Here's why you don't txt while driving

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2011 | 12:16 PM
  #16  
JelloChex's Avatar
aka FlukeWRX
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,657
From: East Bay
Car Info: '03 WRX WRB Sedan
U.S. News - US calls for ban on in-car phone use ... even with Bluetooth
Old 12-13-2011 | 12:16 PM
  #17  
DerekB707's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,457
From: 509
Car Info: 07 rs STi swapped Rotated BW S200SX-56
I couldn't even tell that was a pickup.
Old 12-13-2011 | 12:16 PM
  #18  
Guillermo's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,349
From: Mesa, AZ
Car Info: DGM BRZ
Originally Posted by stupidchicken03
If you read the article then you would know the 19 year old driving the truck died and a 15 year old on one of the buses. Along with 30+ injuries
I highlighted the problem. You're expecting too much
Old 12-13-2011 | 12:20 PM
  #19  
slow04wrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,452
seems like a miracle only 2 died.


Yeah clearly a way for the other drivers to get out of liability
Old 12-13-2011 | 12:46 PM
  #20  
OneManArmy's Avatar
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
Originally Posted by Krinkov
Exactly. The headline really wants to make the point about texting while driving, okay. But there's plenty of reasons people get rear ended besides texting, that does not explain at all how the other 11 cars behind him piled up, are they saying that's ok though because they were not texting?

A bit more context please.
That was exactly what I was thinking. The bus drivers are getting off early.

I'm wondering if they're sure that the kid even rear ended the truck to begin with. Seems to me with how far that bus is stuck up that dudes butt that maybe the truck stopped in time and it was actually the bus that caused the whole ordeal.

The second bus you can kind of feel for because they can't see much beyond the bus in front of them (should be following farther behind). But the first bus looks to be the one that should be held at fault here. Just because someone was texting doesn't mean they caused the accident.


I try to keep it to a minimum but I have texted while driving and I've had people nearly cause an accident with me... One of them nearly drove me off the road. Should I be held responsible for that person's poor driving because I was texting? Hell the only reason I saw them was because I turned my head to put my phone in my cup holder. In all actuality my texting stopped an accident.
Old 12-13-2011 | 01:13 PM
  #21  
iLoqin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
There were many at fault besides one right here.

In any case, that sucks.
Old 12-13-2011 | 01:14 PM
  #22  
stupidchicken03's Avatar
Churro Aficionado
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 54,642
From: IG - @thomas.teammoist
Car Info: IG - @TEAMMOISTOFFICIAL
Originally Posted by Guillermo
I highlighted the problem. You're expecting too much
Old 12-13-2011 | 01:37 PM
  #23  
Heedz's Avatar
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
I highly doubt they will be able to completely outlaw usage of handsfree devices. Think about the bluetooth headunits a lot of people have in their cars like I do.
Old 12-13-2011 | 01:46 PM
  #24  
chimchimm5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,311
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 2011 WRX hatch gray
Originally Posted by tesh
am I one of the few who looks a few cars ahead for a slow down / brake lights? because it looks like the bus driver was focused on the truck's brake lights, he didnt see them (or it was too late) , rather than looking ahead across the horizon at the quickly approaching tractor trailer (which was probably at a stop or slowdown)...
Are you the only one? No... but you, me, and other drivers who do are apparently a small minority. You can tell when traffic does its slinky job... and tons of constantly sudden brake lights.

I'm watching how the "snake" of traffic is moving and often I don't need to brake at all because I'm anticipating the flow.
Old 12-13-2011 | 02:43 PM
  #25  
04GG's Avatar
Thread Starter
If in doubt, FLAT OUT
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,045
From: Nor Cal SJ
Car Info: 2010 Hatch, 2011 Sedan
My guess is it was around a curve and they were all likely above the limit. The semi must have been stopped or going slow. I think they are getting at the fact that if the kid in the truck had been paying attention, the accident may have been avoided or not been as bad at least. The severity of the accident may have been worsened by TXTing.
Old 12-13-2011 | 03:43 PM
  #26  
nokio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 380
From: Sunnyvale
My summation of the story: Kid is texting while driving, "He had an average of about five and a half hours of sleep a night in the days leading up to the accident and had had fewer than five hours of sleep the night before the accident..." (Note: This quote is near the bottom of the story, in between the agenda being ejaculated all over the page)

A bus driver who was not paying attention (probably drunk/masturbating) killed the driver of the truck, who had just rear-ended a trailer-less semi due to fatigue and not paying attention to the road, and a passenger in his/her own bus as well as injuring several other students on the two buses involved in the accident.

No charges have been made against the school bus driver.


Disclaimer: My opinion.
Old 12-13-2011 | 04:10 PM
  #27  
pho_shizzle's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,542
From: SLZ
Car Info: MY00 GC6 BRP
Originally Posted by Heedz
I highly doubt they will be able to completely outlaw usage of handsfree devices. Think about the bluetooth headunits a lot of people have in their cars like I do.
Yea they won't do this..... they'll be retarded to. The problem isn't bad equipment, the problem is STUPID ****ING PEOPLE!!!!!!!! Stop trying to dumb down america by blaming it on the gadgets that you solely designed, instead edumacate your damn people.


If I ever text in the car, it's most likely with swype since i can just move my finger and keep my eyes on the road. Now if I even DO text, its short messages or something that is urgent. I also don't text around crowded areas, keeping in mind of a buffer zone just in case I need to react to something else. Other than that, eh it can wait. I see stupid ppl react very violently on the roads within a split second, so **** can hit the fan at any time..........
Old 12-13-2011 | 04:12 PM
  #28  
04GG's Avatar
Thread Starter
If in doubt, FLAT OUT
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,045
From: Nor Cal SJ
Car Info: 2010 Hatch, 2011 Sedan
I'd say the vast majority of problems can be traced down to stupid f***ing people.
Old 12-13-2011 | 07:10 PM
  #29  
i-STi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 24
From: Bay Area, CA
Car Info: 7 Series
Wow.. that is bad.. As others have said, how does him texting cause the buses to rear end him? The buses should have had a high enough line of vision to tell that there was a semi coming in and fast.. The second bus, I understand.. but the first I don't really quite get.
Old 12-13-2011 | 07:21 PM
  #30  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Originally Posted by Pearl07STI
thats crazy... someday people will learn
Unfortunately they won't. "It won't happen to me."


Quick Reply: Here's why you don't txt while driving



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:35 PM.