2014 Wrx engine failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2014 | 10:06 PM
  #61  
brucelee's Avatar
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 19,930
From: www.gunatics.com
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
I'm also jumping off the Subaru ship.

My 2007 STi motor blew at 40k, turbo went out at 80k. Car has been bone stock for 40k miles now. I do regular maintenance and use the best possible oils, etc.
Old 03-13-2014 | 10:59 PM
  #62  
91vtec's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,357
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2011 Sti SWP
Just curious for those whos engines blew

What symptoms were seen and how did you confirm bad engine
Old 03-13-2014 | 11:18 PM
  #63  
Overbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
So Subaru not addressing known engine component faults are ok? I should have done some research on how weak the internals are on these "Performance" cars. A direct competitor uses Forged internals not cast and I realize why they are more expensive.
You should have left it alone and kept it stock. Subaru does not sell cars with the intent of being modded, that is a 3rd party function.

You mod, its on you, all of us that mod are in the same boat. If my brand new 08+ oem block goes bad, its going to be on me because I have modded and tuned. I have done things with it, the engineers, you know the guys who DESIGNED the motor, never intended.

So, if you wanted to mod the motor, you should have done the research yes, known what you were getting into, what the outcome could be, and that you were doing something the car was never built to do. You want to point fingers at SOA, at others, when you should be pointing it at yourself.
Old 03-14-2014 | 06:20 AM
  #64  
Brfatal's Avatar
Technical Know-It-All
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,123
From: Sterling, VA
Car Info: '02 WRX + '15 WRX
Originally Posted by 91vtec
Just curious for those whos engines blew

What symptoms were seen and how did you confirm bad engine
Which one?
Old 03-14-2014 | 08:20 AM
  #65  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by Overbear
You should have left it alone and kept it stock. Subaru does not sell cars with the intent of being modded, that is a 3rd party function.

You mod, its on you, all of us that mod are in the same boat. If my brand new 08+ oem block goes bad, its going to be on me because I have modded and tuned. I have done things with it, the engineers, you know the guys who DESIGNED the motor, never intended.

So, if you wanted to mod the motor, you should have done the research yes, known what you were getting into, what the outcome could be, and that you were doing something the car was never built to do. You want to point fingers at SOA, at others, when you should be pointing it at yourself.
Forget modding. Go take a bone stock STI on a track a handful of times and see how long it survives. Modding has very little to do with the failures. It's generally aggressive driving that takes them out. The problem is the Subaru is selling people performance cars and expects them to be driven like Camry's.

-- Ed
Old 03-14-2014 | 08:46 AM
  #66  
Deniz1980's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 604
From: Solano County
Car Info: WRB 2012 WRX Sedan
SOA bag the Harmon Kardon or whatever upgraded sound system you have, the moon roof, and that funky batman wing..... And give us a performance built motor or we are all getting GTR's
Old 03-14-2014 | 08:48 AM
  #67  
damianwrb07's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 649
From: turlock ca
Car Info: '14 Wrx Hatchback
Originally Posted by Overbear
You should have left it alone and kept it stock. Subaru does not sell cars with the intent of being modded, that is a 3rd party function.

You mod, its on you, all of us that mod are in the same boat. If my brand new 08+ oem block goes bad, its going to be on me because I have modded and tuned. I have done things with it, the engineers, you know the guys who DESIGNED the motor, never intended.

