The rumor is the Pats might trade Welker. Knowing Bills, this might be true.



Anyways, I voted against the trade.

 

Wait you voted against your own trade? Dude... you land those two guys and you could be unstoppable. LOL!

Honestly... with the way he's changing the offense... 2 TE's all the time with 2 splits I think he's wasting welker. They can Branch to do what they're doing with Welker.

I personally think the way they're handling welker is stupid. The patriots are on the decline. If he can get out and get somewhere like say... Baltimore. Probably be used better.


The patriots now have 3 KILLER tight ends on the roster so I see them running 2 TE pretty much all the time and possibly having all 3 on the field from time to time.

Welker is still the best receiver they have.

 

They just need to use their guys correctly. Lloyd is good but he's not THAT good.


And I honestly don't see them doing all that much this year. Their defense is o.k. There offense is o.k. But nothing is great outside of the TE position. The RB spot is pretty weak. At WR they're solid but not great. I personally think they should put Branch at the number 2 spot and move Welker back to the slot. Run more 3 wide.

 

I want Branch at the slot to get me more receptions.

 

I want to do the trade. I know what I'm doing. I won the league last year... Please don't veto.

 

Also, Bennet played for me this week so i won't need a TE until next week and I see a couple on waivers I like. I'm not going say anything about the players in the trade but what I think about the players since I'm involved in the trade and did it for a reason.

Also, my policy on trades is I let them go through unless there is collusion involved.

I can also trade some of my WR's for RBs and I'll be dropping a WR for a TE.

 

I'm still ok with the trade.

 

That was my only hold back... it felt like that because of the hole left at TE and the fact that you weren't upgrading anywhere. The only way the trade mades sense is if you already had another trade lined up with someone else involving one or both of the guys you were getting and someone currently on your team... like basically doing a 3 team trade. No one on waivers is as solid at TE as what you've got. There are 2 out there that are good but not that good. You need some help at RB and justin needs some help at WR so maybe that's what you were trying to get going.

If you're not trying to bail out, dump players and the trade has a purpose then I'm fine with it. I'm just over sensitive because I've seen it before. Guys that get a bad start and just say screw it and dump of players to their friends. Pisses me off. You end up having to play people that are unstoppable.

So if the trade is legit and you want it... then do it.

As a commish I usually let people do what they're gonna do unless someone is doing what we're talking about and that was my fear.

It's early.. can't tell who's gonna do what. I always trip out on people that trade so early in the season anyways. LOL. I'm more of a draft strategy and waiver guru kind of dude. Haaaa.


But I can't really say **** as I'm currently in first so of course I don't want people improving. LOL>

 

I think I'm upgrading and my RBs are fine right now and will be good when forte gets back since Sporles is good in .5 PPR and Law Firm is consistent. I also have Hillis and LeShoure who might become the led back for their teams if someone gets hurt or if they start out well.

 

yaaaaaaay replacement refs.

 

Finally Charles has a great game and I had him on the bench.

 

Welcome back Fitz!!!

 

Me too.

 

Man I lost two important players to injuries today. No good for me. Like I said though... Spiller was gonna get me a hot start and my team would suck at the end.

 

Pick up Choice!!