sighting on the news
06-04-2003, 11:24 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: TRAVIS A.F.B.
Posts: 1,128
Car Info: 03 sedan 2nd wrx
sighting on the news
Saw J.J. on the news at sac. raceway during the 2fast interviews
he said he ran 14 flat @ 100mph I think he has a vishnu stage 2
it is a silver sedan
he said he ran 14 flat @ 100mph I think he has a vishnu stage 2
it is a silver sedan
06-04-2003, 11:50 PM
#2
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: watching you get smaller...in my rear-view
Posts: 4,962
Car Info: 02 STi
Re: sighting on the news
Originally posted by DWNSHFT
he said he ran 14 flat @ 100mph I think he has a vishnu stage 2
he said he ran 14 flat @ 100mph I think he has a vishnu stage 2
sure it wasn't a 13. flat????-freddie
06-05-2003, 12:23 AM
#3
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Re: Re: sighting on the news
Originally posted by 1WRX2NV
sure it wasn't a 13. flat????
-freddie
sure it wasn't a 13. flat????-freddie
hahahahaha
what the?????
06-05-2003, 05:18 PM
#9
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,416
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
Originally posted by lisa
He didn't go to the track.
His punk a** bia*** ***** f***er FRIEND didn't go.
Lisa
He didn't go to the track.
His punk a** bia*** ***** f***er FRIEND didn't go.
Lisa
well, i might as well hop on the i hate vishnu bandwagon. yeah that stuff totally sucks!! there was a vishnu uppipe on my car when i bought it and now it's LEAKING!! can you imagine that?!?! a leaking downpipe. there must be a hole in that piece of crap...
oh yeah, and VS2? i'm surprised it didn't go a 17 flat!!! HA!! those VS2s SUCK!!!
06-05-2003, 07:00 PM
#11
NASIOC Slut
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 4,723
Car Info: 1995 Subaru Impreza 1.8 L
I saw a stage 0 with a turbo back exhaust run a 13.6 at sac raceway.
Anyhow, I saw the segment, didnt recognize the driver or the car. Good stuff though as he promotoed track racing as opposed to street racing.
Anyhow, I saw the segment, didnt recognize the driver or the car. Good stuff though as he promotoed track racing as opposed to street racing.
06-05-2003, 10:41 PM
#12
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 10,029
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX sedan
Originally posted by BAN SUVS
I would hope so... you'd need what, a 2.8 60 footer to run 14@100?
100 mph through the traps is respectable for a mildly tuned car (ala bolt-ons and re-flash, but no internal engine mods). 14 seconds flat seems a little on the slow side for the trap speed. This sounds like the driver is babying the clutch off the line instead of dumping it at 4 or 5k with sticky radials.
Trap speed is the indicator of engine power, not the E.T.
--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
I would hope so... you'd need what, a 2.8 60 footer to run 14@100?
100 mph through the traps is respectable for a mildly tuned car (ala bolt-ons and re-flash, but no internal engine mods). 14 seconds flat seems a little on the slow side for the trap speed. This sounds like the driver is babying the clutch off the line instead of dumping it at 4 or 5k with sticky radials.
Trap speed is the indicator of engine power, not the E.T.
--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
06-05-2003, 11:52 PM
#13
Dahveed aka Robin Hood
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Robbin' the Hood (Claycord)
Posts: 4,793
Car Info: (RIP) '04 STi Silver
Yes, lower E.T.'s are the product of ruining your clutch and shredding your POS stock tranny....
....I hate my tranny....
....I hate my tranny....
Originally posted by Wingless Wonder
Originally posted by BAN SUVS
I would hope so... you'd need what, a 2.8 60 footer to run 14@100?
100 mph through the traps is respectable for a mildly tuned car (ala bolt-ons and re-flash, but no internal engine mods). 14 seconds flat seems a little on the slow side for the trap speed. This sounds like the driver is babying the clutch off the line instead of dumping it at 4 or 5k with sticky radials.
Trap speed is the indicator of engine power, not the E.T.
--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
Originally posted by BAN SUVS
I would hope so... you'd need what, a 2.8 60 footer to run 14@100?
100 mph through the traps is respectable for a mildly tuned car (ala bolt-ons and re-flash, but no internal engine mods). 14 seconds flat seems a little on the slow side for the trap speed. This sounds like the driver is babying the clutch off the line instead of dumping it at 4 or 5k with sticky radials.
Trap speed is the indicator of engine power, not the E.T.
--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post