What's the difference between 1 and 2 piece UPs?
#31
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: FLATLINE__________FAB
Posts: 983
Car Info: stock 04 wrx sedan
ive had my helix flex crack in half but might be becuse i modified by adding the external wastegate dont know if it had something to do with it, im too lazy to cut the flex open to take picts, ive also seen first hand a solid up pipe crack from stress, also seen aftermarket headers crack from stress related incedents i weld this shiitt most afternoons so ive seen it, go with a flex always gonna last longer dont care what you say
#32
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: FLATLINE__________FAB
Posts: 983
Car Info: stock 04 wrx sedan
Originally Posted by EJ20Legacy
Crucial does NOT powdercoat its uppipes. They are ceramic coated. Check out their website to see how extensive of a process it is. OF COURSE it's coated on the inside and outside. Coating only the outside is a good way to cause metal fatigue. It also does nothing to protect the metal itself from exhaust heat or the corrosive elements in exhaust gasses.
Everybody who argues OEM is the best and flex sections are the best because the OEM one has one is crazier than a boiled owl. How many OEM parts have you swapped on your car for aftermarket parts? How much of an improvment did you see? Subaru put a catalytic converter in the uppipe pre-turbo. You guys think that was a great idea because it's OEM??? I don't see aftermarket ones with a cat. The flex section allows for looser tolerances and lower manufacturing and assembly costs because of it, and nothing else. It causes turbulence. Stock STI's see 5++ whp gains by simply switching to an aftermarket uppipe. The stock accordian section causes a huge amount of turbulence... that and the casting is very, very rough.
I wouldn't let you down!!!......
Josh (don't know his user name on here) had a Helix that failed on him. Braided sections will fail over time.
Here are a couple pictures of your precious JDM uppipe without the heat shielding. Not exactly sexy. Look at the pipe right before the turbo flange.... yikes. This one, btw, cracked where the yellow box is drawn:
Ted (GotBoost?) has a twin scroll JDM one, so he doesn't count, lol.
PDE recommends the flex one for ease on install if you have factory headers. If you have aftermarket headers, they recommend the solid one. Why? Because, according to them, aftermarket headers move around more and expand/contract more. A flex section IS NOT meant to see repeated movement and it will fail. They recommend the solid one because it is stronger and will stand up to that.
I have headers on my car that come w/ an uppipe. I don't even apply to any of this stuff. I'm not pimping solid because it's on my car.
If the company takes the time to make it PERFECT, like Crucial does, a solid uppipe is better. Better for longevity, performance, whatever...
Jeremy
Everybody who argues OEM is the best and flex sections are the best because the OEM one has one is crazier than a boiled owl. How many OEM parts have you swapped on your car for aftermarket parts? How much of an improvment did you see? Subaru put a catalytic converter in the uppipe pre-turbo. You guys think that was a great idea because it's OEM??? I don't see aftermarket ones with a cat. The flex section allows for looser tolerances and lower manufacturing and assembly costs because of it, and nothing else. It causes turbulence. Stock STI's see 5++ whp gains by simply switching to an aftermarket uppipe. The stock accordian section causes a huge amount of turbulence... that and the casting is very, very rough.
I wouldn't let you down!!!......
Josh (don't know his user name on here) had a Helix that failed on him. Braided sections will fail over time.
Here are a couple pictures of your precious JDM uppipe without the heat shielding. Not exactly sexy. Look at the pipe right before the turbo flange.... yikes. This one, btw, cracked where the yellow box is drawn:
Ted (GotBoost?) has a twin scroll JDM one, so he doesn't count, lol.
PDE recommends the flex one for ease on install if you have factory headers. If you have aftermarket headers, they recommend the solid one. Why? Because, according to them, aftermarket headers move around more and expand/contract more. A flex section IS NOT meant to see repeated movement and it will fail. They recommend the solid one because it is stronger and will stand up to that.
