Anyone listen to Live 105 this morning? (Bad mouthing Subys)
07-17-2008, 11:48 PM
#48
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hangin in Placerville youtube.com/rallydude1515
Posts: 11,892
Car Info: 1999 RS Coupé- 1995 Mazda Miata -KTM 300
I do like how they say the worst fans they have are in SF, and their best fans are in teh south bay representttttttttt
07-18-2008, 09:40 AM
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 625
Car Info: 1996 Impreza Brighton bone stock sadly
If you think that Woody is a dick for saying that a girl who didn't finish all of her classes shouldn't be allowed to walk, then it makes sense that you think the show sucks. None of the hosts on the show are liberal (which I love). With the exception of Greg (who is conservative), the rest are moderate. Their views often go against those that are typical of the "bay area." But, in all honesty, it doesn't make any sense to say that getting cancer is somehow a replacement for the required courses to graduate HS. If thinking that way makes one a dick, then so be it I guess.
07-18-2008, 09:55 AM
#54
None of the hosts on the show are liberal (which I love). With the exception of Greg (who is conservative), the rest are moderate.
________
Gay ****
Last edited by kyoung05; 03-30-2011 at 07:46 AM.
07-18-2008, 09:57 AM
#55
What? Read what I said again.
There are these grammatical tools called "periods," and what they do is separate one sentence from the next. Sentence 1 says "[n]one of the hosts on the show is liberal." Sentence 2 says that "with the exception of Greg (who is conservative), the rest are moderate." The two sentences are not contradictory, and they certainly are not meant to be muddled together into one sentence. The way you read it was that "[n]one of the hosts on the show are liberal, with the exception of Greg who is conservative," in which case you would have been right. However, that is not what I wrote.
There are these grammatical tools called "periods," and what they do is separate one sentence from the next. Sentence 1 says "[n]one of the hosts on the show is liberal." Sentence 2 says that "with the exception of Greg (who is conservative), the rest are moderate." The two sentences are not contradictory, and they certainly are not meant to be muddled together into one sentence. The way you read it was that "[n]one of the hosts on the show are liberal, with the exception of Greg who is conservative," in which case you would have been right. However, that is not what I wrote.
07-18-2008, 10:03 AM
#57
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 625
Car Info: 1996 Impreza Brighton bone stock sadly
What? Read what I said again.
There are these grammatical tools called "periods," and what they do is separate one sentence from the next. Sentence 1 says "[n]one of the hosts on the show is liberal." Sentence 2 says that "with the exception of Greg (who is conservative), the rest are moderate." The two sentences are not contradictory, and they certainly are not meant to be muddled together into one sentence. The way you read it was that "[n]one of the hosts on the show are liberal, with the exception of Greg who is conservative," in which case you would have been right. However, that is not what I wrote.
There are these grammatical tools called "periods," and what they do is separate one sentence from the next. Sentence 1 says "[n]one of the hosts on the show is liberal." Sentence 2 says that "with the exception of Greg (who is conservative), the rest are moderate." The two sentences are not contradictory, and they certainly are not meant to be muddled together into one sentence. The way you read it was that "[n]one of the hosts on the show are liberal, with the exception of Greg who is conservative," in which case you would have been right. However, that is not what I wrote.
