Aftermarket Auto Moon Roof for '05 STi??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2007, 11:58 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
hkwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 109
Aftermarket Auto Moon Roof for '05 STi??

Hello,

anyone done that? Any good shop to suggest in the Bay Area?

Would that weaken the structure?

Thanks in advance.
hkwan is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 12:52 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
sti4j0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: [№®*©ªL] .....(Santa Rosa)
Posts: 790
Car Info: '05 sti
personally i'd say f trying to get a moon roof. instead, invest your money into a bigger turbo / fuel system setup .. and fly to teh mewn... and if ur thinkin about keepin ur car cooler.. 2-80 air conditioning is the best... (2 windows down goin 80) which ur car could get up to in > 5 seconds from a dead stop ;P
my twocense
sti4j0n is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 12:55 AM
  #3  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
resident smurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 1,952
Car Info: a prius, a miata, & 2 m3's
Sorta goes against the purpose of the car (adds weight in the worst possible location on the body). You probably won't notice it if you don't push your car that hard, though. I would never do it on my STi, but it's your car!
resident smurf is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 03:14 AM
  #4  
VIP Member
iTrader: (22)
 
medicSTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vacaville
Posts: 9,542
Car Info: 2017 CWP WRX & 2007 SWP WRX
^ that is exactly what i was thinking... in one of the BMI videos they have a segment showing the difference between the evo 9 and 8's i believe, the difference being a 4-6lb lighter roof. i would never do it based on handling, but if you are more into the looks than track days, go for it
medicSTi is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 08:49 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
hkwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 109
Got it guys; I am not going to do it anymore, actually not way too much interest for doing it. Was just seeking some opinion, that's all. Thank you for the feedbacks. Help me out on making decision.
hkwan is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 03:09 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Bell R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Posts: 265
I know you've already decided not to do it, but the reasons I wouldn't do it aren't because of weight. I'd be surprised if there's a weight difference at all, unless you want to get one that's powered. Putting a carbon fiber driveshaft in (-10lbs) or so would give the same effect (shifting the CG upward half a mm or so), and lots of the STI community has done that with not a second thought.

I wouldn't do it simply because I'd never trust anyone to hack a huge hole in my roof. It's going to cost an arm and a leg to do, and unless it's perfect, I'm going to hate it.
Bell R is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 03:19 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
hkwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 109
That's also part of my consideration as well. I'd hate to bring the car back to the monkeys if it is not working in any way.

The cost, seems like, it's below $1k. Runs about 900 otd...
hkwan is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 05:08 PM
  #8  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
resident smurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 1,952
Car Info: a prius, a miata, & 2 m3's
Originally Posted by Bell R
I know you've already decided not to do it, but the reasons I wouldn't do it aren't because of weight. I'd be surprised if there's a weight difference at all, unless you want to get one that's powered. Putting a carbon fiber driveshaft in (-10lbs) or so would give the same effect (shifting the CG upward half a mm or so), and lots of the STI community has done that with not a second thought.

I wouldn't do it simply because I'd never trust anyone to hack a huge hole in my roof. It's going to cost an arm and a leg to do, and unless it's perfect, I'm going to hate it.
Yeah, but the CF D/Shaft is not increasing weight anywhere whereas the moonroof would add about 40lbs in the worst possible spot. One is an improvement and one is not.

I do agree about the fit and finish worries though. Aftermarket moonroofs are shady.

Originally Posted by 4URABUS
Why does everyone act like adding a few pounds of weight to the roof is the end of the world? Unless he's got a racing championship title on the line, WGAF?

If anything, I would be much more concerned about fit-and-finish, wind noise, water leaks, and where to get warranty repairs.
It's not the end of the world by any means, but by the same train of thought why drive a fast car on the street anyway? The speed limit is 65? IMHO, the less compromises the better, and the moonroof is a pretty large compromise. It's one of the most significant reasons purists decided against buying the U.S.-spec 997 GT3- Porsche spec'd a mandatory moonroof on the U.S. GT3 (even though they allow the option to delete it on the 997 GT3 RS which costs $20k more).

Judging by the way 40lbs of ballast affects my race car (about .3 of a second), a moonroof is probably worth close to that on a road course like Thunderhill or Infineon. However, my ballast is mounted in the lowest point possible (passenger side footwell). In the case when its mounted in the roof, the transitional response is severely compromised- think of it as holding a weight straight up in the air with your arm and trying to run around and change direction. It becomes more difficult... read: more body roll. Given that the STi is a purist/enthusiast road car, I'd say the moonroof is somewhat "out of character" even if the effects aren't going to be noticed by many (most) individuals who drive them.

Last edited by resident smurf; 06-21-2007 at 05:16 PM.
resident smurf is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 08:04 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
cyber_x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 55
Dammit now I want a moonroof.
cyber_x is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 08:18 PM
  #10  
VIP Member
iTrader: (22)
 
medicSTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vacaville
Posts: 9,542
Car Info: 2017 CWP WRX & 2007 SWP WRX
Originally Posted by resident smurf
...
Judging by the way 40lbs of ballast affects my race car (about .3 of a second), a moonroof is probably worth close to that on a road course like Thunderhill or Infineon. However, my ballast is mounted in the lowest point possible (passenger side footwell). In the case when its mounted in the roof, the transitional response is severely compromised- think of it as holding a weight straight up in the air with your arm and trying to run around and change direction. It becomes more difficult... read: more body roll. Given that the STi is a purist/enthusiast road car, I'd say the moonroof is somewhat "out of character" even if the effects aren't going to be noticed by many (most) individuals who drive them.
Well put
medicSTi is offline  
Old 06-21-2007, 10:05 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Bell R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Posts: 265
Originally Posted by resident smurf
Yeah, but the CF D/Shaft is not increasing weight anywhere whereas the moonroof would add about 40lbs in the worst possible spot. One is an improvement and one is not.
40lbs? I'd be surprised if it was 10, just a pane of glass and some gasket and sealant where there used to be metal. Unless you want it powered/sliding, then 40. I was just thinking of the kind that pops open.

Ideally, if you wanted to take weight away, you'd do so right at the center of gravity, so the CF driveshaft, while lighter, will cause the balance of the car to change. Will anything short of a professional driver notice? No. But I bet the differences are comparable between that and the (non-powered) moonroof.

I'd love to be able to let some light in through the roof. I open the moonroof in my civic all the time. It's probably my favorite feature on that car (that and the 35mpg )
Bell R is offline  
Old 06-26-2007, 09:06 AM
  #12  
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
STiYLIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Slumboldt
Posts: 3,160
Car Info: I is not STiYLIN n e moar
people have done it, but they cut the support beam out, and their roof flops around.
STiYLIN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tommysyko
Interior, Exterior & Lighting
1
08-03-2009 09:58 AM
dfinn
Suby Shopping & Maintenance/Warranty
6
04-07-2005 05:18 PM
anerd
Interior, Exterior & Lighting
6
09-04-2004 06:39 PM
HughJayness
Subaru General
0
01-27-2003 05:25 PM



Quick Reply: Aftermarket Auto Moon Roof for '05 STi??



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:25 PM.