I have headers on my car that come w/ an uppipe. I don't even apply to any of this stuff. I'm not pimping solid because it's on my car.
If the company takes the time to make it PERFECT, like Crucial does, a solid uppipe is better. Better for longevity, performance, whatever...
Jeremy
is simply an acordian flex with a mesh cover if you take the time to look at it,
and for them to say running a flex with a aftermarket header is no good is the bigest load of crap yet, for the record just last week a car with a nice high dollar header running a solid aftermarket up pipe had two nice clean crack around both flanges, one thing that is correct a header expands and contracts alot putting stress on the solid up pipe because the up pipe brackets are solid mounted under the turbo that action will cause one or the other to fail so dont know wtf there talking about, if the turbo is on a custom up pipe most of the time it will last, given that there is no up pipe bracket similar to the stock one with that said dont go selling your solid up pipe peoples im just speaking my experienced opinion
your friendly local self proclamied fabricator, james
Last edited by Long_Travel_WRX; 05-17-2005 at 12:39 AM.
#33
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, Cali
Posts: 411
Car Info: '98 Legacy GT - EJ20 swap, STI RA tranny, VF22+
So I guess if they both fail, you might as well go solid for the lack of turbulence and Crucial for the lifetime warranty,
Just for the record, 321 stainless expands and contracts even less than cast iron. The ceramic coating lessens that further by shielding the metal from a certain amount of additional heat.
I'm honestly not super partial either way (flex vs. solid). They both have their merits. It's just the "OEM does it so aftermarket should, too" argument that makes no sense coming from people like us.
Just for the record, 321 stainless expands and contracts even less than cast iron. The ceramic coating lessens that further by shielding the metal from a certain amount of additional heat.
I'm honestly not super partial either way (flex vs. solid). They both have their merits. It's just the "OEM does it so aftermarket should, too" argument that makes no sense coming from people like us.
#34
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Originally Posted by UK n00b
Why?
Also regarding the testing of flow and such to what data do you have that companies such as Cobb/APS have conducted such tests?
I don't care overally as I run none of the aforementioned parts on my car just curious of the reasoning behind peoples posts especially when Helix uppipes have probably 3x that of their nearest compititor out there on cars.
Also regarding the testing of flow and such to what data do you have that companies such as Cobb/APS have conducted such tests?
I don't care overally as I run none of the aforementioned parts on my car just curious of the reasoning behind peoples posts especially when Helix uppipes have probably 3x that of their nearest compititor out there on cars.
When is look at the APS uppipe I see a piece that has many advantages over other pipes. First being it's engineered, there's a lot to be said for engineering. Second, the overall strength and integrity of the piece. The cast turbo inlet section is bullet proof(literally) there is no chance of developing a leak/breakage from poor welds or inconsistent materials. In therory a properly tapered inlet to the turbo should provide a smoother flow. In addition the insulating qualities of the thicker cast iron should provide more consistent exhaust gas heat. I see the flex secion as a advantge and a disadvantage. The disadvantage being, there is potential to develop leaks, naturally the are more breaks in the pipe. This can be prevented by proper intallation. Chances are likely that it will leak eventually but you have to do your best. The advantage I see in the flex section is in the case of an upipe failure due to an expansion joint breaking or leaking all you have to replace is the expansion joint. not the whole pipe. Another advantage to the flex section is it's placement. It is in perfect position to absorb vibration variances off of the exhaust manifold and allow for the expansion of both the upipe and exhaust manifold. Lastly cost. The APS is more expensive but I see an advantage. This is why you see so many more helix pipes out there. How many times have you been asked the advantage/disadvantage of a part as opposed to how much will it cost. Overall cost is generally the determining factor in most peoples decision to buy an item. Setteling with it's good enough. This a process I go through with every part. I actually find it rewarding to do the research and apply the knowledge I have to purchasing. I feel much better about my purchase when it arrives at my door.
Comments?
Jeff
#35
more than meets the eye
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 6,054
Car Info: ?
