Follow the anniversary of the Apollo launch
07-15-2009, 10:41 AM
#33
*sigh*
Youre in So Cal, go up the the Griffin observatory and ask them about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA
Scientist and astronomers all over the world use those reflectors we left there. So for the moon landing to be a hoax, not only would EVERYONE involved at NASA would had to be in on it, but also EVERY scientist and astronomer in EVERY large observatory all over the world would have to be on it as well, even the ones in Russia, you know the people we were trying to fool with this 'hoax'? seems kinda unlikely they would be covering NASAs *** dont you think?
Youre in So Cal, go up the the Griffin observatory and ask them about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA
Scientist and astronomers all over the world use those reflectors we left there. So for the moon landing to be a hoax, not only would EVERYONE involved at NASA would had to be in on it, but also EVERY scientist and astronomer in EVERY large observatory all over the world would have to be on it as well, even the ones in Russia, you know the people we were trying to fool with this 'hoax'? seems kinda unlikely they would be covering NASAs *** dont you think?
why arent there pictures of teh men on the moon through telescope?
i cant watch you tube here
Last edited by sigma pi; 07-15-2009 at 10:43 AM.
07-15-2009, 10:42 AM
#34
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Posts: 47,588
Car Info: 2001 Forester RS2 SPEC-F
*sigh*
Youre in So Cal, go up the the Griffin observatory and ask them about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA
Scientist and astronomers all over the world use those reflectors we left there. So for the moon landing to be a hoax, not only would EVERYONE involved at NASA would had to be in on it, but also EVERY scientist and astronomer in EVERY large observatory all over the world would have to be on it as well, even the ones in Russia, you know the people we were trying to fool with this 'hoax'? seems kinda unlikely they would be covering NASAs *** dont you think?
Youre in So Cal, go up the the Griffin observatory and ask them about this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmVxSFnjYCA
Scientist and astronomers all over the world use those reflectors we left there. So for the moon landing to be a hoax, not only would EVERYONE involved at NASA would had to be in on it, but also EVERY scientist and astronomer in EVERY large observatory all over the world would have to be on it as well, even the ones in Russia, you know the people we were trying to fool with this 'hoax'? seems kinda unlikely they would be covering NASAs *** dont you think?
I believe that's the nail in the coffin
07-15-2009, 11:11 AM
#42
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: pew, pew, pew!!!
Posts: 17,617
Car Info: nonplussed
That wasn't an interview. He called him "a coward, a liar, and a theif". 
I'm sure I'd be jazzed about giving interviews when all of them would some how work in the wacko conspiracy crap.
I'm sure I'd be jazzed about giving interviews when all of them would some how work in the wacko conspiracy crap.
07-15-2009, 11:28 AM
#45
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in a glass case of emotion.
Posts: 17,962
Car Info: 345/30/19s
I do not find that weird, because hes not a celebrity or attention ***** like octo mom. Hes an astronaut. And the only people that are hounding him for interviews are these hoax people and why should he give a **** about appeasing them??