremendously from it.
Oh, and anyone who says that killing Saddam and his regime needs to do a little history research on his reign. It is not clear whether or not Saddam was involved at all in international terrorist interests, but he was certainly the connoisseur of domestic terrorism with his own people.
Oh, and anyone who says that killing Saddam and his regime needs to do a little history research on his reign. It is not clear whether or not Saddam was involved at all in international terrorist interests, but he was certainly the connoisseur of domestic terrorism with his own people.
how can we benie from the oil when we blew the **** out of the infrastructure to suppor the production and distribution of that oil? Not to mention that COMPLETE LACK OF OIL PRODUCING EQUIPMENT TO BE ABLE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
just think they ahd a freaking oil sanctions for how long? 10-12 years? you expect to waltz into baghdad and see top nothc facilities that look like saudi?
man your dumb...
06-28-2004, 09:51 AM
#22
Originally Posted by Stock Y-gon
I think this time around, the question is not who you are voting FOR, but who you are voting AGAINST.
i will choose to vote against bush
06-28-2004, 11:14 AM
#23
250,000-mile Club President
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bizerkeley
Posts: 4,770
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by barrelroll_9
Oil Greedy bastard? Perhaps you didn't notice, but our country didn't take any benefit from the plethora of oil that sits in Iraq even though we could have benefited tremendously from it.....
06-28-2004, 11:59 AM
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 171
Car Info: 2004 Subaru WRX (Silver Sedan)
Originally Posted by dr3d1zzl3
how can we benie from the oil when we blew the **** out of the infrastructure to suppor the production and distribution of that oil? Not to mention that COMPLETE LACK OF OIL PRODUCING EQUIPMENT TO BE ABLE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
just think they ahd a freaking oil sanctions for how long? 10-12 years? you expect to waltz into baghdad and see top nothc facilities that look like saudi?
man your dumb...
just think they ahd a freaking oil sanctions for how long? 10-12 years? you expect to waltz into baghdad and see top nothc facilities that look like saudi?
man your dumb...
Ohhhh....you're from Davis. Now I understand.
06-28-2004, 12:04 PM
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Posts: 171
Car Info: 2004 Subaru WRX (Silver Sedan)
Originally Posted by psoper
No our country isn't profiting, in fact we're paying dearly for all of his administrations malfeasance, it's Bechtel, Halliburton and all of his buddies that are making BILLIONS off their looting of our treasury.
I know a lot of the contractors and soldiers that are there right now, putting their lives on the line for the free world. The military members and contractors truly believe in what they're working for, the cause for freedom.
06-28-2004, 01:26 PM
#28
250,000-mile Club President
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bizerkeley
Posts: 4,770
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by mexicanpizza
The fact that they survive at all after losing their Asbestos lawsuit defies economic sense, if it weren't for the no-bid contracts they got handed by the VP, they would be in far worse shape.
And yeah, there are thousands of US companies over there, there used to be a term for it- "war profiteering", and it was punishable by imprisonment.
But I guess all the "old" rules of civilization are now "antiquated", right? I mean if "they" don't "respect humanity" there no reason we should
Just think if people had started thinking this way back in the dark ages, by now we might.... wait a second, -they did think like that in the dark ages.
"America love it or leave it" is starting to seem to me like a hard decision, because I think that blind nationalism is about the only thing more dangerous to humanity than blind religious fanaticism.