Originally Posted by ipozestu
The APS is more expensive but I see an advantage.
Testing of flow and data ? You didn't answer that.
#36
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Posts: 2,539
Car Info: the blue bucket
Originally Posted by ipozestu
In response to this. My background is mechanical engineering. When I look at a part I look at it from many different angles. I look at the functionality, will it perform, what are the potential drawbacks/advantages of a design. How is the quality of the build? Do they use consistent and quality materials, as to not cut cost corners. What is the longevity of the piece. Lastly how does it look.
When is look at the APS uppipe I see a piece that has many advantages over other pipes. First being it's engineered, there's a lot to be said for engineering. Second, the overall strength and integrity of the piece. The cast turbo inlet section is bullet proof(literally) there is no chance of developing a leak/breakage from poor welds or inconsistent materials. In therory a properly tapered inlet to the turbo should provide a smoother flow. In addition the insulating qualities of the thicker cast iron should provide more consistent exhaust gas heat. I see the flex secion as a advantge and a disadvantage. The disadvantage being, there is potential to develop leaks, naturally the are more breaks in the pipe. This can be prevented by proper intallation. Chances are likely that it will leak eventually but you have to do your best. The advantage I see in the flex section is in the case of an upipe failure due to an expansion joint breaking or leaking all you have to replace is the expansion joint. not the whole pipe. Another advantage to the flex section is it's placement. It is in perfect position to absorb vibration variances off of the exhaust manifold and allow for the expansion of both the upipe and exhaust manifold. Lastly cost. The APS is more expensive but I see an advantage. This is why you see so many more helix pipes out there. How many times have you been asked the advantage/disadvantage of a part as opposed to how much will it cost. Overall cost is generally the determining factor in most peoples decision to buy an item. Setteling with it's good enough. This a process I go through with every part. I actually find it rewarding to do the research and apply the knowledge I have to purchasing. I feel much better about my purchase when it arrives at my door.
Comments?
Jeff
When is look at the APS uppipe I see a piece that has many advantages over other pipes. First being it's engineered, there's a lot to be said for engineering. Second, the overall strength and integrity of the piece. The cast turbo inlet section is bullet proof(literally) there is no chance of developing a leak/breakage from poor welds or inconsistent materials. In therory a properly tapered inlet to the turbo should provide a smoother flow. In addition the insulating qualities of the thicker cast iron should provide more consistent exhaust gas heat. I see the flex secion as a advantge and a disadvantage. The disadvantage being, there is potential to develop leaks, naturally the are more breaks in the pipe. This can be prevented by proper intallation. Chances are likely that it will leak eventually but you have to do your best. The advantage I see in the flex section is in the case of an upipe failure due to an expansion joint breaking or leaking all you have to replace is the expansion joint. not the whole pipe. Another advantage to the flex section is it's placement. It is in perfect position to absorb vibration variances off of the exhaust manifold and allow for the expansion of both the upipe and exhaust manifold. Lastly cost. The APS is more expensive but I see an advantage. This is why you see so many more helix pipes out there. How many times have you been asked the advantage/disadvantage of a part as opposed to how much will it cost. Overall cost is generally the determining factor in most peoples decision to buy an item. Setteling with it's good enough. This a process I go through with every part. I actually find it rewarding to do the research and apply the knowledge I have to purchasing. I feel much better about my purchase when it arrives at my door.
Comments?
Jeff
Based on performance you might as well save the cash as the APS unit will not out perform the Helix (I have tested both).
Mike
#37
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Posts: 2,539
Car Info: the blue bucket
Originally Posted by EJ20Legacy
So I guess if they both fail, you might as well go solid for the lack of turbulence and Crucial for the lifetime warranty,
Just for the record, 321 stainless expands and contracts even less than cast iron. The ceramic coating lessens that further by shielding the metal from a certain amount of additional heat.
