What's the difference between 1 and 2 piece UPs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2005, 12:19 AM
  #31  
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Long_Travel_WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: FLATLINE__________FAB
Posts: 983
Car Info: stock 04 wrx sedan
ive had my helix flex crack in half but might be becuse i modified by adding the external wastegate dont know if it had something to do with it, im too lazy to cut the flex open to take picts, ive also seen first hand a solid up pipe crack from stress, also seen aftermarket headers crack from stress related incedents i weld this shiitt most afternoons so ive seen it, go with a flex always gonna last longer dont care what you say
Long_Travel_WRX is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 12:28 AM
  #32  
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Long_Travel_WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: FLATLINE__________FAB
Posts: 983
Car Info: stock 04 wrx sedan
Originally Posted by EJ20Legacy
Crucial does NOT powdercoat its uppipes. They are ceramic coated. Check out their website to see how extensive of a process it is. OF COURSE it's coated on the inside and outside. Coating only the outside is a good way to cause metal fatigue. It also does nothing to protect the metal itself from exhaust heat or the corrosive elements in exhaust gasses.



Everybody who argues OEM is the best and flex sections are the best because the OEM one has one is crazier than a boiled owl. How many OEM parts have you swapped on your car for aftermarket parts? How much of an improvment did you see? Subaru put a catalytic converter in the uppipe pre-turbo. You guys think that was a great idea because it's OEM??? I don't see aftermarket ones with a cat. The flex section allows for looser tolerances and lower manufacturing and assembly costs because of it, and nothing else. It causes turbulence. Stock STI's see 5++ whp gains by simply switching to an aftermarket uppipe. The stock accordian section causes a huge amount of turbulence... that and the casting is very, very rough.


I wouldn't let you down!!!......

Josh (don't know his user name on here) had a Helix that failed on him. Braided sections will fail over time.

Here are a couple pictures of your precious JDM uppipe without the heat shielding. Not exactly sexy. Look at the pipe right before the turbo flange.... yikes. This one, btw, cracked where the yellow box is drawn:





Ted (GotBoost?) has a twin scroll JDM one, so he doesn't count, lol.



PDE recommends the flex one for ease on install if you have factory headers. If you have aftermarket headers, they recommend the solid one. Why? Because, according to them, aftermarket headers move around more and expand/contract more. A flex section IS NOT meant to see repeated movement and it will fail. They recommend the solid one because it is stronger and will stand up to that.

I have headers on my car that come w/ an uppipe. I don't even apply to any of this stuff. I'm not pimping solid because it's on my car.

If the company takes the time to make it PERFECT, like Crucial does, a solid uppipe is better. Better for longevity, performance, whatever...

Jeremy
just for the record the helix flex is not A BRAIDED FLEX JOINT AS YOU STATED
is simply an acordian flex with a mesh cover if you take the time to look at it,
and for them to say running a flex with a aftermarket header is no good is the bigest load of crap yet, for the record just last week a car with a nice high dollar header running a solid aftermarket up pipe had two nice clean crack around both flanges, one thing that is correct a header expands and contracts alot putting stress on the solid up pipe because the up pipe brackets are solid mounted under the turbo that action will cause one or the other to fail so dont know wtf there talking about, if the turbo is on a custom up pipe most of the time it will last, given that there is no up pipe bracket similar to the stock one with that said dont go selling your solid up pipe peoples im just speaking my experienced opinion

your friendly local self proclamied fabricator, james

Last edited by Long_Travel_WRX; 05-17-2005 at 12:39 AM.
Long_Travel_WRX is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 01:29 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
EJ20Legacy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, Cali
Posts: 411
Car Info: '98 Legacy GT - EJ20 swap, STI RA tranny, VF22+
So I guess if they both fail, you might as well go solid for the lack of turbulence and Crucial for the lifetime warranty,

Just for the record, 321 stainless expands and contracts even less than cast iron. The ceramic coating lessens that further by shielding the metal from a certain amount of additional heat.

I'm honestly not super partial either way (flex vs. solid). They both have their merits. It's just the "OEM does it so aftermarket should, too" argument that makes no sense coming from people like us.
EJ20Legacy is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 06:57 AM
  #34  
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
ipozestu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Originally Posted by UK n00b
Why?

Also regarding the testing of flow and such to what data do you have that companies such as Cobb/APS have conducted such tests?

I don't care overally as I run none of the aforementioned parts on my car just curious of the reasoning behind peoples posts especially when Helix uppipes have probably 3x that of their nearest compititor out there on cars.
In response to this. My background is mechanical engineering. When I look at a part I look at it from many different angles. I look at the functionality, will it perform, what are the potential drawbacks/advantages of a design. How is the quality of the build? Do they use consistent and quality materials, as to not cut cost corners. What is the longevity of the piece. Lastly how does it look.

