BREAKING: tiger attack at SF zoo..
01-03-2008, 02:27 PM
#92
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: N38.6775* W120.0805*
Posts: 3,548
Car Info: psm.03.wrx.wgn
Originally Posted by JDM555
Originally Posted by boardoholic
Since all of us here are only contributing actual facts about this incident and not just spouting off hearsay & rumors ...
For the record Carlos Sousa Jr. & his family are of Portuguese descent. Why must people always assume folks fr the East Side are Mexican?!?
For the record Carlos Sousa Jr. & his family are of Portuguese descent. Why must people always assume folks fr the East Side are Mexican?!?
I don't know where the other guy got illegal mexicans though lol.
Originally Posted by JDM555
"...but the 17 y/o that was killed was mexican."
01-03-2008, 02:28 PM
#93
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 929
Car Info: 07 350Z
When did I say it was IN mexico? Portuguese is of course different than mexican, but to most people, your considered mexican. That's how I know it and how almost all the people I know think of it. Like I said, sorry if I wasn't 100% accurate.
Oh and F U for the South Carolina comment ***. LOL
Oh and F U for the South Carolina comment ***. LOL
01-03-2008, 03:02 PM
#96
Old School
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Union City
Posts: 14,983
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
On a more serious note, they are making a memorial for Carlos. He definitely deserves one for distracting the tiger. He made the ultimate sacrifice.
That lady that said she saw 4 guys, and said that they were messing around, she mentioned that Carlos was the one who wasn't really participating and the look on his face was "I'm sorry, my friends are ridiculous."
The more I think about this whole thing the more I want the City of SF to pin his and the tiger's death on those idiots. Manslaughter? Reckless endangerment? something
That lady that said she saw 4 guys, and said that they were messing around, she mentioned that Carlos was the one who wasn't really participating and the look on his face was "I'm sorry, my friends are ridiculous."
The more I think about this whole thing the more I want the City of SF to pin his and the tiger's death on those idiots. Manslaughter? Reckless endangerment? something
01-03-2008, 03:11 PM
#97
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SF
Posts: 629
Car Info: '00 GT Wagon, BP wannabe
And that's a panther in the picture.
The zoo will get sued because the wall was low and not a lot will happen to those kids other than the world will find out that they are young trash and we will all wish they were the ones that died.
I'm thinking about $7 mill to the Sousa family from the zoo. The other 2 and their 3rd friend should have to clean up the poop in the tiger exhibit for the rest of their lives.
The zoo will get sued because the wall was low and not a lot will happen to those kids other than the world will find out that they are young trash and we will all wish they were the ones that died.
I'm thinking about $7 mill to the Sousa family from the zoo. The other 2 and their 3rd friend should have to clean up the poop in the tiger exhibit for the rest of their lives.
01-03-2008, 06:19 PM
#99
Forester Specialist
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 3,985
Car Info: '98/'04 Foresters (S & XT)
I think it would be much cheaper for the city to simply put out a contract hit on the entire family. The parents for being stupid enough to breed when they obviously had no idea of how to raise children, and the rest so they can't collect the money.
From the sound of it, there isn't a member of that family who is anything more than a waste of space.
From the sound of it, there isn't a member of that family who is anything more than a waste of space.
01-03-2008, 06:57 PM
#100
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: N38.6775* W120.0805*
Posts: 3,548
Car Info: psm.03.wrx.wgn
Originally Posted by brucelee
Originally Posted by Roo
I think it would be much cheaper for the city to simply put out a contract hit on the entire family. The parents for being stupid enough to breed when they obviously had no idea of how to raise children, and the rest so they can't collect the money.
From the sound of it, there isn't a member of that family who is anything more than a waste of space.
From the sound of it, there isn't a member of that family who is anything more than a waste of space.
01-03-2008, 07:10 PM
#102
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 929
Car Info: 07 350Z
....Wow, I dont know why the F we are all arguing about this, but I meant "part or section" as in specifics in the World. I really don't care where the hell he is from, so you can blame me for "miswording it." Good Night
01-03-2008, 11:03 PM
#103
Old School
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Union City
Posts: 14,983
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
I think it would be much cheaper for the city to simply put out a contract hit on the entire family. The parents for being stupid enough to breed when they obviously had no idea of how to raise children, and the rest so they can't collect the money.
From the sound of it, there isn't a member of that family who is anything more than a waste of space.
From the sound of it, there isn't a member of that family who is anything more than a waste of space.
Now if you can only find a way to proceed with the cleansing... hmmm...
01-03-2008, 11:36 PM
#104
Forester Specialist
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 3,985
Car Info: '98/'04 Foresters (S & XT)
but never again will that be allowed to happen...hopefully.
01-05-2008, 01:28 PM
#105
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 74
Haha, nice. My sentiments exactly. Damn finally giving darwinism a chance to kill off a few stupid people and we go and shoot the tiger. Why couldn't the tiger be tranquilized by the zoo keepers. These asshats deserved it.