We're going to Wed. Night Drags at Infineon Tonight
03-24-2010, 10:32 PM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: santa rosa
Posts: 263
Car Info: old awd turbo thangy
The drag strip seems to have significantly less traction under poor track conditions than regular roads. Also, remember that EVOs with similar turbos and power levels are generally making significantly less torque and have significantly more lag. This car has zero lag between gears and hits hard every time. 450-460whp and 430ft-lbs is no joke 
-- Ed
-- Ed
03-24-2010, 10:36 PM
#34
nah its not a power difference, I sure it makes tq way earlier then a evo but your not shifting that low in the rpm's anyways so its negligible... My friends car made 620 and had no traction issues either... However you already answer my question... Seems as if its an alignment issue more then anything.. I would love to see what it would do with some decent tires and alignment(or maybe a test and tune night where they prep the track).
03-24-2010, 10:41 PM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: santa rosa
Posts: 263
Car Info: old awd turbo thangy
03-24-2010, 11:05 PM
#36
nah its not a power difference, I sure it makes tq way earlier then a evo but your not shifting that low in the rpm's anyways so its negligible... My friends car made 620 and had no traction issues either... However you already answer my question... Seems as if its an alignment issue more then anything.. I would love to see what it would do with some decent tires and alignment(or maybe a test and tune night where they prep the track).
. Maybe we'll get to try in a couple weeks...-- Ed
03-24-2010, 11:13 PM
#37
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: I wuv imprezeR with all muh heartz. CareBearZ fur
Posts: 582
Car Info: 05' Evo MR w/E85 - 10' Ralliart Sportback w/E85
A 1.73 60ft but you have traction problems in 4th? BS flag
C'mon now... run a real time with a 35R (not slower then 400whp evo stock turbo times) then you won't have to make up BS excuses..
C'mon now... run a real time with a 35R (not slower then 400whp evo stock turbo times) then you won't have to make up BS excuses..
Last edited by earlyapex; 03-24-2010 at 11:16 PM.
03-24-2010, 11:15 PM
#38
found this on evo em, they have a lot to say about it lol. o well no hard feelings, everyone has opinions
http://evoempire.org/index.php/topic...3&#entry129233
http://evoempire.org/index.php/topic...3&#entry129233
Last edited by Static Fitment; 03-25-2010 at 02:20 AM.
03-25-2010, 12:03 AM
#40
found this on evo em, they have a lot to say about it lol. o well no hard feelings, everyone has opinions
http://evoempire.org/index.php/topic...suck-this-bad/
http://evoempire.org/index.php/topic...suck-this-bad/
03-25-2010, 12:34 AM
#43
Last edited by Static Fitment; 03-25-2010 at 02:20 AM.
03-25-2010, 01:07 AM
#45
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: tipping 300
Posts: 1,571
Car Info: 03 Bugeye, D675, Lightning
Well that was fun!
11.8 @ 122mph with ZERO traction. As the track got colder, the car was wanting to spin through 4th gear! I guess its not bad for not having been to the strip in about 6 years and never having run faster than a 14 before
.
Also, big congrats to Dallas for putting together a great run and hitting 12.6 @ 108mph in his stage 2 STI!
I think next time we'll try Sac raceway and see how it compares.
Thanks
-- Ed
11.8 @ 122mph with ZERO traction. As the track got colder, the car was wanting to spin through 4th gear! I guess its not bad for not having been to the strip in about 6 years and never having run faster than a 14 before
.Also, big congrats to Dallas for putting together a great run and hitting 12.6 @ 108mph in his stage 2 STI!
I think next time we'll try Sac raceway and see how it compares.
Thanks
-- Ed