FORESTER Tips!!
06-24-2011, 02:21 PM
#16
The outback doesn't have **** for aftermarket. They haven't even figured out how to lower the damn things yet. Wife and I both said that we wished they had the LGT or just Legacy wagons period. I think it's stupid that they only have the giant 9inch monster truck version. If we could get one lowered on 18's we'd both be stoked. LOL>
The euro/*** versions of the outback are awesome!
The euro/*** versions of the outback are awesome!
I can't tell you how many times I've steered family/friends/others into Subarus and now they don't even offer one that I can/want to buy for the family.
The sad thing is that I'm now about 99% certain that we're going to end up with a 2008ish Toyota Sienna AWD minivan.
-Brian
06-24-2011, 02:38 PM
#17
My sister got the nissan mini van. Thing is PIMP! But no way in hell will I EVER drive a mini-van. F that isht!
Oh... and the XXX out was short for JAPANESE. Stupid censors.
Yeah the forums are talking about trying to get the euro spec stuff brought into the us. EVERYTHING about that car is better. No stupid lego side clad. The huge ugly rails are replaced with nice low pro ones like on previous legacy's. Lower. HID's. Etc.
Friggin lame. I don't know why they don't just do one friggin car.
Oh... and the XXX out was short for JAPANESE. Stupid censors.
Yeah the forums are talking about trying to get the euro spec stuff brought into the us. EVERYTHING about that car is better. No stupid lego side clad. The huge ugly rails are replaced with nice low pro ones like on previous legacy's. Lower. HID's. Etc.
Friggin lame. I don't know why they don't just do one friggin car.
06-24-2011, 03:16 PM
#18
My sister got the nissan mini van. Thing is PIMP! But no way in hell will I EVER drive a mini-van. F that isht!
Oh... and the XXX out was short for JAPANESE. Stupid censors.
Yeah the forums are talking about trying to get the euro spec stuff brought into the us. EVERYTHING about that car is better. No stupid lego side clad. The huge ugly rails are replaced with nice low pro ones like on previous legacy's. Lower. HID's. Etc.
Friggin lame. I don't know why they don't just do one friggin car.
Oh... and the XXX out was short for JAPANESE. Stupid censors.
Yeah the forums are talking about trying to get the euro spec stuff brought into the us. EVERYTHING about that car is better. No stupid lego side clad. The huge ugly rails are replaced with nice low pro ones like on previous legacy's. Lower. HID's. Etc.
Friggin lame. I don't know why they don't just do one friggin car.
Same reason we no longer get a Legacy wagon and the same reason Volvo is no longer going to be importing wagons to the U.S. Stupid consumers choosing SUV/Crossovers over uber-functional and well handling wagons.I DON'T WANT A TALL WAGON. I just want a regular wagon (and it will DEFINITELY see more dirt/"offroad" driving than 95% of all SUV/Crossovers sold in America).
-Brian
06-24-2011, 03:17 PM
#19
Registered User
My sister got the nissan mini van. Thing is PIMP! But no way in hell will I EVER drive a mini-van. F that isht!
Oh... and the XXX out was short for JAPANESE. Stupid censors.
Yeah the forums are talking about trying to get the euro spec stuff brought into the us. EVERYTHING about that car is better. No stupid lego side clad. The huge ugly rails are replaced with nice low pro ones like on previous legacy's. Lower. HID's. Etc.
Friggin lame. I don't know why they don't just do one friggin car.
Oh... and the XXX out was short for JAPANESE. Stupid censors.
Yeah the forums are talking about trying to get the euro spec stuff brought into the us. EVERYTHING about that car is better. No stupid lego side clad. The huge ugly rails are replaced with nice low pro ones like on previous legacy's. Lower. HID's. Etc.
Friggin lame. I don't know why they don't just do one friggin car.
The "huge ugly rails" are useful for those looking for roof-cargo capability.
