My amatuer photoshoot with over the top editing (picture heavy)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2011 | 10:06 PM
  #1  
Jodice112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,334
From: San Jose, Ca
Car Info: '06 WRB STi
My amatuer photoshoot with over the top editing (picture heavy)

Took a couple pictures yesterday and I played around with them in iPhoto so they are a bit over the top

Name:  DSC_0137.jpg
Views: 34
Size:  208.7 KB

Name:  DSC_0209.jpg
Views: 71
Size:  119.4 KB

Name:  DSC_0224.jpg
Views: 90
Size:  226.8 KB

Name:  DSC_0219.jpg
Views: 29
Size:  187.6 KB

Name:  DSC_0266.jpg
Views: 70
Size:  151.4 KB

Name:  DSC_0303.jpg
Views: 27
Size:  59.7 KB

Name:  DSC_0316.jpg
Views: 34
Size:  202.0 KB

Name:  DSC_0342.jpg
Views: 27
Size:  298.2 KB

Name:  DSC_0354.jpg
Views: 79
Size:  272.3 KB

Name:  DSC_0295.jpg
Views: 81
Size:  163.7 KB

Name:  DSC_0357.jpg
Views: 68
Size:  173.8 KB

Name:  DSC_0400.jpg
Views: 68
Size:  111.4 KB
Old 07-31-2011 | 10:11 PM
  #2  
golfsick's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 750
From: central valley
Car Info: EQ tuned v8 ej207 and loving it!!!
Nice pics good job=)
Old 07-31-2011 | 10:11 PM
  #3  
dub599's Avatar
Identifier of i-Club members
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 679
From: bay area
Car Info: 2009 wrx
Originally Posted by Jodice112

this is an amazing idea for a picture. i will be stealing this. but overall your pictures are great. im interested to know what kind of camera/ lens used for the pics.
Old 07-31-2011 | 10:16 PM
  #4  
Jodice112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,334
From: San Jose, Ca
Car Info: '06 WRB STi
I'm using a Nikon D90 with a 18-55mm and a polarizing filter.

Yeah I would always take reflective pictures in my gf's glasses so I thought I would try it here
Old 07-31-2011 | 10:26 PM
  #5  
Irrational X's Avatar
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
iphoto? get lightroom or PS
Old 07-31-2011 | 10:34 PM
  #6  
Jodice112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,334
From: San Jose, Ca
Car Info: '06 WRB STi
Originally Posted by irrational x
iphoto? get lightroom or PS
Yeah I have photoshop on my PC but I was lazy and only uploaded them to my Mac
Old 07-31-2011 | 11:31 PM
  #7  
buzzword's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,294
From: Logic
Car Info: Reason
I think you have a pretty good eye for composition and such, but I want to throatpunch whomever is responsible for popularizing HDR in automotive photography.
Old 07-31-2011 | 11:37 PM
  #8  
Jodice112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,334
From: San Jose, Ca
Car Info: '06 WRB STi
It was very cloudy out so all the pictures that had part of the sky in it I spiced up a bit but then I got carried away

Even the normal looking sky photo had some adjustments in it. Any tips would definitely be appreciated on settings and composure. I didn't bring my tripod a long so the pictures weren't perfectly aligned.
Old 08-01-2011 | 12:20 AM
  #9  
McLovinMyWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 545
From: Palo Alto, CA
Car Info: 2011 Infiniti G37
pix look great! love your car, very clean!
Old 08-01-2011 | 12:25 AM
  #10  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Originally Posted by Jodice112
It was very cloudy out so all the pictures that had part of the sky in it I spiced up a bit but then I got carried away

Even the normal looking sky photo had some adjustments in it. Any tips would definitely be appreciated on settings and composure. I didn't bring my tripod a long so the pictures weren't perfectly aligned.
Advice? Stay. Away. From. HDR.

No really, STAY. AWAY. FROM. HDR.

Now that you've got that down, STAY! AWAY! FROM! HDR!

Beyond that, some good composition and great concepts. The HDR really kills it though.
Old 08-01-2011 | 12:33 AM
  #11  
Jodice112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,334
From: San Jose, Ca
Car Info: '06 WRB STi
Originally Posted by VRT MBasile
Advice? Stay. Away. From. HDR.

No really, STAY. AWAY. FROM. HDR.

Now that you've got that down, STAY! AWAY! FROM! HDR!

Beyond that, some good composition and great concepts. The HDR really kills it though.
Yeah I'll definitely stay away from the HDR-esque photos now that I just got Aperture for my Mac. I'm going to try to shoot in RAW and see what I can do with it.
Old 08-01-2011 | 12:45 AM
  #12  
StealthMODE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,742
From: philz coffee
Car Info: @eatwithnaveed
my new best friend on ps is lightroom. i love it!!!
Old 08-01-2011 | 12:54 AM
  #13  
JAC Wagon's Avatar
I paid $200 to charity and all I got was this stupid title... oh, and I'm probably out to sea right now too.
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,747
From: San Francisco
Car Info: '02 WRB Bugeye Wagon
Hdr??
Old 08-01-2011 | 12:59 AM
  #14  
StealthMODE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,742
From: philz coffee
Car Info: @eatwithnaveed
Originally Posted by JAC Wagon
Hdr??
yeah. a few year ago, a few editing guys decided it was cool to take a cloudy pic and make it look stormy. wasnt a bad idea at first. but then people started over doing it. it basicly makes shades look nicer. (darks darker, lights highlighted, etc) but when its over done, it looks extra cartoony and not nice. people dont use it much anymore because legit editors crapped on them with just normal editing. id much rather just manually adjust colors and use light room. it makes the pics look amazing without any cartoonish looks.
Old 08-01-2011 | 01:01 AM
  #15  
Jodice112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,334
From: San Jose, Ca
Car Info: '06 WRB STi
Originally Posted by JAC Wagon
Hdr??
It stands for High Dynamic Range.

It's basically taking different exposures of the same picture 3 times and combining them together. So there would be an underexposed photo (-0.7) a normal exposure photo (0.0) and overexposed photo (+0.7) combined together.


I can't really explain it that well but that's how you do it.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 PM.