I'm honestly not super partial either way (flex vs. solid). They both have their merits. It's just the "OEM does it so aftermarket should, too" argument that makes no sense coming from people like us.
Just for the record, 321 stainless expands and contracts even less than cast iron. The ceramic coating lessens that further by shielding the metal from a certain amount of additional heat.
I'm honestly not super partial either way (flex vs. solid). They both have their merits. It's just the "OEM does it so aftermarket should, too" argument that makes no sense coming from people like us.
Does the warranty cover the turbo failure when the ceramic coating breaks up?
Mike <-- seen what ceramic coating chunks can do!
#38
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Posts: 2,539
Car Info: the blue bucket
Originally Posted by EJ20Legacy
Stock STI's see 5++ whp gains by simply switching to an aftermarket uppipe. The stock accordian section causes a huge amount of turbulence... that and the casting is very, very rough.
Jeremy
Jeremy
Mike
#39
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SBAIC-South BayArea Impreza Club-Campbell, CA-Thur
Posts: 3,648
Car Info: 2003 PSM STi
Originally Posted by EJ20Legacy
Ted (GotBoost?) has a twin scroll JDM one, so he doesn't count, lol.
Originally Posted by porkchop
actually they're just JDM... no diff between STI and WRX...
this was a selling tactic a company was using to push those parts by labeling them as "STI" parts.
this was a selling tactic a company was using to push those parts by labeling them as "STI" parts.
-Ted
#40
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, Cali
Posts: 411
Car Info: '98 Legacy GT - EJ20 swap, STI RA tranny, VF22+
Originally Posted by UK n00b
Stock uppipes are by no means perfect but I would love to see proper before and after proof with ECU resets to negate long term corrections to back up the above statement.
Mike
Mike
At any rate, if it's true or believed to be true it'll definitely help you/Gruppe-S as the Helix is one of the most popular aftermarket choices ... so don't bash the idea too hard, haha.
Does the warranty cover the turbo failure when the ceramic coating breaks up?
If you're interested, they have a description of their ceramic coating process and the coating used HERE.
Moike -- I'm not trying to step on your lovely and talented toes here . The Helix is a good pipe for the price.
Jeremy
#41
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, Hants
Posts: 2,539
Car Info: the blue bucket
I typically try and stop STI owners from changing the uppipe as I hate to see people waste money (never been much of a salesman).
I have no doubt Crucial would stand behind that as from my dealings with them they have been stand up I just think internally coating something is crazy, just my opinion though.
No toes stepped on mate, I just found this a interesting debate with plenty missinformation so thought it would be interesting to stir up to see what people thought as opposed to had proven data for.
Now for another uppipe to throw out there, the Perrin unit is also 321 stainless and none flex anyone have any thoughts on this unit?
Mike
I have no doubt Crucial would stand behind that as from my dealings with them they have been stand up I just think internally coating something is crazy, just my opinion though.
No toes stepped on mate, I just found this a interesting debate with plenty missinformation so thought it would be interesting to stir up to see what people thought as opposed to had proven data for.
Now for another uppipe to throw out there, the Perrin unit is also 321 stainless and none flex anyone have any thoughts on this unit?
Mike
#42
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Originally Posted by soundwave
Is that to justify that you spent more $$ for a product that won't work x% better?
Testing of flow and data ? You didn't answer that.
Testing of flow and data ? You didn't answer that.
As for the smoothness of cast iron, a hone down the center would take care of that real quick.
#44
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
I haven't looked at the perrin specifically. I have seen some exhaust systems by perrin. They don't seem to use stainless tig. Take a look at onemanarmy's exhaust. All of the welds are rusted on a "stainless" exhaust. If the same holds true for the upipe, I'd say inferior product.
#45
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Subabrew Crew
Posts: 7,570
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Originally Posted by UK n00b
I have no doubt Crucial would stand behind that as from my dealings with them they have been stand up I just think internally coating something is crazy, just my opinion though.
Mike