Some girls throwing puppies into a river
08-31-2010, 10:24 AM
#91
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 1,093
Car Info: VF48'd WRB Bugeye
http://www.lifewithdogs.tv/2010/08/f...ght-on-camera/
And if you are on Facebook don't forget to report this page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Throwi...3973722?ref=mf
And if you are on Facebook don't forget to report this page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Throwi...3973722?ref=mf
Last edited by WRX USA; 08-31-2010 at 10:31 AM.
08-31-2010, 12:25 PM
#94
I can honestly say that I wouldn't hit her, at all. I'd just tie her up and let the public do the rest.
08-31-2010, 12:53 PM
#95
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hangin in Placerville youtube.com/rallydude1515
Posts: 11,892
Car Info: 1999 RS Coupé- 1995 Mazda Miata -KTM 300
An eye for an eye makes the whole world a lot better.
The equivalent punishment, based on physical dimesions, would be putting her in a garbage toter along with 10 other sickos...Then a massive garbage crane claw puling them out as they are loaded onto a catapult and flung into the river at the bottom of the Grand Canyon.
The equivalent punishment, based on physical dimesions, would be putting her in a garbage toter along with 10 other sickos...Then a massive garbage crane claw puling them out as they are loaded onto a catapult and flung into the river at the bottom of the Grand Canyon.
08-31-2010, 01:19 PM
#97
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 6,155
Car Info: R.I.P 03 aspen white wrx
OK, I've just saw the vid and even if its not very pleasant to watch, I only see here a kind of "births control"... It is maybe better that the puppies dies directly instead of letting them alone in the woods and that they get eaten by rats or foxes or whatever... And also, I didn't really noticed that the girl was particulary enjoying the "job", maybe her father or anyone else ordered her to act this way and she just had to obey... anyway, she killed them the most "soft" way in my opinion, she didn't break their skulls with rocks or anything like this... People over here take this stuff too seriously I think, you must understand that in balkans and eastern europe, we do not consider animals like persons, as many westerners do with their pets, and which is most of the time, completely ridiculous... and about the way she throws them, I guess that she simply don't want to see their die at her feets, while at the middle of the river, she is sure to do not see them die, which makes sense...
From our pov, animals existence needs to be useful, they must help us or feed us, we don't have the luxe to be emotional about them, that does not mean that people over there like to be cruel with animals, but what have to be done, must be done, and if puppies or kittens cannot be adopted by anyone, then killing them by the less violent way is often considered as the most correct solution to the problem.
From our pov, animals existence needs to be useful, they must help us or feed us, we don't have the luxe to be emotional about them, that does not mean that people over there like to be cruel with animals, but what have to be done, must be done, and if puppies or kittens cannot be adopted by anyone, then killing them by the less violent way is often considered as the most correct solution to the problem.
and feel as he does about all this 100%
08-31-2010, 01:52 PM
#101
And if you are on Facebook don't forget to report this page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Throwi...3973722?ref=mf
170 People Like This
08-31-2010, 02:57 PM
#103
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 2,329
Car Info: always changing...
Quote:
OK, I've just saw the vid and even if its not very pleasant to watch, I only see here a kind of "births control"... It is maybe better that the puppies dies directly instead of letting them alone in the woods and that they get eaten by rats or foxes or whatever... And also, I didn't really noticed that the girl was particulary enjoying the "job", maybe her father or anyone else ordered her to act this way and she just had to obey... anyway, she killed them the most "soft" way in my opinion, she didn't break their skulls with rocks or anything like this... People over here take this stuff too seriously I think, you must understand that in balkans and eastern europe, we do not consider animals like persons, as many westerners do with their pets, and which is most of the time, completely ridiculous... and about the way she throws them, I guess that she simply don't want to see their die at her feets, while at the middle of the river, she is sure to do not see them die, which makes sense...
From our pov, animals existence needs to be useful, they must help us or feed us, we don't have the luxe to be emotional about them, that does not mean that people over there like to be cruel with animals, but what have to be done, must be done, and if puppies or kittens cannot be adopted by anyone, then killing them by the less violent way is often considered as the most correct solution to the problem.
I'm sort of confused by your post. What are you trying to say?
OK, I've just saw the vid and even if its not very pleasant to watch, I only see here a kind of "births control"... It is maybe better that the puppies dies directly instead of letting them alone in the woods and that they get eaten by rats or foxes or whatever... And also, I didn't really noticed that the girl was particulary enjoying the "job", maybe her father or anyone else ordered her to act this way and she just had to obey... anyway, she killed them the most "soft" way in my opinion, she didn't break their skulls with rocks or anything like this... People over here take this stuff too seriously I think, you must understand that in balkans and eastern europe, we do not consider animals like persons, as many westerners do with their pets, and which is most of the time, completely ridiculous... and about the way she throws them, I guess that she simply don't want to see their die at her feets, while at the middle of the river, she is sure to do not see them die, which makes sense...
From our pov, animals existence needs to be useful, they must help us or feed us, we don't have the luxe to be emotional about them, that does not mean that people over there like to be cruel with animals, but what have to be done, must be done, and if puppies or kittens cannot be adopted by anyone, then killing them by the less violent way is often considered as the most correct solution to the problem.
taken from http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...o-a-lake/page6
and feel as he does about all this 100%
and feel as he does about all this 100%
08-31-2010, 03:03 PM
#105
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 7,441
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Quote:
OK, I've just saw the vid and even if its not very pleasant to watch, I only see here a kind of "births control"... It is maybe better that the puppies dies directly instead of letting them alone in the woods and that they get eaten by rats or foxes or whatever... And also, I didn't really noticed that the girl was particulary enjoying the "job", maybe her father or anyone else ordered her to act this way and she just had to obey... anyway, she killed them the most "soft" way in my opinion, she didn't break their skulls with rocks or anything like this... People over here take this stuff too seriously I think, you must understand that in balkans and eastern europe, we do not consider animals like persons, as many westerners do with their pets, and which is most of the time, completely ridiculous... and about the way she throws them, I guess that she simply don't want to see their die at her feets, while at the middle of the river, she is sure to do not see them die, which makes sense...
From our pov, animals existence needs to be useful, they must help us or feed us, we don't have the luxe to be emotional about them, that does not mean that people over there like to be cruel with animals, but what have to be done, must be done, and if puppies or kittens cannot be adopted by anyone, then killing them by the less violent way is often considered as the most correct solution to the problem.
I'm sort of confused by your post. What are you trying to say?
OK, I've just saw the vid and even if its not very pleasant to watch, I only see here a kind of "births control"... It is maybe better that the puppies dies directly instead of letting them alone in the woods and that they get eaten by rats or foxes or whatever... And also, I didn't really noticed that the girl was particulary enjoying the "job", maybe her father or anyone else ordered her to act this way and she just had to obey... anyway, she killed them the most "soft" way in my opinion, she didn't break their skulls with rocks or anything like this... People over here take this stuff too seriously I think, you must understand that in balkans and eastern europe, we do not consider animals like persons, as many westerners do with their pets, and which is most of the time, completely ridiculous... and about the way she throws them, I guess that she simply don't want to see their die at her feets, while at the middle of the river, she is sure to do not see them die, which makes sense...
From our pov, animals existence needs to be useful, they must help us or feed us, we don't have the luxe to be emotional about them, that does not mean that people over there like to be cruel with animals, but what have to be done, must be done, and if puppies or kittens cannot be adopted by anyone, then killing them by the less violent way is often considered as the most correct solution to the problem.
I'm sort of confused by your post. What are you trying to say?