CHP Crackdown Today
#18
#19
My decision to talk or not talk on a cell phone while driving is purely based on the situation. If I feel it can be done safely, then I'll do it. If not, then I don't. In general, I don't like talking while driving on surface streets in urban or suburban environments.
That being said, I also don't like my decisions of safety being made for me.
That being said, I also don't like my decisions of safety being made for me.
#20
Idiots taking themselves out, and winning a Darwin award is always funny. It helps clean up the gean pool (that IMHO needs a good cleanup right now)
#22
My decision to talk or not talk on a cell phone while driving is purely based on the situation. If I feel it can be done safely, then I'll do it. If not, then I don't. In general, I don't like talking while driving on surface streets in urban or suburban environments.
That being said, I also don't like my decisions of safety being made for me.
That being said, I also don't like my decisions of safety being made for me.
That said, for the most part I agree with you people should be able to decide what is "safe" for themselves. I disagree with seatbelt laws, helmet laws, and such.
#23
The big problem is this, your decision to talk on your phone, puts OTHERS in danger, and that you don't have a right to do. The science is sound, it is not safe to do, in fact recent studies have shown a person talking on a cellphone has the same affect as someone at a BAC of 1.0...I would say the law isn't aimed at "safety" for you, but for everyone around you.
That said, for the most part I agree with you people should be able to decide what is "safe" for themselves. I disagree with seatbelt laws, helmet laws, and such.
That said, for the most part I agree with you people should be able to decide what is "safe" for themselves. I disagree with seatbelt laws, helmet laws, and such.
I understand that they claim the law is for the safety of others. But do I believe that? Not for a second. If they really cared about driver safety and attentiveness, they would have made a law that says you cannot engage in an activity that detracts from your ability to pay attention to the road. So, no talking on a cell phone, no texting, no reading a newspaper, no eating, no putting on make up, etc. But they didn't do that -- and I'm guessing it's because they see a higher possibility for revenue relating to mobile phone laws. This is, of course, all pure conjecture on my part.
#25
#26
Let's keep that highlighted part in mind here: you and I basically agree. Having said that...
I understand that they claim the law is for the safety of others. But do I believe that? Not for a second. If they really cared about driver safety and attentiveness, they would have made a law that says you cannot engage in an activity that detracts from your ability to pay attention to the road. So, no talking on a cell phone, no texting, no reading a newspaper, no eating, no putting on make up, etc. But they didn't do that -- and I'm guessing it's because they see a higher possibility for revenue relating to mobile phone laws. This is, of course, all pure conjecture on my part.
I understand that they claim the law is for the safety of others. But do I believe that? Not for a second. If they really cared about driver safety and attentiveness, they would have made a law that says you cannot engage in an activity that detracts from your ability to pay attention to the road. So, no talking on a cell phone, no texting, no reading a newspaper, no eating, no putting on make up, etc. But they didn't do that -- and I'm guessing it's because they see a higher possibility for revenue relating to mobile phone laws. This is, of course, all pure conjecture on my part.
#28
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: pergatory
Posts: 794
Car Info: bici putas
At what, $20 a car? I don't think so.
I totally agree with the cell phone law, and I talk on my cell phone while driving. I also pay attention to the ****ing road, so when I see a CHP it's well before they can get all christmas tree.
CA really should have made the fine the same as doing 20mph over. $400 for talking on the phone would get folks' attention quiick
I totally agree with the cell phone law, and I talk on my cell phone while driving. I also pay attention to the ****ing road, so when I see a CHP it's well before they can get all christmas tree.
CA really should have made the fine the same as doing 20mph over. $400 for talking on the phone would get folks' attention quiick
#29
"Driving while using a hands-free device is not safer than using a hand held cell phone, as concluded by case-crossover studies.[2][3] epidemiological,[4][5] simulation,[7] and meta-analysis[9][10]. The increased "cognitive workload" involved in holding a conversation, not the use of hands, causes the increased risk.[13][14][15] One notable exception to that conclusion is a study by headset manufacturer Plantronics, which found 71 percent of the test subjects steered more accurately, 100 percent had faster brake reaction times, and 92 percent maintained a more consistent speed when using a headset versus handheld.[16] The consistency of increased crash risk between hands-free and hand held cell phone use is at odds with legislation in many locations that prohibits hand held cell phone use but allows hands-free. Dialing a cell phone is more distracting than talking on a cell phone, [17] and hands-free devices that offer voice-dialing may reduce or eliminate that increased risk."