When is look at the APS uppipe I see a piece that has many advantages over other pipes. First being it's engineered, there's a lot to be said for engineering. Second, the overall strength and integrity of the piece. The cast turbo inlet section is bullet proof(literally) there is no chance of developing a leak/breakage from poor welds or inconsistent materials. In therory a properly tapered inlet to the turbo should provide a smoother flow. In addition the insulating qualities of the thicker cast iron should provide more consistent exhaust gas heat. I see the flex secion as a advantge and a disadvantage. The disadvantage being, there is potential to develop leaks, naturally the are more breaks in the pipe. This can be prevented by proper intallation. Chances are likely that it will leak eventually but you have to do your best. The advantage I see in the flex section is in the case of an upipe failure due to an expansion joint breaking or leaking all you have to replace is the expansion joint. not the whole pipe. Another advantage to the flex section is it's placement. It is in perfect position to absorb vibration variances off of the exhaust manifold and allow for the expansion of both the upipe and exhaust manifold. Lastly cost. The APS is more expensive but I see an advantage. This is why you see so many more helix pipes out there. How many times have you been asked the advantage/disadvantage of a part as opposed to how much will it cost. Overall cost is generally the determining factor in most peoples decision to buy an item. Setteling with it's good enough. This a process I go through with every part. I actually find it rewarding to do the research and apply the knowledge I have to purchasing. I feel much better about my purchase when it arrives at my door.
Comments?
Jeff
ipozestu is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:24 AM
  #35  
more than meets the eye
iTrader: (14)
 
soundwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 6,054
Car Info: ?
Originally Posted by ipozestu
The APS is more expensive but I see an advantage.
Is that to justify that you spent more $$ for a product that won't work x% better?

Testing of flow and data ? You didn't answer that.
soundwave is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 10:19 AM
  #36  
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
UK n00b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Posts: 2,539
Car Info: the blue bucket
Originally Posted by ipozestu
In response to this. My background is mechanical engineering. When I look at a part I look at it from many different angles. I look at the functionality, will it perform, what are the potential drawbacks/advantages of a design. How is the quality of the build? Do they use consistent and quality materials, as to not cut cost corners. What is the longevity of the piece. Lastly how does it look.

When is look at the APS uppipe I see a piece that has many advantages over other pipes. First being it's engineered, there's a lot to be said for engineering. Second, the overall strength and integrity of the piece. The cast turbo inlet section is bullet proof(literally) there is no chance of developing a leak/breakage from poor welds or inconsistent materials. In therory a properly tapered inlet to the turbo should provide a smoother flow. In addition the insulating qualities of the thicker cast iron should provide more consistent exhaust gas heat. I see the flex secion as a advantge and a disadvantage. The disadvantage being, there is potential to develop leaks, naturally the are more breaks in the pipe. This can be prevented by proper intallation. Chances are likely that it will leak eventually but you have to do your best. The advantage I see in the flex section is in the case of an upipe failure due to an expansion joint breaking or leaking all you have to replace is the expansion joint. not the whole pipe. Another advantage to the flex section is it's placement. It is in perfect position to absorb vibration variances off of the exhaust manifold and allow for the expansion of both the upipe and exhaust manifold. Lastly cost. The APS is more expensive but I see an advantage. This is why you see so many more helix pipes out there. How many times have you been asked the advantage/disadvantage of a part as opposed to how much will it cost. Overall cost is generally the determining factor in most peoples decision to buy an item. Setteling with it's good enough. This a process I go through with every part. I actually find it rewarding to do the research and apply the knowledge I have to purchasing. I feel much better about my purchase when it arrives at my door.
Comments?
Jeff
I see the merits of what your saying based on cost as 99% of people's decision making is based on cost, unfortunatley from a engineering standpoint there are also good and bad things from the cast peice. Cast being stronger is good, casting unless ported typically is less than smooth (look in any cast turbo turbine)

Based on performance you might as well save the cash as the APS unit will not out perform the Helix (I have tested both).

Mike
UK n00b is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 10:20 AM
  #37  
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
UK n00b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Posts: 2,539
Car Info: the blue bucket
Originally Posted by EJ20Legacy
So I guess if they both fail, you might as well go solid for the lack of turbulence and Crucial for the lifetime warranty,

Just for the record, 321 stainless expands and contracts even less than cast iron. The ceramic coating lessens that further by shielding the metal from a certain amount of additional heat.

I'm honestly not super partial either way (flex vs. solid). They both have their merits. It's just the "OEM does it so aftermarket should, too" argument that makes no sense coming from people like us.

Does the warranty cover the turbo failure when the ceramic coating breaks up?

Mike <-- seen what ceramic coating chunks can do!
UK n00b is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 10:24 AM
  #38  
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
UK n00b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Posts: 2,539
Car Info: the blue bucket
Originally Posted by EJ20Legacy
Stock STI's see 5++ whp gains by simply switching to an aftermarket uppipe. The stock accordian section causes a huge amount of turbulence... that and the casting is very, very rough.