Increased ground clearance makes for improved off-road capability. I know there aren't too many that take Outbacks off-road, but it IS marketed as a semi-off-road capable wagon. It would be very stupid to market a vehicle as "off-pavement worthy" and make it too low to the ground...
In fact, I'm quite happy the USA gets the highest ground clearance of all the other Outbacks.
But I will agree Subaru should have kept the 2.5XT, especially with the manual. The manual can only be had with the base naturally-aspirated EJ25
Oh, and yes, it is a shame the Legacy wagon isn't sold here anymore
06-24-2011, 03:31 PM
#20
Also, since the next vehicle we purchase will be the one the wifey drives the majority of the time, I'm having an easier time convincing myself that the minivan is the way to go. Better handling than most SUVs and can fit 6 comfortably, 7 in a pinch. They're also the most functional/practical vehicle for a family IMHO. I know it's super cliche, but carting around a kid(s), their friend(s) and all the associated crap makes you really wish you had a vehicle that was a bit bigger. I assume it's only going to get worse when we have a second child. Since Toyota is the only manufacturer offering an AWD option, we're pretty much locked into a Sienna. It's not the perfect solution, but I think it'll fit our needs pretty damn well...now where's that Toyota supercharger kit :P.
-Brian
-Brian
06-24-2011, 03:35 PM
#21
The side clad is to prevent any expensive-looking body repairs for those who actually take it off-pavement.
The "huge ugly rails" are useful for those looking for roof-cargo capability.
Increased ground clearance makes for improved off-road capability. I know there aren't too many that take Outbacks off-road, but it IS marketed as a semi-off-road capable wagon. It would be very stupid to market a vehicle as "off-pavement worthy" and make it too low to the ground...
In fact, I'm quite happy the USA gets the highest ground clearance of all the other Outbacks.
But I will agree Subaru should have kept the 2.5XT, especially with the manual. The manual can only be had with the base naturally-aspirated EJ25
Oh, and yes, it is a shame the Legacy wagon isn't sold here anymore
The "huge ugly rails" are useful for those looking for roof-cargo capability.
Increased ground clearance makes for improved off-road capability. I know there aren't too many that take Outbacks off-road, but it IS marketed as a semi-off-road capable wagon. It would be very stupid to market a vehicle as "off-pavement worthy" and make it too low to the ground...
In fact, I'm quite happy the USA gets the highest ground clearance of all the other Outbacks.
But I will agree Subaru should have kept the 2.5XT, especially with the manual. The manual can only be had with the base naturally-aspirated EJ25
Oh, and yes, it is a shame the Legacy wagon isn't sold here anymore
The huge, ugly AS HELL, rails do not provide much functionality as the crossbars do not slide and are in a fixed horizontal position as far as I am aware. That means that you have very little longitudinal adjustment for ski racks, bike racks, etc.
The standard Legacy wagon has/had enough off-road prowess for your standard issue dirt road. If you're planning on "crawlin'" or seriously off-roading then this isn't a good choice IMHO as there's too many plastic bits to scratch/crack/break off.
-Brian
06-24-2011, 03:45 PM
#23
Registered User
Dam that Euro Outback looks so clean...
I wonder what's the point of the side cladding having to have bumps and such. Maybe they wanted it to look more "tough"??? I doubt it was for any aerodynamic advantages...
As for the limited adjustability, I sure hope Subaru of America addresses the issue.
Of course most stock "regular" Subarus (which exclude the Tribeca, Outback, and Forester) have about 6 inches of ground clearance, enough for typical dirt roads. But there are Outback drivers that don't exactly go rock-crawling, but take much more rough roads than a smooth fire road.
The idea of lowering an Outback or Forester isn't one I like. It truly is a shame the Legacy wagon isn't offered here!
I wonder what's the point of the side cladding having to have bumps and such. Maybe they wanted it to look more "tough"??? I doubt it was for any aerodynamic advantages...
