200 Hp @ 2000 Rpm
#7
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,648
From: SBAIC-South BayArea Impreza Club-Campbell, CA-Thur
Car Info: 2003 PSM STi
Originally Posted by Racenut
200 HP @ 2000 RPM
650 ft-lb torque @ 1200 RPM
265 lb dry weight
Wow!
650 ft-lb torque @ 1200 RPM
265 lb dry weight
Wow!
damn, you beat me to it! LOL that is amazing! the next generation of combustion engines....thats some star trek ish!
#8
Originally Posted by verc
wtf how does this thing work... lol
#12
Originally Posted by ipozestu
It's pretty simple actually. Think of your standard engine, piston attached to a crank shaft by rods. Each is off set of center on the crank shaft. When a cylinder fires this axial movement causes radial movement one the crank. Got it? Ok. In this case the pistons run parallel to the output shaft. Each set of pistons 6 in total are attached. At the center of each piston set there is a roller bearing on the end each piston. In the center is the cam. Don't think of it as a traditional cam. See how it has a wavy look. As the piston fires it forces axial force on the center cam this is also the exhaust stroke for the opposite attached cylinder. As the force is applied to the top of the center cam radial force is transmitted to the output shaft. Does that make sense?
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,504
From: Leg Humper
Car Info: '03 WRX wagon, faster than walkin'
Actually, I have been looking at the sketch - I think there are several places for failure, or at least weakness....have they actually built one of these or is it just a concept?
I suspect it is just a concept because there are only sketches and no pics and the numbers are way to round - 200 and 650 to be actual measurements.
It is a good idea, a really good idea, but I don't think it has been built yet.
I suspect it is just a concept because there are only sketches and no pics and the numbers are way to round - 200 and 650 to be actual measurements.
It is a good idea, a really good idea, but I don't think it has been built yet.
#15
Hmm... sounds like it would be a real pain to change the spark plugs on the output side.
Can someone explain this to me:
I don't get it ...? If there are bearings on the conrods that "ride" on the sinusoidal cam, then there IS side loading on the pistons because the force will be normal to the contact point on the cam. Am I missing something?
Can someone explain this to me:
The main drive shaft lies in parallel orientation to the piston movement, thus eliminating the need for a crankshaft.* This allows the pistons to travel in true linear motion with no side-loading, thereby eliminating the need for piston rings.*
Last edited by Necromancer; 08-06-2005 at 01:29 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flame30689
Subaru General
6
09-22-2008 11:16 AM
2point5AWD
Car Lounge
21
07-01-2006 08:19 PM
oakfloor
Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas)
5
04-08-2003 11:00 PM