Jeremy
Stock uppipes are by no means perfect but I would love to see proper before and after proof with ECU resets to negate long term corrections to back up the above statement.

Mike
UK n00b is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 12:08 PM
  #39  
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
GotBoost?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SBAIC-South BayArea Impreza Club-Campbell, CA-Thur
Posts: 3,648
Car Info: 2003 PSM STi
Originally Posted by EJ20Legacy
Ted (GotBoost?) has a twin scroll JDM one, so he doesn't count, lol.
yep, but its not installed yet.....the one I currently have on my car IS a JDM uppipe also.....But yea, the TwinScroll will be installed soon enough...as I just ordered my DP today. w00t!


Originally Posted by porkchop
actually they're just JDM... no diff between STI and WRX...

this was a selling tactic a company was using to push those parts by labeling them as "STI" parts.
OK, so I got suckered into this one <shrug>, no j/k..LOL not really.....all I really cared about at the time of purchase was that it was catless, and cheap.....I originally wanted a Helix, but they were out of stock when I went to buy it...so MPJ hooked me up with a killer deal on a JDM one.

-Ted
GotBoost? is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 12:48 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
EJ20Legacy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, Cali
Posts: 411
Car Info: '98 Legacy GT - EJ20 swap, STI RA tranny, VF22+
Originally Posted by UK n00b
Stock uppipes are by no means perfect but I would love to see proper before and after proof with ECU resets to negate long term corrections to back up the above statement.

Mike
Yeah, I would also. Unfortunately 5 hp is also pretty much meaningless as a Subaru will vary that much run-to-run without changing a thing, as you know. People have claimed gains from switching out the OEM piece all over NASIOC for a long time now. I don't have personal experience in this area so I'll just write that off to hearsay. Looking at the OEM piece though, it's not much of a stretch to think it's credible.

At any rate, if it's true or believed to be true it'll definitely help you/Gruppe-S as the Helix is one of the most popular aftermarket choices ... so don't bash the idea too hard, haha.

Does the warranty cover the turbo failure when the ceramic coating breaks up?
Russ really, really stands behind his product. If the coating did break up and cause a turbo failure, I actually think he would help the owner with the purchase of a new turbo. Really.

If you're interested, they have a description of their ceramic coating process and the coating used HERE.



Moike -- I'm not trying to step on your lovely and talented toes here . The Helix is a good pipe for the price.

Jeremy
EJ20Legacy is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 01:14 PM
  #41  
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
UK n00b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Posts: 2,539
Car Info: the blue bucket
I typically try and stop STI owners from changing the uppipe as I hate to see people waste money (never been much of a salesman).

I have no doubt Crucial would stand behind that as from my dealings with them they have been stand up I just think internally coating something is crazy, just my opinion though.

No toes stepped on mate, I just found this a interesting debate with plenty missinformation so thought it would be interesting to stir up to see what people thought as opposed to had proven data for.

Now for another uppipe to throw out there, the Perrin unit is also 321 stainless and none flex anyone have any thoughts on this unit?

Mike
UK n00b is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 03:31 PM
  #42  
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
ipozestu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Originally Posted by soundwave
Is that to justify that you spent more $$ for a product that won't work x% better?

Testing of flow and data ? You didn't answer that.
I didn't spend any money on an APS uppipe. I Don't own one. I'm was speaking of the method to justify my post. I see more pros than cons. Therefore I see an advantage. I would love to do a bench test to compare CFM and Turbulence through each of the Upipes available. I would imagine that the results would be very similar, probably not measurable. So the comparison goes back to cconstruction and material quality, longevity of the piece and potential down time replacing inferior parts. This is where I see the advantage.
As for the smoothness of cast iron, a hone down the center would take care of that real quick.
ipozestu is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 03:40 PM
  #43  
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
GotBoost?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SBAIC-South BayArea Impreza Club-Campbell, CA-Thur
Posts: 3,648
Car Info: 2003 PSM STi
its puuuurty.....


that is all



-Ted
GotBoost? is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 03:50 PM
  #44  
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
ipozestu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
I haven't looked at the perrin specifically. I have seen some exhaust systems by perrin. They don't seem to use stainless tig. Take a look at onemanarmy's exhaust. All of the welds are rusted on a "stainless" exhaust. If the same holds true for the upipe, I'd say inferior product.
ipozestu is offline  
Old 05-17-2005, 03:57 PM
  #45  
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
ipozestu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Originally Posted by UK n00b

I have no doubt Crucial would stand behind that as from my dealings with them they have been stand up I just think internally coating something is crazy, just my opinion though.

Mike
I have to agree with this. Coatings on the inside seems like a bad idea.
ipozestu is offline  


Quick Reply: What's the difference between 1 and 2 piece UPs?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:56 AM.