View Poll Results: Which of the three would you take?
Voters: 116. You may not vote on this poll
Of the following cars, which would you take and why? (LARGE PICS!)
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 414
Car Info: WRB '08 WRX 5 Door
Sry, didnt mean to single you out there, but there seems to be a 3-1 ratio of GT2 over the Lambo and Ferrari on here. Which if it we re for subjective reasons I wouldnt mind, but it seems most here are basing it largely on the idea that it out performs the other two, soory guys but you have all been seriously misinformed
#47
I LOVE Ferrari, but I think the GT2 would perform the best. I got to go with that...
Plus, the Gallardo and F430 are just normal cars, while the GT2 is the creme de la creme of Porsche.
Plus, the Gallardo and F430 are just normal cars, while the GT2 is the creme de la creme of Porsche.
#48
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in a glass case of emotion.
Posts: 17,962
Car Info: 345/30/19s
As for performance,,, 5 posts up /\/\/\
I'll take that
#51
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: www.gunatics.com
Posts: 19,930
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
okay, Ive had it now, where in the hell are you guys hearing that the GT2 walks all over the F430 and Gallardo??? And even so, we're talking 1 or 2 tenths of second that most people here would not come close to matching in any of these cars??
So many ****ing bench racers around here that havent even had their *** in the seat of any of these cars
So many ****ing bench racers around here that havent even had their *** in the seat of any of these cars
On a side note, since we're talking about super cars, I just picked up an issue of 0-60 magazine where they featured the Bugatti EB 110... For 1991, it had an all carbon fiber body, had a 600+ HP (in the SS model) 3.5 Liter V12 with quad turbos (IHI turbos) and did 0-60 in 3.3 seconds and had AWD... All this in 1991!!! Lambos from that time are so outdated now, but this Bugatti is still one hell of a car that can totally hang with modern super cars. Such a nice car, and soooooooooo rare.
And here's a video if it, just listen to the sound of the 3.5L quad turbo V12! The waste gate sound is so nice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA2_C...layer_embedded
#52
I had to vote GT2, but only because there was no 2010 Viper ACR option. Reason being, if I had any such ridiculously expensive exotic, I would pretty much drive it exclusively on the track, and maybe once or twice a month on the street when there is a sunny Saturday or Sunday. Viper ACR is the car I want to have at the track, but the GT2 will have to suffice in this poll.
#60
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in a glass case of emotion.
Posts: 17,962
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Ahhaha, I picked those 3 cars because they were pretty similar in overall performance, and like you said, only a pro driver is going to milk those kind of numbers out of them.
On a side note, since we're talking about super cars, I just picked up an issue of 0-60 magazine where they featured the Bugatti EB 110... For 1991, it had an all carbon fiber body, had a 600+ HP (in the SS model) 3.5 Liter V12 with quad turbos (IHI turbos) and did 0-60 in 3.3 seconds and had AWD... All this in 1991!!! Lambos from that time are so outdated now, but this Bugatti is still one hell of a car that can totally hang with modern super cars. Such a nice car, and soooooooooo rare.
On a side note, since we're talking about super cars, I just picked up an issue of 0-60 magazine where they featured the Bugatti EB 110... For 1991, it had an all carbon fiber body, had a 600+ HP (in the SS model) 3.5 Liter V12 with quad turbos (IHI turbos) and did 0-60 in 3.3 seconds and had AWD... All this in 1991!!! Lambos from that time are so outdated now, but this Bugatti is still one hell of a car that can totally hang with modern super cars. Such a nice car, and soooooooooo rare.