Tiger attack brothers arrested yet again
08-06-2009, 01:00 PM
#1
Tiger attack brothers arrested yet again
http://cbs5.com/local/dhaliwal.broth...2.1117707.html
this story is just a never ending comedy to me 
Two San Jose brothers attacked by a tiger at the San Francisco Zoo in 2007 have been arrested yet again, this time for drunken driving, public drunkeness, a parole violation and providing false identification, according to San Mateo police on Thursday.
San Mateo police made the arrests Wednesday following a traffic stop of a car driven by 25-year-old Kulbir Dhaliwal. His brother, 21-year-old Amirtpal "Paul" Dhaliwal, was a passenger in the vehicle.
Police said they smelled the odor of marijuana when they approached the car and found an open bottle of vodka inside. A police statement also noted that Kulbir Dhaliwal failed a field sobriety test and Paul Dhaliwal provided false identification.
San Mateo police made the arrests Wednesday following a traffic stop of a car driven by 25-year-old Kulbir Dhaliwal. His brother, 21-year-old Amirtpal "Paul" Dhaliwal, was a passenger in the vehicle.
Police said they smelled the odor of marijuana when they approached the car and found an open bottle of vodka inside. A police statement also noted that Kulbir Dhaliwal failed a field sobriety test and Paul Dhaliwal provided false identification.
08-06-2009, 01:10 PM
#2
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yokosuka, Japan
Posts: 3,632
Car Info: 2008 EVO X/1991 Nissan Skyline GT-R32
looks like that 900000 will be going back to the court systems.
my question is how do they have a few previous felony charges within a year and are not in prison?
my question is how do they have a few previous felony charges within a year and are not in prison?
08-06-2009, 01:36 PM
#7
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 22,776
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
They really need to be forced to make a public apology to the SF Zoo saying that they were "moronic ****tards that taunted the tiger and got what they deserved." (in those words) Then they need to give back the money they were awarded, and the Zoo should sue them for the lost profits since less people have been visiting the zoo since the attack.
08-06-2009, 02:26 PM
#10
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 22,776
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
They didn't have to make a higher glass wall, they had to actually make one! There was no barrier besides a 3 foot wrought iron fence. I'm sure the exhibit was on the list for remodeling as its one of the oldest at the zoo.
08-06-2009, 02:38 PM
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tahoe City, CA
Posts: 4,028
Car Info: 2016 FXT
jeeezus. just read a few of those articles.
- felony reckless driving
- dui
- marijuana possession
- cocaine possession
- shoplifting
no need for character witnesses with a resume' like this.
- felony reckless driving
- dui
- marijuana possession
- cocaine possession
- shoplifting
no need for character witnesses with a resume' like this.