As for the limited adjustability, I sure hope Subaru of America addresses the issue.
Of course most stock "regular" Subarus (which exclude the Tribeca, Outback, and Forester) have about 6 inches of ground clearance, enough for typical dirt roads. But there are Outback drivers that don't exactly go rock-crawling, but take much more rough roads than a smooth fire road.
The idea of lowering an Outback or Forester isn't one I like. It truly is a shame the Legacy wagon isn't offered here!
06-24-2011, 04:04 PM
#24
Dam that Euro Outback looks so clean...
I wonder what's the point of the side cladding having to have bumps and such. Maybe they wanted it to look more "tough"??? I doubt it was for any aerodynamic advantages...
As for the limited adjustability, I sure hope Subaru of America addresses the issue.
Of course most stock "regular" Subarus (which exclude the Tribeca, Outback, and Forester) have about 6 inches of ground clearance, enough for typical dirt roads. But there are Outback drivers that don't exactly go rock-crawling, but take much more rough roads than a smooth fire road.
The idea of lowering an Outback or Forester isn't one I like. It truly is a shame the Legacy wagon isn't offered here!
I wonder what's the point of the side cladding having to have bumps and such. Maybe they wanted it to look more "tough"??? I doubt it was for any aerodynamic advantages...
As for the limited adjustability, I sure hope Subaru of America addresses the issue.
Of course most stock "regular" Subarus (which exclude the Tribeca, Outback, and Forester) have about 6 inches of ground clearance, enough for typical dirt roads. But there are Outback drivers that don't exactly go rock-crawling, but take much more rough roads than a smooth fire road.
The idea of lowering an Outback or Forester isn't one I like. It truly is a shame the Legacy wagon isn't offered here!
There isn't really a way to "fix" the idiotic roof rails other than to replace them on next years vehicles.
I've taken horribly rutted roads in my Swift-springs lowered '04 FXT. I see no need for the extra height of an Outback, but obviously, I'm in the minority because all of these Outbacks they're selling now are doing all SORTS of off roading
-Brian
06-24-2011, 05:46 PM
#25
Yeah... I drive on a CRAZY dirt road and I drive it every day with a lowered wagon. I've had my car in bumper deep snow. Driven it up a foot tall embankment of snow and had it up super gnarly fire road with huge ruts. Mud, etc.
Basically every condition you'd go wheeling in short of rock climbing... but if I was gonna do that I'd build a jeep with 24 inches of articulation. I've seriously had my car in gnarlier stuff than most people with lifted trucks have.
Basically every condition you'd go wheeling in short of rock climbing... but if I was gonna do that I'd build a jeep with 24 inches of articulation. I've seriously had my car in gnarlier stuff than most people with lifted trucks have.
06-24-2011, 06:24 PM
#26
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 369
Car Info: 02 WRX sedan
I hear you on the sport wagon, my wife wanted tall too, though. I guess that's an American thing. sport wagons don't sell. She thought about a WRX hatch for a minute, she got that gleam in her eye, but it was gone when we rode in the XC60. Lifeless car, but I don't drive it much, so whatever.
At least having a 3rd car means I can be full time E85 and basically do whatever I want to my car since my wife and daughter are almost never in it anymore.
At least having a 3rd car means I can be full time E85 and basically do whatever I want to my car since my wife and daughter are almost never in it anymore.
06-24-2011, 07:20 PM
#27
I hear you on the sport wagon, my wife wanted tall too, though. I guess that's an American thing. sport wagons don't sell. She thought about a WRX hatch for a minute, she got that gleam in her eye, but it was gone when we rode in the XC60. Lifeless car, but I don't drive it much, so whatever.
At least having a 3rd car means I can be full time E85 and basically do whatever I want to my car since my wife and daughter are almost never in it anymore.
At least having a 3rd car means I can be full time E85 and basically do whatever I want to my car since my wife and daughter are almost never in it anymore.