So, if you wanted to mod the motor, you should have done the research yes, known what you were getting into, what the outcome could be, and that you were doing something the car was never built to do. You want to point fingers at SOA, at others, when you should be pointing it at yourself.
Your completely missing the point. The wrx/Sti is marketed as a "performance car" and the internal engine parts are cheap and fail on even on stock motors, these cars were supposedly designed to be driven hard (not every time you get in them)but we didn't buy a Kia for a reason

Last edited by damianwrb07; 03-14-2014 at 08:51 AM.
Old 03-14-2014 | 08:51 AM
  #68  
CBSubie's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 353
From: California
Car Info: 2005 STi
I'm on my last Subaru. My first STi went out due to a bad oil pick up tube (have you guys ever seen the factory welds on a new oem oil p/u tube?). My second motor went out last year.. Im really considering an Accord haha..
Old 03-14-2014 | 08:51 AM
  #69  
Overbear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,856
From: San Leandro, CA
Car Info: Forester XTi
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
Forget modding. Go take a bone stock STI on a track a handful of times and see how long it survives. Modding has very little to do with the failures. It's generally aggressive driving that takes them out. The problem is the Subaru is selling people performance cars and expects them to be driven like Camry's.

-- Ed
They don't market the WRX or the STI as a "track car" its a "sports car".


My point is here people is simple... caveat emptor
Old 03-14-2014 | 09:21 AM
  #70  
Scoobywax's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,228
From: Santa Cruz, California
Car Info: 2006 obp wrx limited sedan
Originally Posted by Deniz1980
SOA bag the Harmon Kardon or whatever upgraded sound system you have, the moon roof, and that funky batman wing..... And give us a performance built motor or we are all getting GTR's
I upgraded my own sound system, love the moon roof and ditched my bat wing for a limited fin.

Yall should have bought old subies or a new evo.

The 2014 Evolution MR is my next sports car.
Old 03-14-2014 | 09:30 AM
  #71  
Shayhan27's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,127
From: Livermore
Car Info: LUMPY CGM 05 WRX
If only I knew back in 2008 when I bought my WRX now, I would have bought and EVO 8 MR.

Cams, injectors, fuel pump, turbo = less money and more powa.......
Old 03-14-2014 | 10:00 AM
  #72  
Roo's Avatar
Roo
Forester Specialist
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,985
From: Sonoma County
Car Info: '98/'04 Foresters (S & XT)
Originally Posted by damianwrb07
Your completely missing the point. The wrx/Sti is marketed as a "performance car" and the internal engine parts are cheap and fail on even on stock motors, these cars were supposedly designed to be driven hard (not every time you get in them)but we didn't buy a Kia for a reason
Perhaps you should ask Subaru to produce a new STi that has 700+ WHP, run on regular gas, get at least 50MPG, not require maintenance, and stick with the same price tag.

Fast, Cheap, Reliable - choose two.
Old 03-14-2014 | 10:00 AM
  #73  
UKn00b's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 325
From: Hayward
Car Info: 1996 Impreza L
Oddly enough Subaru would like to do away with all forced induction models as soon as they can especially SOA, the reason given is they account for less than -10% of SOA gross sales yet yield over 78% of all warranty claims
Old 03-14-2014 | 10:05 AM
  #74  
UKn00b's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 325
From: Hayward
Car Info: 1996 Impreza L
It's also plausible that Subaru knows the weakness in their current EJ257 engines given that since it's release in MY04 the stated crank output has increased roughly 2% (300 to 305) I'm fairly certain just about every other manufacturer that has a car still in it's line up even NA models boasts far more increase on their engines over a 10 year span!
Old 03-14-2014 | 10:35 AM
  #75  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Originally Posted by Overbear
They don't market the WRX or the STI as a "track car" its a "sports car".


My point is here people is simple... caveat emptor
That's a good point. The WRX/STI isn't a race car. Things break faster at the track.

Originally Posted by Shayhan27
If only I knew back in 2008 when I bought my WRX now, I would have bought and EVO 8 MR.

Cams, injectors, fuel pump, turbo = less money and more powa.......
You don't want the MR. The 5 speed is more reliable and can handle more abuse compared to the 6 speed in the Evo 8/9 MR.

Originally Posted by Roo
Perhaps you should ask Subaru to produce a new STi that has 700+ WHP, run on regular gas, get at least 50MPG, not require maintenance, and stick with the same price tag.

Fast, Cheap, Reliable - choose two.
Very true



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 PM.