autoblog: evo x vs sti
12-06-2007, 11:14 AM
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 649
Car Info: 2005 WRX, tuned by Ed@EQ
someone on the autoblog post had a good point though. it's not fair to judge the times year to year due to air pressure of tires, air temp, weather, etc. a decent point considering the times each year are soo close.
12-06-2007, 03:44 PM
#11
here's my issue with comparos like these: the driver might be the variable.
unlike the STIG, 2 diff drivers drive the 2 diff cars.
i suggest they hire the STIG to do the timed tests...
unlike the STIG, 2 diff drivers drive the 2 diff cars.
i suggest they hire the STIG to do the timed tests...
12-06-2007, 04:03 PM
#12
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in a glass case of emotion.
Posts: 17,962
Car Info: 345/30/19s
a bit of a hollow victory though...
"Neither car is quite as quick as its immediate ancestor though. "
How the hell do you **** that up? Who in the hell would buy a car, either of these, thats slower AND more expensive than the one its replacing?? Its not like these cars got saddled with crippling emissions or crash standards since last year? They have EVERY reason FASTER than their predecessors?!?
wow,
"Neither car is quite as quick as its immediate ancestor though. "
How the hell do you **** that up? Who in the hell would buy a car, either of these, thats slower AND more expensive than the one its replacing?? Its not like these cars got saddled with crippling emissions or crash standards since last year? They have EVERY reason FASTER than their predecessors?!?
wow,
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sjice
Videos
22
04-27-2005 05:39 PM